Abstract
In order to investigate the overall cognition of blended learning, we made a questionnaire survey and interviews with students and teachers of 10 universities and colleges in Anhui Province. Based on this investigation, we design a Rain class blended learning model which fully utilizes the modern network technology and mobile terminals to closely link pre-class and after-class learning to classroom teaching by using Wechat terminal. In order to validate the application effect of the model, a quasi-experiment is conducted between two groups of students. We used SPSS 23.0 in recording and analyzing the data for inferential statistics, two independent samples T-test, variance analysis and descriptive statistical analysis. The difference was statistically significant with P < 0.05. The study found that students have higher interest and acceptance to blended learning, but miscellaneous online resources and excessive interference information have negative impacts on students’ online learning participation behavior. The hypothesis about the influencing factors of blended learning has been verified empirically, that is, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, a learning atmosphere are important factors affecting learners’ acceptance of blended learning. A teaching practice proved that the new learning model has achieved remarkable results in improving learning efficiency and quality of students in large classroom, cultivating students’ learning initiative and stimulating their interest in learning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
The datasets used or analysed during the current study are available from the author on reasonable request.
References
Al-Qatawneh, S., Eltahir, M. E., & Alsalhi, N. R. (2020). The effect of blended learning on the achievement of HDE students in the methods of teaching Arabic language course and their attitudes towards its use at Ajman University: A case study. Education and Information Technologies, 3(25), 2101–2127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10046-w
Asarta, C. J., & Schmidt, J. R. (2017). Comparing student performance in blended and traditional courses: Does prior academic achievement matter. The Internet & Higher Education, 32, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.08.002
Asarta, C. J., & Schmidt, J. R. (2020). The effects of online and blended experience on outcomes in a blended learning environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100708
Bazelais, P., & Doleck, T. (2018). Blended learning and traditional learning: A comparative study of college mechanics courses. Education and Information Technologies, 23, 2889–2900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9748-9
Baturay, M. H. (2015). An overview of the world of MOOCs. Proccedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.685
Bersin J. (2004).The blended learning book: Best practices, proven methodologies, and lesson learned. Pfeiffer John Wiley & Sons.
Bliuc, A. M., Goodyear, P., & Ellis, R. A. (2007). Research focus and methodological choices in studies into students’ experiences of blended learning in higher education. The Internet & Higher Education, 10(4), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.08.001
Bouilheres, F., Le, L. T. V. H., McDonald, S., et al. (2020). Defining student learning experience through blended learning. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 3049–3069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10100-y
Brahimi, T., & Sarirete, A. (2015). Learning outside the classroom through MOOCs. Computers in Human Behavior, 51(part B), 604–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.013
Broadbent, J. (2017). Comparing online and blended learner’s self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance. The Internet & Higher Education, 33, 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.004
Carbonell, K. B., Dailey-Hebert, A., & Gijselaers, W. (2013). Unleashing the creative potential of faculty to create blended learning. The Internet & Higher Education, 18, 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.10.004
Castro, R. (2019). Blended learning in higher education: Trends and capabilities. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 2523–2546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09886-3
Christensen C.M., Horn M.B., Staker H. (2013). Is K-12 blended learning disruptive? An introduction of the theory of hybrids. Clayton Christensen Institute for Disruptive Innovation, 1–48.
ClaudeMüller, ThoralfMildenberger. (2021). Facilitating flexible learning by replacing classroom time with an online learning environment: A systematic review of blended learning in higher education. Educational Research Review, 34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100394
Devlin K. (2013).The MOOC will soon die. Long live the MOOR. http://mooctalk.org/2013/06/03/the-mooc-will-soon-die-long-live-the-moor/
Driscoll & Barneveld. (2015). Applying learning theory to mobile learning. Td Talent Development, 69(1), 1–15.
Du, S., & Fu, Z. (2016). Blended learning and its empirical research based on MOOC. China Education Technology, 12, 129–133.
Felipede, B. L., Sintria, L., & Alex, S. G. (2021). Contrasting levels of student engagement in blended and non-blended learning scenarios. Computer & Education, 172, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104241.
Ertmer, P., Gedik, N. T., Richardson, J. C., et al. (2008). Perceived value of online discussions: perceptions of engineering and education students. Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, 4679–4687.
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet & Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
Ginns, P., & Ellis, R. (2007). Quality in blended learning: Exploring the relationships between on-line and face-to-face teaching and learning. The Internet & Higher Education, 10(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.10.003
Graham, C. R., Allen, S., & Ure, D. (2005). Benefits and challenges of blended learning environments. In Belanger, F.(Ed), Encyclopedia of information science and technology (pp. 253–259). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
Graham, C. R., Woodfield, W., & Harrison, J. B. (2013). A framework for institutional adoption and Implementation of blended learning in higher education. The Internet & Higher Education, 18, 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.003
Han, X., & Wang, Y. (2019). Towards a framework for an institution-wide quantitative assessment of teachers’ online participation in blended learning implementation. The Internet & Higher Education, 42, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.03.003
He, J. (2020). Construction of three-stage asynchronous instructional mode of blended flipped classroom based on Mobile learning platform. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 4915–4936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10200-9
Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12, 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.05.001
HsuVolkan, D., Isler, V., Latombe, J., & Lin, M. C. (2010). Algorithmic Foundations of Robotics IX. Springer-Verlag.
