Abstract
This review describes parts of our research program on example-based learning that relates to recent efforts to incorporate interactive elements into learning environments designed to support learning from worked-out examples. Since most learners spontaneously study or process examples in a very passive or superficial manner, this review focuses on how a variety of specific interactive elements in example-based leaning environments are capable of encouraging learners to actively process the examples. The review begins with an overview of the literature on worked examples and the associated self-explanation, which is important given that the quality of self-explanation is a major factor in determining whether learners benefit from studying examples. The review notes that example-based learning environments tend to be effective but often promote passive processing. It then highlights the strengths and limitations of three types interactivity introduced to example-based learning environments. The review concludes with a discussion of the role that these interactive elements play in these learning environments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aleven, V., Stahl, E., Schworm, S., Fischer, F., & Wallace, R. M. (2003). Help Seeking and Help Design in Interactive Learning Environments. Review of Educational Research, 73, 277–320.
Atkinson, R. K., Derry, S. J., Renkl, A., & Wortham, D. W. (2000). Learning from examples: Instructional principles from the worked examples research. Review of Educational Research, 70, 181–214.
Atkinson, R. K., Renkl, A., & Merrill, M. M. (2003). Transitioning from studying examples to solving problems: Effects of self-explanation prompts and fading worked-out steps. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 774–783.
Chi, M. T. H., & Bassok, M. (1989). Learning from examples via self-explanations. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp 251–282). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145–182.
Cooper, G., & Sweller, J. (1987). Effects of schema acquisition and rule automation on mathematical problem-solving transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 347–362.
Hilbert, T. S., Renkl, A., Kessler, S., & Reiss, K. (2007). Learning to prove in geometry: Learning from heuristic examples and how it can be supported. Learning & Instruction (in press).
Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, 38, 23–31.
Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2000). Incorporating learner experience into the design of multimedia instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 126–136.
Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., Tuovinen, J., & Sweller, J. (2001). When problem solving is superior to studying worked examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 579–588.
Kennedy, G. E. (2004). Promoting cognition in multimedia interactivity research. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 15, 43–61.
LeFevre, J., & Dixon, P. (1986). Do written instructions need examples? Cognition & Instruction, 3, 1–30.
Paas, F. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 429–434.
Pirolli, P. L., & Anderson, J. R. (1985). The role of learning from examples in the acquisition of recursive programming skills. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 39, 240–272.
Pirolli, P., & Recker, M. (1994). Learning strategies and transfer in the domain of programming. Cognition & Instruction, 12, 235–275.
Recker, M., & Pirolli, P. (1995), Modeling individual differences in students’ learning strategies. Journal of Learning Sciences, 4, 1–38.
Renkl, A. (1997). Learning from worked-out examples: A study on individual differences. Cognitive Science, 21, 1–29.
Renkl, A. (2002). Learning from worked-out examples: Instructional explanations supplement self-explanations. Learning & Instruction, 12, 149–176.
Renkl, A., Atkinson, R. K., & Große, C. S. (2004). How fading worked solution steps works—a cognitive load perspective. Instructional Science, 32, 59–82.
Renkl, A., Atkinson, R. K., Maier, U. H., & Staley, R. (2002). From example study to problem solving: Smooth transitions help learning. Journal of Experimental Education, 70, 293–315.
Renkl, A., Hilbert, T., Schworm, S., & Reiss, K. (2007). Cognitive skill acquisition from complex examples: a taxonomy of examples and tentative instructional guidelines. In M. Prenzel (Eds.), Studies on the educational quality of schools. Münster, Germany: Waxmann (in press).
Robins, S., & Mayer, R. E. (1993). Schema formation in analogical reasoning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 529–538.
Schworm, S., & Renkl, A. (2006). Computer-supported example-based leaning: When instructional explanations reduce self-explanations. Computers and Education, 46, 426–445.
Schworm, S., & Renkl, A. (2007). Learning argumentation skills through the use of prompts for self-explaining examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 285-296.
Stark, R. (1999). Lernen mit Lösungsbeispielen. Der Einfluß unvollständiger Lösungsschritte auf Beispielelaboration, Motivation und Lernerfolg [Learning by worked-out examples. The impact of incomplete solution steps on example elaboration, motivation, and learning outcomes]. Bern, CH: Huber.
Sweller, J., & Cooper, G. A. (1985). The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition & Instruction, 2, 59–89.
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–296.
Tarmizi, R. A., & Sweller, J. (1988) Guidance during mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 424–436.
Trafton, J. G., & Reiser, B. J. (1993). The contributions of studying examples and solving problems to skill acquisition. In M. Polson (Ed.), Proceedings of the fifteenth annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp 1017–1022). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
VanLehn, K., & Jones, R. M. (1993a). Learning by explaining examples to oneself: A computational model. In S. Chipman & A. Meyrowitz (Eds.), Cognitive models of complex learning (pp 25–82). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
VanLehn, K., & Jones, R. M. (1993b), Integration of analogical search control and explanation-based learning of correctness. In S. Minton (Ed.), Machine learning methods for planning (pp 273–315). Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1990). Strategies for programming instruction in high school: Program completion vs. program generation. Journal of Computing Research, 6, 265–285.
Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & de Crook, M. B. M. (1992). Strategies for computer-based programming instruction: Program completion vs. program generation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 8, 212–234.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Atkinson, R.K., Renkl, A. Interactive Example-Based Learning Environments: Using Interactive Elements to Encourage Effective Processing of Worked Examples. Educ Psychol Rev 19, 375–386 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9055-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9055-2