Abstract
‘Green’ markets represent a means through which public goods can be privately provided. A green product is an impure public good consisting of a private good (e.g., rain forest honey) bundled with a jointly produced public good (e.g., biodiversity protection). In the context of ecosystem protection, popular green commodities include eco-tourism excursions, coffee grown under forest canopies (‘shade-grown’), tagua nuts for buttons and ornaments, rainforest nuts and oils for cosmetic products, and rain forest honey. We examine the dynamic efficiency of eco-friendly price premiums in achieving ecosystem protection and rural welfare goals by contrasting the use of price premiums to the use of payments that are tied directly to ecosystem protection. We demonstrate analytically and empirically that direct payments are likely to be more efficient as a conservation policy instrument. Depending on the available funds, the direct payments may be better or worse than green price premiums in achieving rural welfare objectives. If direct payments are not feasible for social or political reasons, we demonstrate analytically and empirically that the price premium approach is likely to be more effective at achieving conservation and development objectives than the currently more popular policy of subsidizing capital acquisition in eco-friendly commercial activities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
H. J. Albers J. Muller (2004) ArticleTitle‘Enforcement, Payments, and Development Projects near Protected Areas: How the Market Setting Determines What Works Where’ Resource and Energy Economics 26 IssueID2 185–204 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.reseneeco.2003.11.007
A. A. Ambougou (1993) Approche sur la conservation de la biodiversité par la modernisation de l’apiculture en Côte d’Ivoire: Exemple la région de TAFIRE Institut de Recherche en Ecologie Tropicale Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire
G. Borrini-Feyerabend (1997) Beyond Fences: Seeking Social Sustainability in Conservation IUCN Gland, Switzerland
J. M. Conrad (1999) Resource Economics Cambridge University Press New York
R. Cornes T. Sandler (1996) The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods and Club Goods EditionNumber2 Cambridge University Press New York
Ferraro, P. J. (1994), Natural Resource Use in the Southeastern Rain Forests of Madagascar and the Local Impacts of Establishing the Ranomafana National Park. Masters Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Duke University, Durham, NC
P. J. Ferraro A. Kiss (2002) ArticleTitle‘Getting What You Paid For: Direct Payments as an Alternative Investment for Conserving Biodiversity’ Science 268 1718–1719 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.1078104
Ferraro, P. J. and D. Razafimamonjy (1993), Alternatives to Destruction: Steps toward Sustainable Use of the Malagasy Rain Forest. Final Technical Report. Biodiversity Support Project #7529. Washington, DC: Biodiversity Support Program (World Wildlife Fund)
P. J. Ferraro R. D. Simpson (2002) ArticleTitleThe Cost-Effectiveness of Conservation Payments Land Economics 78 IssueID3 339–353
Ferraro, P.J. and R.D. Simpson (forthcoming), ‘Cost-Effective Conservation When Eco-Entrepreneurs Have Market Power’, Environment and Development Economics 10(5)
C. Fuest B. Huber (2000) ArticleTitle‘Why do Governments Subsidize Investment and Not Employment?’ Journal of Public Economics 78 171–192 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00115-2
J. Green E. Sheshinski (1976) ArticleTitle‘Direct versus Indirect Remedies for Externalities’ The Journal of Political Economy 84 IssueID4 797–808 Occurrence Handle10.1086/260477
J. Hardner R. Rice (2002) ArticleTitle‘Rethinking Green Consumerism’ Scientific American May 89–95
C. F. Kiker F. E. Putz (1997) ArticleTitle‘Ecological [sic] Certification of Forest Products: Economic Challenges’ Ecological Economics 20 IssueIDJanuary 37–51 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0921-8009(96)00076-6
S. L. Pimm M. Ayres (2001) ArticleTitle‘Can We Defy Nature’s End?’ Science 293 2207–2208 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.1061626 Occurrence Handle11567124
InstitutionalAuthorNamePPNR (Projet Parc National Ranomafana). (1995) Plan Annuel de Travail du Projet Parc National Ranomafana 1995 (Janvier) Antananarivo Madagascar
Ralimanana, H. (1994), Contribution la connaissance de l’apiculture et la melisso palynologie dans le Parc National de Ranomafana, Universite´ d’Antananarivo: Memoire de D.E.A. en Science Biologiques.
A. Sandmo (1976) ArticleTitle‘Direct versus Indirect Pigouvian Taxation’ European Economic Review 7 337–349 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0014-2921(78)90010-7
J. Stevens M. Ahmad S. Ruddell (1998) ArticleTitle‘Forest Products Certification: A Survey of Producers and Manufacturers’ Forest Products Journal 48 IssueIDJune 43–52
R. A. Sedjo S. K. Swallow (2002) ArticleTitle‘Voluntary Eco-Labeling and the Price Premium’ Land Economics 78 IssueID2 272–284
S. Swallow R. Sedjo (2000) ArticleTitle‘Eco-Labelling Consequences in General Equilibrium: A Graphical Assessment’ Land Economics 76 28–36
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ferraro, P.J., Uchida, T. & Conrad, J.M. Price Premiums for Eco-friendly Commodities: Are ‘Green’ Markets the Best Way to Protect Endangered Ecosystems?. Environ Resource Econ 32, 419–438 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-005-7962-6
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-005-7962-6