Abstract
Recently an abundance of experimental evidence has been gathered that is consonant with the notion that individual preferences are inconsistent and unstable. These empirical results potentially undermine the theoretical foundation of welfare economics, as the degree of preference lability claimed suggests that perhaps no optimization principles underlie even the most straightforward of choices. Yet policymakers in the environmental arena continue to prescribe policies based on economics-based methods that are constructed on the very principles that have been directly refuted. Are policymakers creatures of habit that move at glacial speed or is there something deeper behind their inertness? In this study, I explore this issue within the U.S. context and argue that there is some rationality behind current public policy decisionmaking. I then explore whether the empirical evidence supports the view that policymakers should take preference anomalies seriously. As a case study, I focus on some of my recent findings on preference inconsistencies in the marketplace.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alevy, J., J. A. List and W. Adamowicz (2002), “More Is Less’ Preference Reversals and Non-Market Valuation”, working paper, University of Maryland.
I. Bateman A. Munro B. Rhodes C. Starmer R. Sugden (1997) ArticleTitle‘A Test of the Theory of Reference-Dependent Preferences’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 IssueID2, May 479–505 Occurrence Handle10.1162/003355397555262
Bazerman, M. H., G. F. Loewenstein and S. Blount White (1992) ‘Reversals of Preference in Allocation Decisions: Judging an Alternative Versus Choosing Among Alternatives’, Administrative Science Quarterly 23, 220–240.
D. Brookshire D. Coursey (1987) ArticleTitle‘Measuring the Value of a Public Good: An Empirical Comparison of Elicitation Procedures’ American Economic Review 77 IssueID4, September 554–566
D. Brookshire A. Randall J. R. Stoll (1980) ArticleTitle‘Value Increments and Decrements in Natural Resource Service Flows’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 62 IssueID3 185–193 Occurrence Handle10.2307/1240202
Carson, R., T. Groves, J. A. List and M. Machina (2002) ‘Probabilistic Influence and Supplemental Benefits: A Field Test of the Two Key Assumptions Underlying Stated Preferences’. Working Paper: University of California, San Diego.
D. Coursey J. Hovis W. Schulze (1987) ArticleTitle‘The Disparity Between Willingness to Accept and Willingness to Pay Measures of Value’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 102 IssueID3 679–690 Occurrence Handle10.2307/1884223
I. M. Gordon J. L. Knetsch (1979) ArticleTitle‘Consumer′s Surplus Measures and the Evaluation of Resources’ Land Economics 55 IssueID1, February 1–10 Occurrence Handle10.2307/3145954
J. Hammack G. Brown (1974) Waterfowl and Wetlands: Toward Bioeconomic Analysis The Johns Hopkins University Press for Resources for the Future Baltimore
W. M. Hanemann (1991) ArticleTitle‘Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept: How Much Can They Differ?’ American Economic Review 81 IssueID3, June 635–647
G. W. Harrison J.A. List (2004) ArticleTitle‘Field Experiments’ Journal of Economic Literature XLII 1009–1055 Occurrence Handle10.1257/0022051043004577
J. K. Horowitz K.E. McConnell ( (2002)) ArticleTitle‘A Review of WTA/WTP Studies’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44 426–447 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jeem.2001.1215
C. K. Hsee (1998) ArticleTitle‘Less is Better: When Low-Value Options Are Valued More Highly Than High-Valued Options’ Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 11 107–121 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199806)11:2<107::AID-BDM292>3.0.CO;2-Y
J. Huber P. John P. Christopher (1982) ArticleTitle‘Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity and the Similarity Hypothesis’ Journal of Consumer Research 9 IssueIDJune 90–98 Occurrence Handle10.1086/208899
D. Kahneman (1986) Comments by Professor Daniel Kahneman R. G. Cummings D. S. Brookshire W. D. Schulze (Eds) Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method. Rowman and Allanheld Totowa, NJ
D. Kahneman J. L. Knetsch R. H. Thaler (1990) ArticleTitle‘Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem’ Journal of Political Economy 98 IssueID6, December 1325–1348 Occurrence Handle10.1086/261737
J. L. Knetsch (1989) ArticleTitle‘The Endowment Effect and Evidence of Nonreversible Indifference Curves’ American Economic Review 79 IssueID5, December 1277–1284
J. L. Knetsch (1990) ArticleTitle‘Environmental Policy Implications of Disparities between Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded Measures of Values’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 18 227–237 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0095-0696(90)90003-H
