Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A self-determination theory into the psychological needs of CALL: Probing EFL teachers’ autobiographical narratives

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Addressing psychological needs in computer-assisted language learning (CALL) has a critical role in developing learners’ motivation to use CALL-related materials. Taking a self-determination theory into the psychological needs of CALL, the primary purpose of this study was to explore to what extent English as a foreign language (EFL) teachers address the psychological needs when they attempt to introduce CALL materials to their learners. Second, the study sought to understand the EFL teachers’ preferences of CALL materials considering their psychological needs coverage. The autobiographical narratives of eight EFL teachers were collected through a descriptive narrative design. The narratives were analyzed by using a deductive-inductive thematic analysis. The findings indicated that EFL teachers addressed the three psychological needs of CALL and believed that they are critical in helping EFL learners use CALL materials. The findings of the Code Map showed that the EFL teachers had three major preferences to introduce CALL materials covering psychological needs: first, materials comprising competence, autonomy, learners’ proficiency level, competence-relatedness, cognitive involvement, and accessibility; second, materials including autonomy, learners’ personality traits, and relatedness; and third, materials addressing learners’ needs, autonomy-relatedness, and autonomy-competence. Therefore, it can be concluded that EFL teachers believed in the importance of psychological needs in suggesting CALL-related materials to develop their learners’ motivation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Adopted from Braun & Clarke, 2006, p. 87)

Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alamer, A., & Al Khateeb, A. (2021). Effects of using the WhatsApp application on language learners motivation: a controlled investigation using structural equation modelling. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1903042

  • Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C. K., & Walker, D. (2014). Introduction to research in education. Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, C. M., & Stewart, C. (2011). Self-determination theory and web-enhanced course template development. Teaching of Psychology, 38(3), 180–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butz, N. T., & Stupnisky, R. H. (2017). Improving student relatedness through an online discussion intervention: The application of self-determination theory in synchronous hybrid programs. Computers & Education, 114, 117–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K. C., & Jang, S. J. (2010). Motivation in online learning: Testing a model of self-determination theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 741–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colpaert, J. (2010). Elicitation of language learners’ personal goals as design concepts. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 4(3), 259–274.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE.

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durksen, T. L., Chu, M. W., Ahmad, Z. F., Radil, A. I., & Daniels, L. M. (2016). Motivation in a MOOC: A probabilistic analysis of online learners’ basic psychological needs. Social Psychology of Education, 19(2), 241–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds, W. A., & Kennedy, T. D. (2017). An applied guide to research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. SAGE.

  • Faye, C., & Sharpe, D. (2008). Academic motivation in university: The role of basic psychological needs and identity formation. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 40(4), 189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y. C., Backman, S. J., Backman, K. F., McGuire, F. A., & Moore, D. (2019). An investigation of motivation and experience in virtual learning environments: A self-determination theory. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 591–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, P., & Colpaert, J. (2019). Toward transdisciplinarity in computer-assisted language learning. CALICO Journal, 36(2), 81–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang, H., Reeve, J., Ryan, R. M., & Kim, A. (2009). Can self-determination theory explain what underlies the productive, satisfying learning experiences of collectivistically oriented Korean students? Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, R. M., Perry, N. E., & Frenzel, A. C. (2012). Teachers’ relatedness with students: An underemphasized component of teachers’ basic psychological needs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 150–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liaw, M. L., & English, K. (2017). Technologies for teaching and learning L2 reading. C. A., Chapelle, & S. Sauro (Eds.). The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp. 62–76). Wiley Blackwell.

  • Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmaxi, A., & Zaphiris, P. (2016). Computer-mediated communication in computer-assisted language learning: Implications for culture-centered design. Universal Access in the Information Society, 15(1), 169–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. SAGE.

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salikhova, N. R., Lynch, M. F., & Salikhova, A. B. (2020). Psychological aspects of digital learning: A self-determination theory perspective. Contemporary Educational Technology, 12(2), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sergis, S., Sampson, D. G., & Pelliccione, L. (2018). Investigating the impact of Flipped Classroom on students’ learning experiences: A Self-Determination Theory approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 368–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smorti, A. (2011). Autobiographical memory and autobiographical narrative: What is the relationship? Narrative Inquiry, 21(2), 303–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockwell, G. (2013). Mobile-assisted language learning. In M., Thomas, H., Reinders, & M. Warschauer (Eds.), Contemporary computer-assisted language learning (pp. 201–216). Bloomsbury.

  • Wang, C. J., Liu, W. C., Kee, Y. H., & Chian, L. K. (2019). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness in the classroom: Understanding students’ motivational processes using the self-determination theory. Heliyon, 5(7), e01983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01983

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Applied Linguistics, Department of English Language, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran

    Hussein Meihami & Fateme Husseini

Authors
  1. Hussein Meihami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fateme Husseini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hussein Meihami.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The Authors have no conflicts of interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meihami, H., Husseini, F. A self-determination theory into the psychological needs of CALL: Probing EFL teachers’ autobiographical narratives. Educ Inf Technol 27, 7781–7803 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10964-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10964-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation