Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Carbon leakage revisited: unilateral climate policy with directed technical change

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using a stylized theoretical model, we argue that current economic analyses of climate policy tend to over-estimate the degree of carbon leakage, as they abstract from the effects of induced technological change. We analyse carbon leakage in a two-country model with directed technical change, where only one of the countries enforces an exogenous cap on emissions. Climate policy induces changes in relative prices, that cause carbon leakage through a terms-of-trade effect. However, these changes in relative prices also affect the incentives to innovate in different sectors. This leads to a counterbalancing induced-technology effect, which always reduces carbon leakage. We therefore conclude that the leakage rates reported in the literature may be too high, as these estimates neglect the effect of price changes on the incentives to innovate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acemoglu D (1998) Why do new technologies complement skills?. Directed technical change and wage inequality. Q J Econ 113:1055–1089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu D (2002) Directed technical change. Rev Econ Stud 69:781–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu D (2007) Equilibrium bias of technology. Econometrica forthcoming

  • Babiker MH (2005) Climate change policy, market structure and carbon leakage. J Int Econ 65:421–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett S (1994) Self-enforcing international environmental agreements. Oxf Econ Pap 46:878–894

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates RW, Moore EA (1992) Commercial energy efficiency and the environment. World Bank Working Paper Series 972, World Bank

  • Burniaux J, Oliveira-Martins J (2000) Carbon emission leakages: a general equilibrium view. OECD Economics Department Working Paper 242, OECD Economics Department

  • Carraro C, Siniscalco D (1998) International environmental agreements: incentives and political economy. Eur Econ Rev 42:561–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2005) Free trade and global warming: a trade theory view of the KYOTO PROTOCOL. J Environ Econ Manage 49:205–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Maria C, Smulders S (2004) Trade pessimists vs technology optimists: induced technical change and pollution havens. Adv Econ Anal Policy 4(2) article 7

  • Drandakis E, Phelps E (1965) A model of induced invention, growth and distribution. Econ J CXXVI:823–840

    Google Scholar 

  • Espey M (1998) Gasoline demand revisited: an international meta-analysis of elasticities. Energy Econ 20:273–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gately D, Huntington HG (2002) The asymmetric effects of changes in price and income on energy and oil demand. Energy J 23(1):19–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Golombek R, Hoel M (2004) Unilateral emission reductions and cross-country technology spillovers. Adv Econ Anal Policy 4(2) article 3

  • Grubb M, Chapuis T, Ha Duong M (1995) The economics of changing course: implications of adaptability and inertia for optimal climate policy. Energy Policy 23(4/5):417–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks J (1932) The theory of wages. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoel M (1991) Global environmental problems: the effects of unilateral actions taken by one country. J Environ Econ Manage 20:55–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy C (1964) Induced bias in innovation and the theory of distribution. Econ J LXXIV:541–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuik O (2005) Climate change policies, international trade, and carbon leakage: an applied general equilibrium analysis. Ph.D. thesis, Free University, Amsterdam

  • Light M, Kolstad CD, Rutherford TF (2000) Coal markets, carbon leakage and the KYOTO PROTOCOL. Center for Economic Analysis Working Paper 23, University of Colorado at Boulder

  • Newell R, Jaffe A, Stavins R (1999) The induced innovation hypothesis and energy-saving technological change. Q J Econ 114:941–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck RS, Rotemberg JJ (1983) Dynamic factor demands and the effects of energy price shocks. Am Econ Rev 73(5):1066–1079

    Google Scholar 

  • Popp D (2001) The effect of new technology on energy consumption. Resour Energy Econ 23:215–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popp D (2002) Induced innovation and energy prices. Am Econ Rev 92:160–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivera-Batiz LA, Romer PM (1991) Technological differences. Q J Econ CXVI:531–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silberberg E (1990) The structure of economics: a mathematical analysis. 2nd edn. MacGraw Hill, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Taheri AA, Stevenson R (2002) Energy price, environmental policy, and technological bias. Energy J 23(4):85–107

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Corrado Di Maria.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maria, C.D., van der Werf, E. Carbon leakage revisited: unilateral climate policy with directed technical change. Environ Resource Econ 39, 55–74 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9091-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9091-x

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation