Abstract
By comparing the Bertalanffy descriptive growth equation (BG) with a reproductive-allocation growth (RAG) equation, I show that the BG k parameter is approximately equal to about 0.55 times the proportion of an adult body mass given to reproduction per unit of time, the reproductive effort; thus, k may be useful in predicting average fecundity. This also means that the Beverton–Holt k/M dimensionless number is really a lifetime reproductive allocation since the average adult life span is about 1/M years.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beverton RJH (1992) Patterns of reproductive strategy parameters in some marine teleost fishes. J Fish Biol 41:137–160
Beverton RJH, Holt SJ (1959) A review of the life spans and mortality rates of fish in nature and the relation to growth and other physiological characteristics. In: Ciba foundation colloquia in ageing V. The life span of animals. Churchill, London, pp 144–177
Charnov EL (1993) Life history invariants. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 167
Charnov EL (2002) Reproductive effort, offspring size and benefit/cost ratios in the classification of life histories. Evol Ecol Res 4:749–758
Charnov EL (2005) Reproductive effort is inversely proportional to average adult life span. Evol Ecol Res 7:1221–1222
Charnov EL, Turner TF, Winemiller KO (2001) Reproductive constraints and the evolution of life histories with indeterminate growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:9460–9464
Charnov EL, Moses M, Warne R (2007) Lifetime reproductive effort. Am Nat 170:E129–E142
Day T, Taylor PD (1997) Von Bertalanffy’s growth equation should not be used to model age and size at maturity. Am Nat 149:381–393
Gunderson DR (1997) Trade-off between reproductive effort and adult survival in oviparous and viviparous fishes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54:990–998
Jensen AL (1996) Beverton and Holt life history invariants result from optimal trade-off of reproduction and survival. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53:820–822
Lester NP, Shuter BJ, Abrams PA (2004) Interpreting the von Bertalanffy model of somatic growth in fishes: the cost of reproduction. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:1625–1631
Pauly D (1980) On the interrelationships between natural mortality, growth parameters and mean environmental temperature in 175 fish stocks. J Cons Int Explor Mer 39:175–192
Roff DA (1983) An allocation model of growth and reproduction in fish. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 40:1395–1404
Shuter BJ, Lester NP, LaRose JJ, Purchase CF, Vascotto K, Morgan G, Collins NC, Abrams PA (2005) Optimal life histories and food web position: linkages among somatic growth, reproductive investment, and mortality. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 62:738–746
Von Bertalanffy L (1938) A quantitative theory of organic growth. Human Biol 10:181–213
Acknowledgments
I thank Don Gunderson and David Sampson for useful discussion, and UNM for summer salary.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Charnov, E.L. Fish growth: Bertalanffy k is proportional to reproductive effort. Environ Biol Fish 83, 185–187 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-007-9315-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-007-9315-5