Skip to main content
Log in

Environmental flow assessment for improvement of ecological integrity in the Haihe River Basin, China

  • Published:
Ecotoxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Haihe River Basin is a semiarid water resources area of China. River ecosystem was degraded for high population density and intensive water resources development activities. To assist in the improvement of the ecological integrity of this river ecosystem, an environmental flow assessment model was developed that consider both spatial structure and dominant eco-function parameters. River ecosystem was divided into three sub-ecosystems which including river reach, wetland and estuary based on the spatial structure of river ecosystem. River reach was divided into three types which including habitat restoration type (HR), water quality restoration type (WQR) and vegetation restoration substitute water quantity restoration type (VRSWQR) according to their dominant eco-function. The spatio-temporal distribution of environmental flow (EF) for the river ecosystem in the Haihe River Basin was assessed based on the model. The results indicate that the EF for the river reach, wetland, and estuary are 2.267, 1.532, and 0.972 billion m3, respectively. The EF for HR type of river reach, the WQR type of river reach and VRSWQR type of river reach are 1.140, 1.138, and 0.154 billion m3, which are equal to 4.320, 4.312, and 0.584 % of the average annual flow of 26.39 billion m3, respectively. EF for river ecosystem in wet period (June–September), normal period (October–January) and dry period (February–May) are 2.999, 0.951, and 0.821 billion m3, respectively. Annual EF for river ecosystem of the Basin are 4.771 billion m3, which accounts for 18 % of the average annual flows of 26.39 billion m3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acreman M, Dunbar MJ (2004) Defining environmental river flow requirements-a review. Hydrol Earth Syst Sc 5:861–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcazάr J, Palau A (2010) Establishing environmental regimes in a Mediterranean watershed based on a regional classification. J Hydrol 388:41–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcazάr J, Palau A, Vega-Garcìa C (2008) A neural net model for environmental flow estimation at the Ebro River Basin, Spain. J Hydrol 349:44–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthington AH, Bunn SE, Poff NL, Naiman RJ (2006) The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems. Ecol Appl 16:1311–1318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunn SE, Arthington AH (2002) Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environ Manage 30:492–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao H, Hong Y, Li M, Gu JD (2012) Community shift of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria along an anthropogenic pollution gradient from the Pearl River Delta to the South China Sea. Appl Microbiol Biotech 94:247–259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cui BS, Li X, Zhang KJ (2010) Classification of hydrological conditions to assess water allocation schemes for Lake Baiyangdian in North China. J Hydrol 385:247–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleick PH (1998) Water in crisis: paths to sustainable water use. Ecol Appl 3:571–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzάlez A, Gortάzar J, Sanz B, Jalόn G (2008) Dam function rules based on brown trout flow requirements: design of environmental flow regimes in regulated streams. Hydrobiologia 609:253–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo B, Wang LM (2011) Evolution of plain river ecosystem and the corresponding ecological restoration tactics of Haihe River Basin. Haihe Water Resour 6:10–15 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta AD (2008) Implication of environmental flow in river basin management. Phys Chem Earth 33:298–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haihe River Conservancy Commission of the Ministry of Water Resources, 2009.Water Resources Bulletin of Haihe River Basin (in Chinese)

  • Haihe River Conservancy Commission of the Ministry of Water Resources, 2010.Water Resources Bulletin of Haihe River Basin (in Chinese)

  • Hou P, Beeton RJS, Carter RW, Dong XG, Li X (2007) Response to environmental flows in the Lower Tarim River, Xinjiang, China: An ecological interpretation of water-table dynamics. J Environ Manage 83:383–391

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes DA, Hannart P (2003) A desktop model used to provide an initial estimate of the ecological instream flow requirements of rivers in South Africa. J Hydro 270:167–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang J, Yang ZF, Liu JL (2004) Study on ecological water requirement of stream-channel in the plain reach of Hai-River Basin. Geogr Geo-Inform Sci 5:81–83 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin C, Lu ZL, Zhi DG, GuoY (2002) Study on eco-environmental restoration of Haihe River Basin. Water resources and Water Environment Carrying Capacity Symposium, Beijing. China Water Science Information Network (http://www.chinawater.net.cn/cwsnet/szycz/w020522-1.htm) (in Chinese)

  • Liu JL, Yang ZF, Xiao F, Sun T (2005) Conformity calculation models on river ecological basic flows. J Environ Sci 4:436–441 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu JL, Yang ZF, Lin C, Wang Q (2006) Research on the rule of river basin eco-system demand. Chin Water Resour 13:18–21 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu JL, Zeng WH, Zeng Y, Lin C, Yang ZF (2008) The optimal management of the urban river systems in the Haihe River Basin. Science Press, Beijing, China:3–20 (in Chinese)

  • Liu JL, Li YL, Zhang B, Cao JL, Cao ZG, Domagalski J (2009a) Ecological risk of heavy metals in sediments of the Luan River source water. Ecotoxicology 18:748–758

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu JL, Ma MY, Zhang FL, Yang ZF, Domagalski J (2009b) The ecohealth assessment and ecological restoration division of urban water system in Beijing. Ecotoxicology 18:759–767

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu JL, Chen QY, Li YL (2010) Ecological risk assessment of water environment for Luanhe River Basin based on relative risk model. Ecotoxicology 19:1400–1415

