Abstract
Driven by Information Technologies (IT), universities are making in depth changes to the nature and form of learning processes, which are intended to better prepare students for entry into the labour market. In this paper, we focus on the evolution of students’ use of IT in an institution characterized by organizational changes, and we analyse the determinants of students’ e-skills using a sample set of French university students. We show that students’ involvement in the use of IT increases their e-skills. IT learning by doing and IT learning by using also increase some categories of students’ e-skills. In addition, collaborative and cooperative learning are positively associated with students’ advanced e-skills.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
With respect to the debate about the productivity paradox (Triplett 1999), performance associated with IT usage depends strongly on the adoption of New Organizational Practices (NOP) (Greenan and Mairesse 2004; Greenan and Walkowiak 2006). During the last decade, many firms have experienced a reorganization of their workplace. New work practices have been adopted such as job rotation, delayering, self-directed work-team, just-in-time and total quality management (Askenazy et al. 2002; Caroli and Van Reenen 2001; Işık, and Yılmaz 2011) find a positive impact of new work practices on productivity especially in connection with information technologies’. Askenazy and Gianella (2000), Black and Lynch (2001) and Bresnahan et al. (2002) underline the importance of introducing clusters of complementary practices. New work practices are biased against unskilled labour leading to an upskilling of firms’ occupational structure. According to Arvanitis and Loukis (2009), IT, new organizational practices and human capital can contribute to firm efficiency and performance.
European Commission 2011.
Initially the evaluation was based upon publication. Higher Education Teachers were not “incited” to invest in pedagogy. Most of them have not followed any pedagogical training (Ben Youssef and Hadhri 2009).
Please note that we also tested our adoption equation through ordered logit and ordered probit models. The results achieved were very similar, which confirms the robustness of the equation. Nevertheless, the multinomial logit model was preferred insofar as it is difficult to interpret the ESKILLS_3 and ESKILLS_4 classes as ordered in terms of categories of e-skills.
References
Arvanitis, S., & Loukis, E. N. (2009). Information and communication technologies, human capital, workplace organization and labour productivity: a comparative study based on firm-level data for Greece and Switzerland. Information Economics and Policy, 21(1), 43–61.
Askenazy, P., & Gianella, C. (2000). Le paradoxe de productivité : les changements organisationnels, facteur complémentaire à l’informatisation. Economie et Statistique, 339(1), 219–241.
Askenazy, P., Caroli, E., & Marcus, V. (2002). New organizational practices and working conditions: evidence from France in the 1990’s. Recherches Économiques de Louvain/Louvain Economic Review, 68(1–2), 91–110.
Barak, M., Lipson, A., & Lerman, S. (2006). Wireless laptops as means for promoting active learning in large lecture halls. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(3), 245–263.
Ben Youssef, A., & Dahmani, M. (2008). The impact of ICT’s on students’ performance in Higher Education: direct effects, indirect effects and organizational change. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento, 5(1), 45–56.
Ben Youssef, A., & Hadhri, W. (2009). Les dynamiques d’usage des technologies de l’information et de la communication par les enseignants universitaires : le cas de la France. Réseaux, 27(155/2009), 25–54.
Ben Youssef, A., Ben Youssef, H., & Dahmani, M. (2013). Higher education teachers e-skills and the innovation process. International Journal of Computer and Information Technology, 2(2), 185–195.
Black, S. E., & Lynch, L. M. (2001). How to compete: the impact of workplace practices and information technology on productivity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(3), 434–445.
Blass, E. (2005). The rise and rise of the corporate university. Journal of European Industrial Training, 29(1), 58–74.
Bresnahan, T. F., Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (2002). Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: firm-level evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 339–376.
Caroli, E. (2001). Organizational change, new technologies and the skill bias: What do we know? In Petit P. & Soete L. (Eds.), Technology and the future of european employment (pp. 259–292). Edward Elgar.
Caroli, E., & Van Reenen, J. (2001). Skill-biased organizational change? Evidence from a panel of British and French establishments. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(4), 1449–1492.
