Skip to main content
Log in

A test of sensory exploitation in the swordtail characin (Corynopoma riisei) based on colour matching between female prey and a male ornament

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The sensory exploitation hypothesis states that pre-existing biases in female sensory systems may generate strong selection on male signals to match such biases. As environmental conditions differ between populations, sexual preferences resulting from natural selection are expected to vary as well. The swordtail characin (Corynopoma riisei) is a species in which males carry a flag-like ornament growing from the operculum that has been proposed to function as a prey mimic to attract females. Here, we investigated if female plasticity in feeding preferences is associated with plasticity in preference for an artificial male ornament in this species. Females were trained for 10 days by offering them differently coloured food items and were then tested for changes in preferences for differently coloured artificial male ornaments according to foraging experience. We found a rapid and pronounced change in female preference for the colouration of the artificial ornament according to food training. Thus our results support the possibility that sensory exploitation may act as a driving force for female preferences for male ornaments in this species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amcoff M, Arnqvist G, Kolm N (2009) Courtship signalling with a labile bilateral signal: males show their best side. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:1717–1725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnqvist G (2006) Sensory exploitation and sexual conflict. Phil Trans Roy Soc B 361:375–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnqvist G, Kolm N (2010) Population differentiation in the swordtail characin (Corynopoma riisei): a role for sensory drive? J Evol Biol 23:1907–1918

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arnqvist G, Rowe L (2005) Sexual conflict. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Boughman JW (2002) How sensory drive can promote speciation. Trends Ecol Evol 17:571–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaine AS, Lyon BE (2008) Adaptive plasticity in female mate choice dampens sexual selection on male ornaments in the lark bunting. Science 319:459–462

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Endler JA, Basolo AL (1998) Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection. Trends Ecol Evol 13:415–420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller RC (2009) A test of the critical assumption of the sensory bias model for the evolution of female mating preference using neural networks. Evolution 63:1697–1711

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller RC, Houle D, Travis J (2005) Sensory bias as an explanation for the evolution of mate preferences. Am Nat 166:437–446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garamszegi LZ, Calhim S, Dochtermann N, Hegyi G, Hurd PL, Jørgensen C, Kutsukake N, Lajeunesse MJ, Pollard KA, Schielzeth H, Symonds MRE, Nakagawa S (2009) Changing philosophies and tools for statistical inferences in behavioural ecology. Behav Ecol 20:1363–1375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grether GF, Kolluru GR, Rodd FH, de la Cerda J, Shimazaki K (2005) Carotenoid availability affects the development of a colour-based mate preference and the sensory bias to which it is genetically linked. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 272:2181–2188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadfield JD (2010) MCMC methods for multi-response generalised linear mixed models: the MCMCglmm R package. J Stat Soft 33:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath DD, Blouw DM (1998) Are maternal effects in fish adaptive or merely physiological side effects? In: Mousseau TA, Fox CW (eds) Maternal effects as adaptations. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 178–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennions MD, Petrie M (1997) Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol Rev 72:283–327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick M, Ryan MJ (1991) The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350:33–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko H, Brooks R, Jennions MD, Morley J (2003) The evolution of mate choice and mating biases. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 270:653–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolm N, Arnqvist G (2011) Environmental correlates of diet in the swordtail characin (Corynopoma riisei, Gill). Env Biol Fish 92:159–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolm N, Amcoff M, Mann RP, Arnqvist G (2012) Diversification of a food- mimicking male ornament via sensory drive. Curr Biol 22:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutaygil N (1959) Insemination, sexual differentiation and secondary sex characters in Stevardia albipinnis Gill. In: Istanbul University Fen Fakultesi Mecmuasi, Series B, pp 93–128

  • Lehtonen TK, Wong BBM, Lindström K (2010) Fluctuating mate preferences in a marine fish. Biol Lett 6:21–23

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Macías-Garcia C, Lemus YS (2012) Foraging costs drive female resistance to a sensory trap. Proc Roy Soc B 1736:2262–2268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macías-Garcia C, Ramirez E (2005) Evidence that sensory traps can evolve into honest signals. Nature 434:501–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy MA (2007) Bayesian methods for ecology. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mead LS, Arnold SJ (2004) Quantitative genetic models of sexual selection. Trends Ecol Evol 19:264–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milner RNC, Detto T, Jennions MD, Backwell PRY (2010) Experimental evidence for a seasonal shift in the strength of a female mating preference. Behav Ecol 21:311–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson K (1964) Behavior and morphology in the glandulocaudine fishes (Ostariophysi, Characidae). In: Davis J, Marler PR, Smith RI (eds) University of california publications in zoology, vol 75. University of California Press, Berkley, pp 59–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor HC (1991) Courtship in the water mite Neumania papillator: males capitalize on female adaptations for predation. Anim Behav 42:589–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qvarnström A (2001) Context-dependent genetic benefits from mate choice. Trends Ecol Evol 16:5–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Qvarnström A, Blomgren V, Wiley C, Svedin N (2004) Female collared flycatchers learn to prefer males with an artificial novel ornament. Behav Ecol 15:543–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2005) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna

  • Rodd FH, Hughes KA, Grether GF, Baril CT (2002) A possible non-sexual origin of mate preference: are male guppies mimicking fruit? Proc Roy Soc Lond B 269:475–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruxton GD, Sherratt TN, Speed MP (2004) Transparency and silvering. In: Ruxton GD, Sherratt TN, Speed MP (eds) Avoiding attack: the evolutionary ecology of crypsis, warning signals and mimicry. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 38–49

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Saetre G-P, Moum T, Bures S, Král M, Adamjan M, Moreno J (1997) A sexually selected character displacement in flycatchers reinforces premating isolation. Nature 387:589–592

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith C, Barber I, Wootton RJ, Chittka L (2004) A receiver bias in the origin of three- spined stickleback mate choice. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 271:949–955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walling CA, Royle NJ, Lindström J, Metcalfe NB (2008) Experience-induced preference for short-sworded males in the green swordtail, Xiphophorus helleri. Anim Behav 76:271–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard MJ (1983) The maintenance of sex as a developmental trap due to sexual selection. Q Rev Biol 58:155–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickler W (1968) Mimicry in plants and animals. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JJ (2001) Widespread loss of sexually selected traits: how the peacock lost its spots. Trends Ecol Evol 16:517–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaret TM (1972) Invisible prey, and the nature of polymorphism in the Cladocera (class Crustacea). Limn Oceanogr 17:171–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaret TM, Kerfoot WC (1975) Fish predation on Bosima longirostris: body-size selection versus visibility selection. Ecology 56:232–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Ted Morrow, Göran Arnqvist, Björn Rogell, Simone Immler, Amber Rice and Fernando Mateos-González for comments on the manuscript. Thanks also to Björn Rogell and Arild Husby for help with the statistical analyses and Anders Ödeen for help with producing the reflectance spectra. This study was funded by the Swedish Research Council (grant to N. K.) and was approved by Uppsala Animal Research Ethical Board (application C263/6).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mirjam Amcoff.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 113 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amcoff, M., Kolm, N. A test of sensory exploitation in the swordtail characin (Corynopoma riisei) based on colour matching between female prey and a male ornament. Environ Biol Fish 97, 247–254 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-013-0147-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-013-0147-1

Keywords

Navigation