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu JL, Chen QY, Li YL, Yang ZF (2011) Fuzzy synthetic model for risk assessment on Haihe River Basin. Ecotoxicology 20:1131–1140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love F, Madamombe E, Marshall B, Kaseke E (2006) Preliminary estimate of environmental flow requirements of the Rusape River, Zimbabwe. Phys Chem Earth 31:864–869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu ZL, Zhang SH, Lin C, Liu DW (2010) Study on ecological protection and restoration mode of plain rivers in the Haihe River Basin. China Water Power Press:67–76 (in Chinese)

  • Ma MY, Liu JL, Wang XM (2011) Biofilms as potential indicators of macrophyte-dominated lake health. Ecotoxicology 20:982–992

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mazvimavi D, Madamombe E, Makurira H (2007) Assessment of environmental flow requirements for river basin planning in Zimbabwe. Phys Chem Earth 32:995–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navratil O, Albert MB, Hérouin E, Gresillon JM (2006) Determinition of bankfull discharge magnitude and frequency: comparison of methods on 16-gravel bed river reaches. Earth Surf Process Landforms 31:1345–1363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petts GE (2009) Instream flow science for sustainable river management. J Am Water Resour As 5:1071–1086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff NL, Zimmerman JKH (2010) Ecological responses to altered flows regimes: a literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flow. Freshw Biol 55:194–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff NL, Allan JD, Bain MB, Karr JR, Prestegaard KL, Richter BD, Sparks RE, Stromberg JC (1997) The natural flow regime: a paradigm for river conservation and restoration. Biosci 47:769–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin DY, Lu CY, Liu JH, Wang H, Zhang GH (2011) Study on dualistic water cycle mode and mechanisms of water resources evolvement of Haihe River Basin. Chin Sci Tech Achieve 23:37–40 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapport DJ, Costanza R, McMichael AJ (1998) Assessing ecosystem health. Trends Ecol Evol 13:397–402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Renöfält BM, Jansson R, Nilsson C (2010) Effects of hydropower generation and opportunities for environmental flow management in Swedish riverine ecosystems. Freshwater Biol 55:49–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter BD, Baumgartner JV, Powell J, Braun DP (1996) A method for assessing hydrological alteration within ecosystems. Conserv Biol 10:1163–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter BD, Warner AT, Meyer JL, Lutz K (2006) A collaborative and adaptive process for developing environmental flow recommendations. River Res Applic 22:297–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen P, Zhou H, Gu JD (2010) Patterns of polychaete communities in relation to environmental perturbations in a subtropical wetland of Hong Kong. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 90:923–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi W, Hou SY, Cui WY, Liu DW, Lin C (2010) Calculation of the ecological water demand of plain rivers in the Haihe River Basin based on river ecological types classification. J Agro-Environ Sci 10:1892–1899 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Song GF, Shen B (2012) Research on river eco-environmental water requirements based on water function regionalization. J Xi’an Univ Tech 1:49–55 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun T, Yang ZF (2005) Study on the approaches for quantifying the environmental flow in estuaries. J Environ Sci 5:573–579 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun T, Yang ZF, Liu JL (2004) Study on the ecological water demands for typical estuaries in Haihe River Basin. Acta Ecol Sin 12:2707–2715 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tharme RE (2003) A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers. River Res Appl 19:397–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tharme RE, King JM (1998) Development of the building block methodology for instream flow assessments and supporting research on the effects of different magnitude flows on river ecosystems. Water Research Commission Report No 576/1/98, Pretoria, South Africa, pp.452

  • The Ministry of Water resourcess of the People’s Republic of China, 2002. Water Resourcess Regionalization Program of China (in Chinese)

  • The Ministry of Water resourcess of the People’s Republic of China, 2012. National Main River and Lake Water Functional Regionalization (in Chinese)

  • Xia J, Feng HL, Zhan CS, Niu CW (2006) Determination of a reasonable percentage for ecological water-use in the Haihe River Basin, China. Pedosphere 1:33–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu JX (2004) A study of anthropogenic season rivers in China. Catena 55:17–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang ZF, Liu JL, Xiao F, Jiang J, Lin C (2005) Conformity calculation of river ecological basic flows in the Haihe River Basin. J Environ Sci 4:442–448 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang ZF, Sun T, Cui BS, Chen B, Chen GQ (2009) Environmental flow requirements for integrated water allocation in the Yellow River Basin, China. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 14:2469–2481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang W, Yang ZF, Qin Y (2011) An optimization approach for sustainable release of e-flows for lake restoration and preservation: model development and a case study of Baiyangdian Lake. Chi Ecol Mode 222:2448–2455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang ZF, Cui BS, Sun T, Chen H, Yang W (2012) The theory, modelling, and allocation of wetland environmental flow. Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang T, Liu JL, Chen QY, Zhang J, Yang Y (2013) Estimation of environmental flow requirements for the river ecosystem in the Haihe River Basin, China. Water Sci Technol 4:699–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu YD, Yang ZY, Liu YP, Qin DY, Liu JH (2010) Review of study on precipitation evolution of Haihe River Basin under changing environment. J Chin Hydrol 4:32–35 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Zheng BH, Wang XQ, Hu C (2007) Study on ecological instream flow of the Hun River and Taizi River in Liao River Basin. J Environ Sci 6:937–943 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The present study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41271496) and the National Water Pollution Control Major Project of China (No. 2012ZX07203-006).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jingling Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, T., Liu, J., Chen, Q. et al. Environmental flow assessment for improvement of ecological integrity in the Haihe River Basin, China. Ecotoxicology 23, 506–517 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-014-1219-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-014-1219-5

Keywords

Navigation