Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Re-exploring the Trade and Environment Nexus Through the Diffusion of Pollution

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Some scholars argue that trade liberalization results in the ‘outsourcing’ of pollution to pollution havens, and this may explain the existence of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) in industrialized countries. Others claim that trade liberalization effectively lessens pollution by allowing a more efficient use of resources and the diffusion of clean technologies. In part because these theories generate similar predictions for industrialized countries, empirical studies have not provided conclusive evidence for either argument. To identify the role of trade, I draw on the insights of the diffusion literature and estimate a spatial regression model where trade operates as the mechanism through which pollution shifts from country to country. Using the case of per-capita carbon dioxide \((\hbox {CO}_2)\) emissions, I find that once spatial correlation is accounted for, the EKC disappears. The effect is even stronger when looking at trade from developing countries only, providing support for the pollution haven hypothesis. I also show that the \(\hbox {CO}_2\) trajectory of developing countries goes above the one previously followed by industrialized countries. This suggests that developing countries carry on an additional carbon burden above the one that would be obtained in the absence of trade. These findings contribute to the literature on the non-economic effects of trade and the constraints of domestic policies when the costs of trade are low.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Data from Hoekman and Kostecki (2001) and the WTO [(Trade growth to ease in 2011 but despite 2010 record surge, crisis hangover persists, http://www.wto.org/english/news_e/pres11_e/pr628_e.htm#table3 (accessed on August 10, 2012)].

  2. Trade is also a direct source of pollution through the transportation of goods (Krautzberger and Wetzel 2012), an aspect which this paper does not consider.

  3. “Barroso trade threat on climate” BBC News January 22, 2008 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7201835.stm (accessed on August 10, 2011).

  4. “Nafta, Meet the Environment” New York Times July 12, 1993.

  5. I thank an anonymous reviewer for this suggestion.

  6. A more detailed presentation of this test is offered in Section A3 in the Appendix.

References

  • Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ayres RU (1993) Cowboys, cornucopians and long-run sustainability. Ecol Econ 8(3):189–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan P (1997) Corruption and development: a review of issues. J Econ Lit 35(3):1320–1346

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel MM, Tosun J (2009) Changing economic openness for policy convergence: when can trade agreements induce convergence of environmental regulation? Int Stud Q 53(4):931–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck N, Gleditsch KS, Beardsley K (2006) Space is more than geography: using spatial econometrics in the study of political economy. Int Stud Q 50(1):27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beladi H, Oladi R (2011) Does trade liberalization increase global pollution? Resour Energy Econ 33(1):172–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernauer T, Koubi V (2009) Effects of political institutions on air quality. Ecol Econ 68(5):1355–1365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boden TA, Marland G, Andres RJ (2010) Global, regional, and national fossil-fuel CO\(_{2}\) emissions. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge

  • Busch P-O, Jörgens H (2005) International patterns of environmental policy change and convergence. Eur Environ 15(1):80–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chichilnisky G (1994) North-south trade and the global environment. Am Econ Rev 84(4):851–874

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole MA (2004) Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve: examining the linkages. Ecol Econ 48(1):71–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland BR, Taylor MS (1994) North-south trade and the environment. Q J Econ 109(3):755–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta S, Laplante B, Wang H, Wheeler D (2002) Confronting the environmental Kuznets curve. J Econ Perspect 16(1):147–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deardorff AV (1998) Determinants of bilateral trade: does gravity work in a neoclassical world? In: Frankel JA (ed) In the regionalization of the world economy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekins P, Folke C, Costanza R (1994) Trade, environment and development: the issues in perspective. Ecol Econ 9(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elhorst JP (2003) Specification and estimation of spatial panel sata models. Int Reg Sci Rev 26(3):244–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elhorst JP (2012) Dynamic spatial panels: models, methods, and inferences. J Geogr Syst 14(1):5–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans P (1997) The eclipse of the state? Reflections on stateness in an era of globalization. World Polit 50(1):62–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel JA, Rose AK (2005) Is trade good or bad for the environment? Sorting out the causality. Rev Econ Stat 87(1):85–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franzen A, Meyer R (2010) Environmental attitudes in cross-national perspective: a multilevel analysis of the ISSP 1993 and 2000. Eur Sociol Rev 26(2):219–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franzese RJ, Hays JC (2007) Spatial econometric models of cross-sectional interdependence in political science panel and time-series-cross-section data. Politi Anal 15(2):140–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franzese RJ, Hays JC (2008) Interdependence in comparative politics: substance, theory, empirics, substance. Comp Polit Stud 41(4–5):742–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleditsch Kristian S (2002) Expanded trade and GDP data. J Conf Resolut 46:712–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grether JM, De Melo J (2003) Globalization and dirty industries: do pollution havens matter? NBER Working Paper 9776: 1–32

  • Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. NBER Working Paper W3914

  • Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ 110(2):353–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas PM (1989) Do regimes matter? Epistemic communities and Mediterranean pollution control. Int Organ 43(3):377–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harbaugh WT, Levinson A, Wilson DM (2002) Reexamining the empirical evidence for an environmental Kuznets curve. Rev Econ Stat 84(3):541–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin GJ (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243–1248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hays JC, Kachi A, Franzese RJ (2010) A spatial model incorporating dynamic, endogenous network interdependence: a political science application. Stat Methodol 7:406–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho DE, Imai K, King G, Stuart EA (2007) Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Polit Anal 15(3):199–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekman B, Kostecki MM (2001) The political economy of the world trading system: the WTO and beyond. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kelejian HH, Prucha IR (1998) A generalized spatial two-stage least squares procedure for estimating a spatial autoregressive model with autoregressive disturbances. J R Estate Finance Econ 17(1):99–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleemann L, Abdulai A (2013) The impact of trade and economic growth on the environment: revisiting the cross-country evidence. J Int Dev 25(2):180–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krautzberger L, Wetzel H (2012) Transport and \(\text{ CO }_2\): productivity growth and carbon dioxide emissions in the European commercial transport industry. Environ Resour Econ 53(3):435–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanjouw JO, Mody A (1996) Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technology. Res Policy 25(4):549–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leamer EE (1995) The Heckscher–Ohlin model in theory and practice. Princeton Studies in International Finance, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard HJ (1988) Pollution and the struggle for the world product: multinational corporations, environment, and international comparative advantage. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • LeSage J, Pace RK (2009) Introduction to spatial econometrics. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lomborg B (2001) The skeptical environmentalist: measuring the real state of the world. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maddison A (2007) The world economy: historical statistics. OECD Publishing, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall MG (2010) Polity IV project: political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2009. Technical report University of Maryland

  • Murray MP (2006) Avoiding invalid instruments and coping with weak instruments. J Econ Perspect 20(4):111–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musolesi A, Mazzanti M, Zoboli R (2010) A panel data heterogeneous Bayesian estimation of environmental Kuznets curves for \(\text{ CO }_2\) emissions. Appl Econ 42(18):2275–2287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer E (2002) Do democracies exhibit stronger international environmental commitment? A cross-country analysis. J Peace Res 39(2):139–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer E, Plümper T (2010) Spatial effects in dyadic data. Int Organ 64(1):145–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nimubona A-D (2012) Pollution policy and trade liberalization of environmental goods. Environ Resour Econ 53(3):323–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson M (1965) The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters GP, Minx JC, Weber CL, Edenhofer O (2011) Growth in emission transfers via international trade from 1990 to 2008. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(21):8903–8908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plümper Thomas, Neumayer Eric (2009) Model specification in the analysis of spatial dependence. Eur J Polit Res 49(3):418–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plümper T, Troeger VE, Winner H (2009) Why is there no race to the bottom in capital taxation? Int Stud Q 53(3):761–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prakash A, Potoski M (2006) Racing to the bottom? Trade, environmental governance, and ISO 14001. Am J Polit Sci 50(2):350–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selden TM, Song D (1995) Neoclassical growth, the J curve for abatement, and the inverted U curve for pollution. J Environ Econ Manag 29(2):162–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons BA, Elkins Z (2004) The globalization of liberalization: policy diffusion in the international political economy. Am Polit Sci Rev 98(1):171–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon JL (1998) The ultimate resource II. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) (2007) Contribution of working Group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press

  • Stern DI (2004) The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Dev 32(8):1419–1439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobey JA (1990) The effects of domestic environmental policies on patterns of orld trade: an empirical test. Kyklos 43:191–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel D (1995) Trading up: consumer and environmental regulation in a global economy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • World Resources Institute (2010) Climate analysis indicators tool (CAIT) 8. Technical report World Resource Institute Washington, DC

Download references

Acknowledgments

For comments and suggestions, I wish to thank Neal Beck, Thomas Bernauer, Sarah Castleman, Kemi Fuentes-George, S.P.  Harish, Jude Hays, Jennifer Hill, James Hollyer, Franziska Keller, Chris Marcoux, Jonathan Nagler, Shanker Satyanath, Hannah Simpson, Johannes Urpelainen, as well as seminar participants at the 2011 IPES conference, the 2012 MPSA conference, the University of Pittsburgh, and at ETHZ/University of Zürich. I am also grateful for comments from two anonymous reviewers. All errors are my own.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michaël Aklin.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (pdf 338 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aklin, M. Re-exploring the Trade and Environment Nexus Through the Diffusion of Pollution. Environ Resource Econ 64, 663–682 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-015-9893-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-015-9893-1

Keywords

Navigation