Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic factor process convolution models for multivariate space–time data with application to air quality assessment

  • Published:
Environmental and Ecological Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We propose a Bayesian dynamic factor process convolution model for multivariate spatial temporal processes and illustrate the utility of this approach in modeling large air quality monitoring data. Key advantages of this modeling framework are a descriptive parametrization of the cross-covariance structure of the space-time processes and dimension reduction features that allow full Bayesian inference procedures to remain computationally tractable for large data sets. These features result from modeling space-time data as realizations of linear combinations of underlying space-time fields. The underlying latent components are constructed by convolving temporally-evolving processes defined on a grid covering the spatial domain and include both trend and cyclical components. We argue that mixtures of such components can realistically describe a variety of space-time environmental processes and are especially applicable to air pollution processes that have complex space–time dependencies. In addition to the computational benefits that arise from the dimension reduction features of the model, the process convolution structure permits misaligned and missing data without the need for imputation when fitting the model. This advantage is especially useful when constructing models for data collected at monitoring stations that have misaligned sampling schedules and that are frequently out of service for long stretches of time. We illustrate the modeling approach using a multivariate pollution dataset taken from the EPA’s CASTNet database.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguilar O (1998) Latent structure in Bayesian multivariate time series models. Ph.D. thesis, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708

  • Aguilar O and West M (2000). Bayesian dynamic factor models and variance matrix discounting for portfolio allocation. J Bus Econ Stat 18: 338–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry R and Ver Hoef J (1996). Blackbox kriging: spatial prediction without specifying variogram models. J Agri Biol Environ Stat 1: 297–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calder CA, Holloman C, Higdon, D (2002) Exploring space-time structure in ozone concentration using a dynamic process convolution model. In: Case studies in bayesian statistics, 6. Vol Springer-Verlag pp 165–176

  • Carter C and Kohn R (1994). On Gibbs sampling for state space models. Biometrika 81(3): 541–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen W and Amemiya Y (2001). Generalized shift-factor analysis method for multivariate geo-referenced data. Math Geol 33(7): 801–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen W and Amemiya Y (2002). Latent variable analysis of multivariate spatial data. J Am Stat Assoc 97(457): 302–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cressie N, Wikle C (2002) Encyclopedia of environmetrics, chap. Space-time Kalman Filtering. Wiley & Sons

  • Frühwirth-Schnatter S (1994). Data augmentation and dynamic linear models. J Time Ser Anal 15: 183–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand A, Schmidt A, Banerjee S and Sirmans C (2004). Nonstionary multivariate process modeling through spatially varying coregionalization. Test 13(2): 263–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand A and Smith A (1990). Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities. J the Am Stat Assoc 85(410): 398–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higdon D (1998). A process-convolution approach to modeling temperatures in the North Atlantic Ocean. J Enviro Ecolo Stat 5: 173–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higdon D (2002) Space and space-time modeling using process convolutions. In: Anderson C, Barnett V, Chatwin PC, El-Shaarawi AH (eds), Quantitative methods for current environmental issues. Springer Verlag, pp 37–56

  • Higdon D, Swall J, Kern J (1998) Non-stationary spatial modeling. In: (eds) Bernardo, JM, Berger, JO, Dawid, AP, Smith, AFM. Bayesian Statistics 6, Oxford University Press pp 761–768

  • Huerta G, Sanśo B and Stroud J (2004). A spatiotemporal model for Mexico City ozone levels. J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat 53: 231–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalman R (1960). A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. J Basic Eng (ASME) 82: 35–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern J (2000) Bayesian process-convolution approaches to specifying spatial dependence structure. Ph.D. thesis, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708

  • Lavery T, Rogers C, Howell H, Burnett M, Wanta C (2002) Clean air status and trends network (CASTNet): 2000 Annual Report. Tech. rep., United States Environmental Protection Agency. Prepared by: Harding ESE

  • Lee H, Higdon D, Calder C and Holloman C (2005). Efficient models for correlated data via convolutions of intrinsic processes. Stat Model 5(1): 53–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopes H and West M (2004). Bayesian model assessment in factor analysis. Stat Sinica 14: 41–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein M (1999). Interpolation of spatial data: some theory for kriging. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiébaux HJ and Pedder MA (1987). Spatial objective analysis with applications in atmospheric science. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ver Hoef J and Barry R (1998). Constructing and fitting models for cokriging and multivariable spatial prediction. J Stat Plan Inference 69: 275–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ver Hoef J, Cressie N and Barry R (2004). Flexible spatial models for kriging and cokriging using moving averages and the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT). J Comput Graph Stat 13: 265–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel H (1998). Multivariate geostatistics. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • West M (1995). Bayesian inference in cyclical component dynamic linear models. J Am Stat Assoc 90: 1301–1312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West M and Harrison J (1997). Bayesian forecasting and dynamic models. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikle C, Berliner L and Cressie N (1998). Hierarchical Bayesian space-time models. Environ Ecol Stat 5: 117–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wikle C, Milliff R, Nychka D and Berliner L (2001). Spatio-temporal hierarchical bayesian modeling: tropical ocean surface winds. J Am Stat Assoc 96: 382–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu K, Wikle Ck and Fox NI (2005). A kernel-based spatio-temporal dynamical model for nowcasting radar precipitation. J Am Stat Assoc 100: 1133–1144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine A. Calder.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Calder, C.A. Dynamic factor process convolution models for multivariate space–time data with application to air quality assessment. Environ Ecol Stat 14, 229–247 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-007-0019-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-007-0019-y

Keywords

Navigation