Skip to main content
Log in

Finite area smoothing with generalized distance splines

  • Published:
Environmental and Ecological Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most conventional spatial smoothers smooth with respect to the Euclidean distance between observations, even though this distance may not be a meaningful measure of spatial proximity, especially when boundary features are present. When domains have complicated boundaries leakage (the inappropriate linking of parts of the domain which are separated by physical barriers) can occur. To overcome this problem, we develop a method of smoothing with respect to generalized distances, such as within domain distances. We obtain the generalized distances between our points and then use multidimensional scaling to find a configuration of our observations in a Euclidean space of 2 or more dimensions, such that the Euclidian distances between points in that space closely approximate the generalized distances between the points. Smoothing is performed over this new point configuration, using a conventional smoother. To mitigate the problems associated with smoothing in high dimensions we use a generalization of thin plate spline smoothers proposed by Duchon (Constructive theory of functions of several variables, pp 85–100, 1977). This general method for smoothing with respect to generalized distances improves on the performance of previous within-domain distance spatial smoothers, and often provides a more natural model than the soap film approach of Wood et al. (J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol 70(5):931–955, 2008). The smoothers are of the linear basis with quadratic penalty type easily incorporated into a range of statistical models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Augustin N, Musio M, von Wilpert K, Kublin E, Wood SN, Schumacher M (2009) Modeling spatiotemporal forest health monitoring data. J Am Stat Assoc 104(487):899–911

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein M, De Silva V, Langford J, Tenenbaum J (2000) Graph approximations to geodesics on embedded manifolds. Technical report, Department of Psychology, Stanford University. ftp://ftp-sop.inria.fr/prisme/boissonnat/ImageManifolds/isomap.pdf

  • Chatfield C, Collins AJ (1980) Introduction to multivariate analysis. Science paperbacks, Chapman and Hall

  • Curriero F (2005) On the use of non-euclidean isotropy in geostatistics. Technical report 94, Johns Hopkins University, Department of Biostatistics. http://www.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1094&context=jhubiostat

  • Driscoll TA, Trefethen L (2002) Schwartz-Christoffel transform. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Duchon J (1977) Splines minimizing rotation-invariant semi-norms in Sobolev spaces. Constructive theory of functions of several variables, pp 85–100

  • Floyd RW (1962) Algorithm 97: shortest path. Commun. ACM 5(6):345–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gower J (1968) Adding a point to vector diagrams in multivariate analysis. Biometrika 55(3):582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastie TJ, Tibshirani RJ (1990) Generalized additive models. Monographs on statistics and applied probability. Taylor & Francis, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Higham NJ (1987) Computing real square roots of a real matrix. Linear Algebra Appl 88–89:405–430. doi:10.1016/0024-3795(87)90118-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen OP, Christman MC, Miller TJ (2006) Landscape-based geostatistics: a case study of the distribution of blue crab in Chesapeake Bay. Environmetrics 17(6):605–621. doi:10.1002/env.767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Løland A, Høst G (2003) Spatial covariance modelling in a complex coastal domain by multidimensional scaling. Environmetrics 14(3):307–321. doi:10.1002/env.588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller DL (2012) On smooth models for complex domains and distances. PhD thesis, University of Bath

  • Miller DL, Burt ML, Rexstad EA (2013) Spatial models for distance sampling data: recent developments and future directions. Methods in Ecology and Evolution

  • Oh MS, Raftery AE (2001) Bayesian multidimensional scaling and. J Am Stat Assoc 96(455):1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay T (2002) Spline smoothing over difficult regions. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol 64(2):307–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rue H, Held L (2005) Gaussian Markov random fields: theory and applications. Monographs on statistics and applied probability. Taylor & Francis, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ruppert D, Wand M, Carroll RJ (2003) Semiparametric regression. Cambridge series on statistical and probabilistic mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson PD, Guttorp P (1992) Nonparametric estimation of nonstationary spatial covariance structure. J Am Stat Assoc 87(417):108–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott-Hayward LAS, MacKenzie ML, Donovan CR, Walker CG, Ashe E (2013) Complex region spatial smoother (CReSS). J Comput Graph. Stat. doi: 10.1080/10618600.2012.762920

  • Vretblad A (2003) Fourier analysis and its applications. Graduate texts in mathematics. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Ranalli M (2007) Low-rank smoothing splines on complicated domains. Biometrics 63(1):209–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams R, Hedley SL, Branch TA, Bravington MV, Zerbini AN, Findlay KP (2011) Chilean blue whales as a case study to illustrate methods to estimate abundance and evaluate conservation status of rare species. Conserv Biol 25(3):526–535. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01656.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood SN (2003) Thin plate regression splines. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol 65(1):95–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood SN (2006) Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. Chapman & Hall/CRC, London

  • Wood SN (2011) Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol 73(1):3–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood SN, Bravington MV, Hedley SL (2008) Soap film smoothing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol 70(5):931–955

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are especially grateful to Jean Duchon for generous help in understanding Duchon (1977). David wishes to thank EPSRC for financial support during his PhD at the University of Bath.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David L. Miller.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Ashis SenGupta.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (pdf 140 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miller, D.L., Wood, S.N. Finite area smoothing with generalized distance splines. Environ Ecol Stat 21, 715–731 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-014-0277-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-014-0277-4

Keywords

Navigation