Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ranked set sampling: its essence and some new applications

  • Published:
Environmental and Ecological Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ranked set sampling is a simple idea of great use. It was proposed half a century ago. The last 15 years or so have witnessed considerable development in the research and applications of ranked set sampling. In this paper, we give an overview on ranked set sampling. We review several variants of ranked set sampling developed since the original idea was proposed. We discuss the essence and the theoretical foundation of ranked set sampling. We present some novel applications of ranked set sampling in areas such as clinical trials, genetic quantitative trait loci mappings and others. By doing so, we wish to provide the reader with a philosophical view on ranked set sampling and shed some lights on a broader range of its applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Saleh MF and Zheng G (2002). Estimation of bivariate characteristics using ranked set sampling. Aust N Z J Stat 44: 221–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai ZD and Chen Z (2003). On the theory of ranked set sampling and its ramifications. J Stat Plan Infer 109: 81–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z (1999). Density estimation using ranked-set sampling data. Environ Ecol Stat 6: 135–146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z (2000a). The efficiency of ranked-set sampling relative to simple random sampling under Multi-parameter Families. Stat Sin 10: 247–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z (2000b). On ranked-set sample quantiles and their applications. J Stat Plan Infer 83: 125–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z (2001). The optimal ranked-set sampling scheme for inference on population quantiles. Stat Sin 11: 23–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z (2002). Adaptive ranked set sampling with multiple concomitant variables: an effective way to observational economy. Bernoulli 8: 313–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z and Bai ZD (2000). The optimal ranked-set sampling scheme for parametric families. Sankhya Ser A 62: 178–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z and Shen L (2003). Two-layer ranked set sampling with concomitant variables. J Stat Plan Infer 115: 45–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z and Wang Y (2004). Efficient regression analysis with ranked set sampling. Biometrics 60: 997–1004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Bai ZD and Sinha BK (2004). Ranked set sampling: theory and applications. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Liu J, Shen L, Wang Y (2006) General ranked set sampling for efficient treatment comparisons. Stat Sin (accepted, to appear)

  • Chen Z, Zheng G, Ghosh K and Li Z (2005). Linkage disequilibrium mapping of quantitative trait loci by selective genotyping. Am J Hum Genet 77: 661–669

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer SM, Squires KE, Hughes MD, Grimes JM, Demeter LM, Currier JS, Feinberg JE, Deyton LR, Chodakewitz JA, Fischl MA, Eron JJ and Balfour HH (1997). A controlled trial of two nucleoside analogues plus indinavir in persons with human immunodeficiency virus infection and CD4 cell counts of 200 per cubic millimeter or less. N Engl J Med 337: 725–733

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnaiah PR, Sen PK (1984) Tables for order statistics. In: Krishnaiah PR, Sen PK (eds), Handbook of statistics, vol 4. Elsevier Science Publishers, pp 892–897

  • MacEachern SN, Ozturk O, Stark G and Wolfe DA (2002). A new ranked set sample estimator of variance. J R Stat Soc Ser B 64: 177–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marschner IC, Betensky RA, DeGruttola V, Hammer SM and Kuritzkes DR (1999). Clinical trials using HIV-1 RNA-based primary endpoints: statistical analysis and potential biases. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 20: 220–227

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre GA (1952). A method of unbiased selective sampling, using ranked sets. Aust J Agric Res 3: 385–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahhas RW, Wolfe DA and Chen H (2002). Ranked set sampling: cost and optimal set size. Biometrics 58: 964–971

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk O (2002). Ranked set sample rank regression estimator. J Am Stat Assoc 97: 1180–1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk O and MacEachern SN (2004). Order restricted randomized designs for control versus treatment comparison. Ann Inst Stat Math 56: 701–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk O and Wolfe DA (2000a). Optimal allocation procedure in ranked set sampling for unimodal and multi-modal distributions. Environ Ecol Stat 7: 343–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk O and Wolfe DA (2000b). An improved ranked set two-sample Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test. Can J Statist 28: 123–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk O and Wolfe DA (2000c). Optimal allocation procedures in ranked set two-sample median test. J Nonparamet Stat 13: 57–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk O and Wolfe DA (2001). A new ranked set sampling protocol for the signed rank test. J Stat Plan Infer 96: 351–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patil GP, Sinha AK, Taillie C (1994) Ranked set sampling. In: Patil GP, Rao CR (eds) Handbook of statistics, vol. 12: environmental statistics, North-Holland, pp 167–200

  • Patil GP, Sinha AK and Taillie C (1999). Ranked set sampling: a bibliography. Environ Ecol Stat 6: 91–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Presnell B and Bohn LL (1999). U-statistics and imperfect ranking in ranked set sampling. J Nonparamet Stat 10: 111–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samawi HM and Muttlak HA (1996). Estimation of ratio using rank set sampling. Biomet J 38: 753–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinsheimer JS, Blangero J and Lange K (2000). Gamete competition models. Am J Hum Genet 66: 1168–1172

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slatkin M (1999). Disequilibrium mapping of a quantitative-trait locus in an expanding population. Am J Hum Genet 64: 1765–1773

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spielman RS, McGinnis RE and Ewens WJ (1993). Transmission test for linkage disequilibrium: the insulin gene region and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). Am J Hum Genet 52: 506–516

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes SL (1977). Ranked set sampling with concomitant variables. Commun Stat Theory Methods A 6(12): 1207–1211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes SL and Sager TW (1988). Characterization of a ranked set sample with application to estimating distribution functions. J Am Stat Assoc 83: 374–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Chen Z and Liu J (2004). General ranked set sampling with cost considerations. Biometrics 60: 556–561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Xu XP, Rogus JJ and Terwedom HA (1999). An extreme-sib-pair genome scan for genes regulating blood pressure. Am J Hum Genet 64: 1694–1701

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X and Chen Z (2002). On the ranked-set sampling M-estimates for symmetric location families. Ann Inst Stat Math 54: 626–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng G, Ghosh K, Chen Z and Li Z (2006). Extreme rank selection for linkage analysis of quantitative traits using selected sib pairs. Ann Hum Genet 70: 857–866

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zehua Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, Z. Ranked set sampling: its essence and some new applications. Environ Ecol Stat 14, 355–363 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-007-0025-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-007-0025-0

Keywords

Navigation