Hubackova, S. (2015). Blended learning—New stage in the foreign language teaching. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1957–1961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.582
Jiahou, Li. (2014). The localization of micro-lectures methodology and flipped classroom in China. The Chinese Journal of ICT in Education, 14, 7–9.
Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y., & Kim, E. K. (2011). Online university students’ satisfaction and persistence:examining perceived level of presence, usefulness and ease of use as predictors in a structural model. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1654–1664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.008
Keengwe, J., & Kang, J. J. (2013). A review of empirical research on blended learning in teacher education programs. Education and Information Technologies, 18, 479–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-011-9182-8
Liaw, S. S., Huang, H. M., & Chen, G. D. (2007). Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1066–1080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.001
Lafrance, J., & Blizzard, J. (2013). Student perceptions of digital story telling as a learning-tool for educational leaders. International Journal of Education Leadership Preparation, 8, 25–43.
Lim, D. H., & Morris, M. L. (2009). Learner and instuctional factors influencing learning outcomes within a blended learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 282–293.
Lima, F. B., Lautert, S. L., & Gomes, A. S. (2021). Contrasting levels of student engagement in blended and non-blended learning scenarios. Computers & Education, 172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104241
Matukhin, D., & Zhitkova, E. (2015). Implementing blended learning technology in higher professional education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 206, 183–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.051
Mayeh, M., Ramayah, T., & Popa, S. (2014). The role of absorptive capacity in the usage of a complex information system: The case of the enterprise information system. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 20(6), 826–841. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e318259520c
Monk, E. F., Guidry, K. R., Pusecker, K. L., et al. (2020). Blended learning in computing education: It’s here but does it work? Education and Information Technologies, 25, 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09920-4
Moskal, P., Dziuban, C., & Hartman, J. (2013). Blended learning: A dangerous idea? The Internet & Higher Education, 18, 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.001
Nazarenko, A. L. (2015). Blended learning vs traditional learning: What works? (A case study research). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 200, 77–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.018
Ouyanga, F., & Jiaob, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: The three paradigms. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100020
Okaz, A. A. (2015). Integrating blended learning in higher education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 600–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.086
Oliver, E. (2012). Closing gaps in open distance learning for theology students. Acta Theologica, 32(2), 162–183. https://doi.org/10.4314/actat.v32i2.10.
Paechter, M., Maier, B., & Macher, D. (2010). Students’ expectations of, and experiences in e-learning: Their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction . Computers & Education, 54(1), 222–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.005
Philippe, S., Lameras, P., Petridis, P., et al. (2020). Multimodal teaching, learning and training in virtual reality: A review and case study. Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware, 2(5), 421–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vrih.2020.07.008
Porter, W. W., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. A., et al. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Institutional adoption and implementation. Computers & Education, 75, 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.011
Powerll A., Watson J., et al.(2015). Blended learning: the evolution of online and face-to-face education from 2008-2015. Promising practices in blended and online learning series. International Association for K-12 online learning.
Roca, J. C., & Gagne, M. (2008). Understandings-learning continuance intention in the workplace : A self-determination theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1585–1604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.06.001
Revilla, E. (2006). Formal and informal facilitators of learning capability: the moderating effect of learning climate. Working Papers Economia, wp06–09. Instituto de Empresa, Area of Economic Environment.Sakai. The Sakai Project. http://www.sakaiproject.org
Selim, H. M. (2007). Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models. Computers & Education, 49(2), 396–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.09.004
Small, F., Dowell, D., & Simmons, P. (2012). Teacher communication preferred over peer interaction: student satisfaction with different tools in a virtual learning environment. Journal of International Education in Business, 5(2), 114–128. https://doi.org/10.1108/18363261211281735
Taylor, J. A., & Newton, D. (2013). Beyond blended learning: A case study of institutional change at an Australian regional university. The Internet & Higher Education, 18, 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.10.003
Uğur, B., Akkoyunlu, B., & Kurbanoğlu, S. (2011). Students’ opinions on blended learning and its implementation in terms of their learning styles. Education and Information Technologies, 16, 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-009-9109-9
Ustun, A. B., Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G., & Yilmaz, R. (2021). Investigating the role of accepting learning management system on students’ engagement and sense of community in blended learning. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 4751–4769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10500-8
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Wu, J., & Liu, W. (2013). An empirical investigation of the critical factors affecting students’ satisfaction in EFL blended learning. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 4(1), 176–185. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.4.1.176-185
Acknowledgements
The author thanks in particular the teachers and students, Fuyang Normal University, who participated in the study.
Funding
This work was supported by the grants (gxyqZD2017090, SK2020A0989, 2018FXJT01, 2020jyxm1404) from the Foundations of the Department of Education in Anhui province to Fuyang Normal University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest/competing interests
The authors do not have any possible conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, W. An empirical study on blended learning in higher education in “internet + ” era. Educ Inf Technol 27, 8705–8722 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10944-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10944-6