Skip to main content
Log in

Endogenous Minimum Participation in International Environmental Treaties

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many international treaties come into force only after a minimum number of countries have signed and ratified the treaty. Minimum participation constraints are particularly frequent in the case of environmental treaties dealing with global commons, where free-riding incentives are strong. Why do countries that know they have an incentive to free-ride accept to “tie their hands” through the introduction of a minimum participation constraint? This article addresses the above issues by modeling the formation of an international treaty as a three-stage non-cooperative coalition formation game. Both the equilibrium minimum participation constraint and the number of signatories—the coalition size—are determined. This article, by showing that a non-trivial partial coalition, sustained by a binding minimum participation constraint, forms at the equilibrium, explains the occurrence of minimum participation clauses in most international environmental agreements. It also analyses the endogenous equilibrium size of the minimum participation constraint.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrett S (1994) Self-enforcing international environmental agreements. Oxf Econ Pap 46: 878–894

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett S (1997) Towards a theory of international cooperation. In: Carraro C, Siniscalco D (eds) New directions in the economic theory of the environment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett S (2003) Environment and statecraft. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett S (2007) Why cooperate? the incentive to supply global public goods. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Black J, Levi MD, de Meza D (1992) Creating a good a atmosphere. Minimum participation for tackling the greenhouse effect. Economica 60: 281–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloch F (1996) Sequential formation of coalition with fixed payoff division. Games Econ Behav 14: 90–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloch F (1997) Non-cooperative models of coalition formation in games with spillovers. In: Carraro C, Siniscalco D (eds) New directions in the economic theory of the environment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Botteon M, Carraro C (1997) Strategies for environmental negotiations: issue linkage with heterogeneous countries. In: Folmer H, Hanley N (eds) Game Theory and the Global Environment. E. Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Carraro C (ed) (1997) International environmental agreements: strategic policy issues. E. Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Carraro C, Marchiori C (2003) Stable coalitions. In: Carraro C (eds) The endogenous formation of economic coalitions. E. Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Carraro C, Siniscalco D (1992) The international protection of the environment: voluntary agreements among sovereign countries. In: Dasgupta P, Maler KG, Vercelli A (eds) The economics of transnational commons. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Carraro C, Siniscalco D (1993) Strategies for the international protection of the environment. J Public Econ 52: 309–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carraro C, Siniscalco D (1995) Policy coordination for sustainability: commitments, transfers, and linked negotiations. In: Goldin I, Winters A (eds) The economics of sustainable development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Carraro C, Siniscalco D (1998) International environmental agreements. Incentives and political economy. Eur Econ Rev 42: 561–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chander P, Tulkens H (1995) A core-theoretical solution for the design of cooperative agreements on trans-frontier pollution. Int Tax Public Financ 2: 279–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chander P, Tulkens H (1997) The core of an economy with multilateral environmental externalities. Int J Game Theory 26: 379–401

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Aspremont CA, Jacquemin A, Gabszewicz JJ, Weymark J (1983) On the stability of collusive price leadership. Can J Econ 16: 17–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamantoudi E, Sartzetakis E (2006) Stable international environmental agreements: an analytical approach. J Public Econ Theory 8: 247–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finus M (2003) Stability and design of international environmental agreements: the case of global and transboundary pollution. In: Folmer H, Tietenberg T (eds) International yearbook of environmental and resource economics, 2002/3. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Finus M (2008) Game theoretic research on the design of international environmental agreements: insights, critical remarks and future challenges. Int Rev Environ Resour Econ 2: 1–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray D, Vohra R (1997) Equilibrium binding agreements. J Econ Theory 73: 30–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray D, Vohra R (1999) A theory of endogenous coalition structure. Games Econ Behav 26: 286–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubio S, Ulph A (2006) Self-enforcing international environmental agreements revisited. Oxf Econ Pap 58: 233–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutz S (2001) Minimum participation rules and the effectiveness of multilateral environmental agreements, Working paper 01/22, Centre for Economic Research, SFIT, Zurich

  • Tulkens H (1998) Cooperation versus Free-riding in international environmental affairs: two approaches. In: Folmer H, Hanley N (eds) Game theory and the global environment, E. Elgar, Cheltenham. Also in Carraro C (ed) Governing the global environment, E. Elgar, Cheltenham, 2002

  • Yi SS (1997) Stable coalition structures with externalities. Games Econ Behav 20: 201–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi SS (2003) Endogenous formation of economic coalitions. Asurveyofthepartitionfunctionapproach. In: Carraro C (eds) The endogenous formation of economic coalitions. E. Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlo Carraro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carraro, C., Marchiori, C. & Oreffice, S. Endogenous Minimum Participation in International Environmental Treaties. Environ Resource Econ 42, 411–425 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-009-9264-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-009-9264-x

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation