Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring Self-Regulation: A Focus on Activity

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ainley and Patrick describe an assessment process designed to “identify self- regulation in action.” In the spirit of this goal, the author offers three suggestions for providing a more holistic and contextual view of self-regulation. These suggestions include (a) expanding the definition of self-regulation used in their studies; (b) measuring self-regulation as a dynamic process rather than as a linear one; and (c) including measures of the context, such as task, interpersonal contacts, and community norms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(2), 199–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & Wood, T. (1989). Young children's emotional acts while engaged in mathematical problem solving. In D. B. McLeod & V. M. Adams (Eds.), Affect and mathematical problem solving: A new perspective (pp. 117–148). New York: Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damon, W. (1997). Learning and resistance: When developmental theory meets educational practice. In E. Amsel & K. A. Renninger (Eds.), Change and development: Issues of theory, method, and application (pp. 287–310). Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Järvelä, S. (1995). The cognitive apprenticeship model in a technologically rich learning environment: Interpreting the learning interaction. Learning and Instruction, 5, 237–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (1997). Evaluating development in the process of participation: Theory, methods, and practice building on each other. In E. Amsel & K. A. Renninger (Eds.), Change and development: Issues of theory, method, and application (pp. 265–285). Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C., & Patrick, H. (2004). Motivational influences on student participation in classroom learning activities. Teachers College Record, 106, 1759–1785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Reflections on theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 289–307). Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julianne C. Turner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Turner, J.C. Measuring Self-Regulation: A Focus on Activity. Educ Psychol Rev 18, 293–296 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9022-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9022-3

Keywords

Navigation