Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Insights into Finnish first-year pre-service teachers’ twenty-first century skills

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study focuses on Finnish pre-service teachers’ perceptions of their twenty-first century skills, especially their learning strategies, collaboration and teamwork, as well as knowledge and attitudes related to ICT in education. The target group consist of 263 first-year pre-service teachers from three universities. The results outline how pre-service teachers perceive their twenty-first century skills, the relationships between different areas of these skills, and the differences among pre-service teachers in terms of perceived skills. The results indicate that the pre-service teachers perceive themselves as skilled learners in terms of learning strategies used as well as collaboration and teamwork. When it comes to understanding how to use ICT in education, they perceived their level of knowledge lower. The strongest variation between respondents was seen in the areas of knowledge and attitudes related to the use of ICT in education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aijzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

  • Ananiadou, K., & Claro, M. (2009). Twenty-first century skills and competences for new millennium learners in OECD countries. OECD Education Working Papers. No. 41. Paris: OECD.

  • Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and Teaching of twenty-first Century Skills (pp. 17–66). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dignath, C., & Büttner, G. (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students. A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognition and Learning, 3(3), 231–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dignath, C., Büttner, G. & Langfeldt, H. P. (2008). How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively? A meta-analysis on self-regulation training programmes. Educational Research Review, 3(2): 101–129.

  • Ericsson, K. A. (2009). Development of professional expertise: Toward measurement of expert performance and design of optimal learning environments. Cambridge University Press.

  • Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, C. J., Kirby, J. R., & Fabrigar, L. R. (2003). Approaches to learning, need for cognition, and strategic flexibility among university students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 507–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finnish National Board of Education (2015). Luokanopettajakoulutus, kaikki yliopistot [Teacher training, all universities]. URL 26.10.2015 http://vipunen.fi/fi-fi/_layouts/15/xlviewer.aspx?id=/fi-fi/Raportit/Haku-%20ja%20valintatiedot%20-%20korkeakoulu%20-%20yo%20-%20analyysi.xlsb

  • Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., & Gebhardt, E. (2014). Preparing for life in a digital age. The IEA International Computer and Information Literacy Study International Report. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glogger, I., Schwonke, R., Holzäpfel, L., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2012). Learning strategies assessed by journal writing: prediction of learning outcomes by quantity, quality, and combinations of learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 452–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, J., Halasz, G., Krawczyk, M., Leney, T., Michel, A., Pepper, D., & Wiśniewski, J. (2009). Key competences in Europe. Opening doors for lifelong learning. No. 87. Warsaw: CASE - Center for Social and Economic Research.

  • Griffin, P., Care, E., & McGaw, B. (2012). The changing role of education and schools. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of twenty-first century skills (pp. 17–66). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hadwin, A. F., Nesbit, J., Jamieson-Noel, D., Code, J., & Winne, P. (2007). Examining trace data to explore self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 2, 107–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R. L., & Jones, S. K. (2011). Developing and assessing college student teamwork skills. New Directions for Institutional Research, 149, 53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lei, J. (2009). Digital natives as preservice teachers: What technology preparation is needed? Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25(3), 87–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughry, M. L., Ohland, M. L., & Woehr, D. J. (2014). Assessing teamwork skills for assurance of learning using CATME Team Tools. Journal of Marketing Education, 36(1), 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, A. M., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2013). Introduction: What is collaborative learning? An overview. The international handbook of collaborative learning, 1–15.

  • OECD (2013). Draft PISA 2015 collaborative problem solving framework. Retrieved 14th of January 2014 from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/Draft%20PISA%202015%20Collaborative%20Problem%20Solving%20Framework%20.pdf

  • P21Skills. (2013) Framework for 21st Century Learning. Retrieved 11th of January 2016 from: http://www.p21.org/our-work/p21-framework.

  • Perry, N. E. (1998). Young children’s self-regulated learning and contexts that support it. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 715–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekarts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 452–494). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching and assessing. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 219–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated for Learning Strategies Questionnaire (MSLQ). Education and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, B. E., Prevatt, F. F., Adams, K., Hurst, A., & Petscher, Y. (2006). Study skills profiles of normal-achieving and academically-struggling college students. Journal of College Student Development, 47(1), 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotherham, A. J., & Willingham, D. (2009). Twenty-first century skills: The challenges head. Educational Leadership, 67(1), 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlberg, P. (2011). The Fourth Way of Finland. Journal of Educational Change, 12(2), 173–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., Bransford, J., Kozma, B., & Quellmalz, E. (2012). New assessments and environments for knowledge building. In Assessment and teaching of twenty-first century skills (pp. 231–300). Springer Netherlands.

  • Silva, E. (2009). Measuring skills for 21st-century learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(9), 630–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, M. L., Olejnik, S., Tam, A. Y., & Supattathum, S. (1994). Elaborative verbal rehearsals and college students’ cognitive performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 267–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tait, H., & Entwistle, N. J. (1996). Identifying students at risk through ineffective study strategies. Higher Education, 31, 97–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T., & Tan, L. (2012). The theory of planned behavior (TPB) and pre-service teachers’ technology acceptance: a validation study using structural equation modeling. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 20(1), 89–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valtonen, T., Havu-Nuutinen, S., Dillon, P., Kontkanen, S., Vesisenaho, M., & Pöntinen, S. (2013). Challenges with social software for collaboration: Two case studies from teacher training. In Seminar. net-International journal of media, technology and lifelong learning, 9(1), 18–31).

  • Valtonen, T., Kukkonen, J., Kontkanen, S., Sormunen, K., Dillon, P., & Sointu, E. (2015a). The impact of authentic learning experiences with ICT on pre-service teachers’ intentions to use ICT for teaching and learning. Computers & Education, 81, 49–58.

  • Valtonen, T., Sointu, E., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., & Kukkonen, J. (2015b). Developing a TPACK measurement instrument for 21st century preservice teachers. Seminar. net–International Journal of Media, Technology & Life-long Learning, 11(2), 87–100.

  • Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for twenty-first century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44, 299–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voogt, J., Erstad, O., Dede, C., & Mishra, P. (2013). Challenges to learning and schooling in the digital networked world of the twenty-first century. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29, 403–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., MacCann, C., Zhuang, X., Lydia, L. O., & Roberts, D. R. (2009). Assessing teamwork and collaboration in high school students: A multimethod approach. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 24(2), 108–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 33(1), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, C. E., Husman, J., & Dierking, D. R. (2000). Self-regulation interventions with a focus on learning strategies. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 727–747). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, C. E., Acee, T. W., & Jung, J. (2011). Self-regulation and learning strategies. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2011(126), 45–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H., & Jamieson-Noel, D. (2002). Exploring students’ calibration of self-reports about study tactics and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(4), 551–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531–566). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (pp. 1–38). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Self-regulated learning and performance. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 1–12). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teemu Valtonen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Valtonen, T., Sointu, E.T., Kukkonen, J. et al. Insights into Finnish first-year pre-service teachers’ twenty-first century skills. Educ Inf Technol 22, 2055–2069 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9529-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9529-2

Keywords

Navigation