Knetsch, J. L. (2002) ‘Policy Analysis and Design with Losses Valued More than Gains and Varying Rates of Time Preference’, in R. Gowda and J.C. Fox, eds., Judgements, Decisions, and Public Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
P. Knez V. L. Smith A. Williams (1985) ArticleTitle‘Individual Rationality, Market Rationality, and Value Estimation’ American Economic Review 75 IssueID2, May 397–402
J. A. List (2002) ArticleTitle‘Preference Reversals of a Different Kind: The More is Less Phenomenon’ American Economic Review 92 IssueID5 1636–1643 Occurrence Handle10.1257/000282802762024692
J. A. List (2003) ArticleTitle‘Does Market Experience Eliminate Market Anomalies?’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 IssueID1 41–71 Occurrence Handle10.1162/00335530360535144
J. A. List ((2004a)) ArticleTitle‘Neoclassical Theory Versus Prospect Theory: Evidence from the Marketplace’ Econometrica 72 IssueID2 615–625 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00502.x
J. A. ListItem (2004b) ArticleTitle‘Substitutability, Experience, and the Value Disparity: Evidence from the Marketplace’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 47 IssueID3 486–509 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.jeem.2003.05.001
List, J. A. (2004c) ‘Using Hicksian Surplus Measures to Examine Consistency of Individual Preferences: Theory and Experimental Evidence’, Scandanavian Journal of Economics, forthcoming.
J. List J. Shogren (1999) ArticleTitle‘Price Signals and Bidding Behavior in Second-Price Auctions with Repeated Trials’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88 942–949 Occurrence Handle10.2307/1244336
G. Loewenstein (1999) ArticleTitle‘Experimental Economics from the Vantage-Point of Behavioural Economics’ Economic Journal 109 IssueIDFebruary F25–F34 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1468-0297.00400
Loewenstein, G. and D. Kahneman (1991) ‘Explaining the Endowment Effect’, Working paper, Carnegie Mellon.
G. Loomes S. Chris S. Robert (2003) ArticleTitle‘Do Anomalies Disappear in Repeated Markets’ Economic Journal 113 C153–C166 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1468-0297.00108
M. Myagkov C. Plott (1997) ArticleTitle‘Exchange Economies and Loss Exposure: Experiments Exploring Prospect Theory and Competitive Equilibria in Market Environments’ American Economic Review 87 IssueID5, December 801–828
C. R. Plott (1996) Rational Individual Behavior in Markets and Social Choice Processes: the Discovered Preference Hypothesis J. A. Kenneth C. Enrico P. Mark S. Christian (Eds) The Rational Foundations of Economic Behavior Macmillan London 225–250
Plott, C. R. and K. Zeiler (2003) ‘The WTP/WTA Gap, the “Endowment Effect” and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations’, working paper, California Institute of Technology.
A. Randall J. R. Stoll (1980) ArticleTitle‘Consumer’s Surplus in Commodity Space’ American Economic Review 71 IssueID3 449–457
R. D. Rowe R. C. d’Arge D. S. Brookshire (1980) ArticleTitle‘An Experiment on the Economic Value of Visibility’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 7 1–19 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0095-0696(80)90018-2
W. D. Schulze R. C. d’Arge D. S. Brookshire (1981) ArticleTitle‘Valuing Environmental Commodities: Some Recent Experiments’ Land Economics 57 IssueID2 151–172 Occurrence Handle10.2307/3145783
I. Simonson A. Tversky (1992) ArticleTitle‘A Choice in Context-Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness Aversion’ Journal of Marketing Research 29 IssueID3 281–295 Occurrence Handle10.2307/3172740
P. Slovic S. Lichtenstein (1968) ArticleTitle‘Relative Importance of Probabilities and Payoffs in Risk-Taking’ Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs 78 1–18
C. Starmer (1999) ArticleTitle‘Cycling with Rules of Thumb: An Experimental Test for a New From of Non-Transitive Behaviour’ Theory and Decision 46 141–158 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1004930205037
R. Sugden (2005) ArticleTitle‘Coping with Preference Anomalies in Cost--Benefit Analysis: a Market-Simulation Approach’ Environmental & Resource Economics 32 129–160 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10640-005-6031-5
R. Thaler (1980) ArticleTitle‘Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice’ Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1 39–60 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0167-2681(80)90051-7
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
JEL classifications: Q26, C93
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
List, J.A. Scientific Numerology, Preference Anomalies, and Environmental Policymaking. Environ Resource Econ 32, 35–53 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-005-6027-1
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-005-6027-1