Czerniewicz, L., & Brown, B. (2009). A study of the relationship between institutional policy, organisational culture and e-learning use in four South African universities. Computers in Education, 53(1), 121131.
Ebner, M., Lienhardt, C., Rohs, M., & Meyer, I. (2010). Microblogs in higher education—a chance to facilitate informal and process-oriented learning? Computers in Education, 55(1), 92–100.
Fernandez, J. A. (2007). The future of corporate universities in Europe. Global Focus, 2(2), 40–43.
Franses, P. H., & Paap, R. (2001). Quantitative models in marketing research (1st ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Greenan, N., Mairesse, J. (2004). A firm level investigation of the complementarity between information and communication technologies and new organizational practices. In 79th Annual conference of the Western Economic Association International. June 29–July 3, 2004. Vancouver, Canada.
Greenan, N., & Walkowiak, E. (2006). Information technology, work organization and social interactions. Economie et Statistique, 387, 35–63.
Hakkarainen, K., Ilomaki, L., Lipponen, L., Muukkonen, H., & Rahikainen, M. (2000). Students’ skills and practices of using ICT: results of a national assessment in Finland. Computers in Education, 34(2), 103–117.
Hrastinski, S., & Naghmeh, M. (2012). How are campus students using social media to support their studies? An explorative interview study. Education and Information Technologies, 17(4), 451–464.
Işık, C., & Yılmaz, S. (2011). E-learning in life long education: a computational approach to determining listening comprehension ability. Education and Information Technologies, 16(1), 71–88.
Jonassen, D., Lee, C. B., Yang, C.-C., Laffey, J. (2005). The collaboration principle in multimedia learning. In The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 247–270). Richard Mayer.
Keengwe, J., Onchwari, G., & Onchwari, J. (2009). Technology and student learning: toward a learner-centered teaching model. AACE Journal, 17(1), 11–22.
Kezar, A. J. (2001). Understanding and facilitating organizational change in the 21st century: Recent research and conceptualizations, vol. 28 of J-B ASHE-ERIC Report Series (AEHE) Series (1st ed.). Washington: Jossey-Bass.
Knight, P., & Yorke, M. (2004). Learning, curriculum and employability in higher education. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Maddala, G. S. (1993). Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nicol, D. J., & MacLeod, I. A. (2005). Using a shared workspace and wireless laptops to improve collaborative project learning in an engineering design class. Computers in Education, 44(4), 459–475.
Pavitt, K. (1985). Patent statistics as indicators of innovative activities: possibilities and problems. Scientometrics, 7(1,2), 77–99.
SEUSISS Project Final Report (2003). Survey of European universities skills in ICT of students and staff. Tech. rep.
Saulnier, B. M., Landry, J. P., Longenecker, H. E., & Wagner, T. A. (2008). From teaching to learning: learner-centered teaching and assessment in information systems education. Journal of Information Systems, 19(2), 169–175.
Sivapalan, S., & Cregan, P. (2005). Value of online resources for learning by distance education. CAL-Laborate, 14, 23–27.
Steyaert, J. (2002). Inequality and the digital divide: Myths and realities. In S. H. J. McNutt (Ed.), Advocacy, activism and the internet (pp. 199–211). Chicago: Lyceum Press.
Thijs, A., Almekinders, R., Blijleven, P., Pelgrum, W., & Voogt, J. (2001). Learning through the web: A literature study on the potential uses of the web for student learning. Tech. rep. Enschede: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Curriculum.
Triplett, J. E. (1999). The Solow productivity paradox: what do computers do to productivity? Canadian Journal of Economics, 32(2), 309–334.
van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. (2010). Measuring internet skills. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 26(10), 891–916.
van Dijk, J. A. (2005). The deepening divide inequality in the information society. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Zammit, L. (2004). Literacy in ICT skills. Tech. rep. The Lisbon Objectives and the Maltese Education Provision.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ben Youssef, A., Dahmani, M. & Omrani, N. Information technologies, students’ e-skills and diversity of learning process. Educ Inf Technol 20, 141–159 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-013-9272-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-013-9272-x