Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Promoting communication skills for information systems students in Australian and Portuguese higher education: Action research study

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper aims to examine the value of communication skills learning process through various assessments in Information Systems (IS) postgraduate units in Australia and Portugal. Currently, communication skills are indispensable to students in expanding their social networks and their knowledge at university and in the future workplace, since businesses expect their employees to have strong communication and presentation skills. This paper provides empirical evidence based on the anonymous quantitative and qualitative data collected during 2 years from 126 postgraduate students, which were collected via formal and informal feedback. Various assessment methods were used in Information Systems units to promote and develop the communication skills; these assessments are: reflective journal, business plan and prototype, discussion forum, presentation, and final examination. A Communication skills model (CSM) was developed based on Action research principles to promote the assessments which will assist IS students to enhance their communication skills. The research outcomes indicated that integrating communication skills in the assessments will allow students to promote their communication skills and boost their self-esteem skills. Furthermore, this paper added a new theoretical and practical contribution to higher-education teaching and learning literature, especially the action research for teachers to promote and develop communication skills among students. Finally, integrating these skills in the units should meet the objectives and aims of the units, Master’s degrees, universities, and businesses’ needs, and satisfy our student’s needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albitz, R. (2007). The what and who of information literacy and critical thinking in higher education. Libraries and the Academy, 7(1), 97–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avison, D., Lau, F., Myers, M., & Nielsen, P. A. (1999). Action research—to make academic research relevant, researchers should try out their theories with practitioners in real situations and real organizations. Communications of the ACM, 42(1), 94–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G., & Stams, G. (2001). Critical thinking and the question of critique: some lessons from deconstruction. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 20, 57–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M., VanLehn, K., Litman, D., & Jordan, P. (2011). Empirically evaluating the application of reinforcement learning to the induction of effective and adaptive pedagogical strategies. User Model User-Adap Inter, 21, 137–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, M. (2003). Reflection: Journals and reflective questions a strategy for professional learning. Paper presented at the NZARE/AARE Conference Auckland, New Zealand

  • Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). USA: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtin University (2010). Teaching and learning in Curtin. Perth-WA.

  • Curtin University (n.d.). Graduate Attributes and Professional Skills Program http://www.business.curtin.edu.au/business/current-students/unit-and-course-information/graduate-attributes-and-professional-skills-program. Accessed 14 May 2012.

  • Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: D. C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diggins, M. (2004). Teaching and learning communication skills in social work education. Social Care Institute for Excellence.

  • Drury, H., & Taylor, C. (1999). Providing the discipline context for skills development: report on the production of an interactive video for oral and visual communication in the biological sciences In HERDSA Annual International Conference Melbourne 1999 (pp. 1–9).

  • Elliot, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, T. (2006). Mixed methods and mixed methodologies—the practical, the technical and the political. Journal of Research in Nursing, 11(3), 205–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains. American Psychologist, 53(4), 449–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R., & Reilly, T. (2011). Mixed methods designs in marketing research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 14(1), 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattangdi, A., & Ghosh, A. (2008). Enhancing the quality and accessibility of higher education through the use of Information and Communication Technologies. In International Conference on Emergent Missions, Resources, and the Geographic Locus in Strategy as a part of the 11th Annual Convention of the Strategic Management Forum (SMF), India 2008 (Vol. 2011, pp. 1–14, Vol. 28 March).

  • Hesse-Biber, S. (2010). Emerging methodologies and methods practices in the field of mixed methods research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 415–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbs, D., & Brand, C. (2010). Learning from the inside out: a method for analyzing reflective journals in the college classroom. Journal of Experiential Education, 33(1), 56–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubner, S., Nuckles, M., & Renkl, A. (2010). Writing learning journals: instructional support to overcome learning-strategy deficits. Learning and Instruction, 20, 18–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karkukly, W. (2011). An investigation into outsourcing of PMO functions for improved organizational performance: A quantitative and qualitative study. USA: Trafford Publishing.

  • Koh, L. C. (2008). Refocusing formative feedback to enhance learning in pre-registration nurse education. Nurse Education in Practice, 8(4), 223–230. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2007.08.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuzma, J. (2011). Using online technology to enhance student presentation skills. Worcester Journal of Learning and Teaching (Vol. 5). Worcester, UK: University of Worcester

  • Lanning, S. K., Brickhouse, T. H., Gunsolley, J. C., Ranson, S. L., & Willett, R. M. (2011). Communication skills instruction: an analysis of self, peer-group, student instructors and faculty assessment. Patient Education and Counseling, 83, 145–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, V. (2010). eSelf-assessment: A case study in English language learning (Hong Kong) for enhancing Writing and Oral Presentation Skills. Paper presented at the International Conference on Education Technology and Computer (ICETC) Shanghai.

  • Maudsley, G. (2011). Mixing it but not mixed-up: mixed methods research in medical education (a critical narrative review). Medical Teacher, 33(2), 92–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, H., & O’Toole, T. (2012). Critical issues in research design in action research in an SME development content. European Journal of Training and Development, 36(5), 508–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2005). All you need to know about action research. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertler, C. (2006). Action research: Teachers and researchers in the classroom. USA: Sage Publications, Inc.

  • Mills, G. E. (2000). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, G. E. (2007). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.

  • Moody, J. (2002). Teaching effective listening skills to information systems majors. In Information Science—InSITE—“Where Parallels Intersect”, Cork, Ireland (pp. 1113–1116).

  • Pavolvich, K., Collins, E., & Jones, G. (2009). Developing students’ skills in reflective practice: design and assessment. Journal of Management Education, 23(1), 37–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peat, M., & Franklin, S. (2002). Supporting student learning: the use of computer-based formative assessment modules. Bristish Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), 515–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2001). Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagor, R. (2011). The action research guidebook. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press Inc.

  • Scott, I. (2011). The learning outcome in higher education: time to think again? Worcester Journal of Learning and Teaching, 5, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, O. (2011). An end to gender display through the performance of housework? A review and reassessment of the quantitative literature using insights from the qualitative literature. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 3, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanian, S., & Ryan, M. (1998). An approach to teaching professional communication skills to marketing students: A discussion and review. In ANZMAC, New Zealand (pp. 2591–2602).

  • Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research—integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. USA: SAGE Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, M., McCarthy, A., Hoxmeier, J., & Lenk, M. (1998). Community service learning increases communication skills across the business curriculum. Business Communication Quarterly, 61(2), 89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & Peters, O. (2011). Rethinking Internet skills: the contribution of gender, age, education, Internet experience, and hours online to medium- and content-related Internet skills. Poetics, 39(2), 125–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, T., Stariha, W., & Walberg, H. (2004). Teaching, speaking, listening and writing. Indiana University International Academy of Education.

  • Westerman, M. (2011). Conversation analysis and interpretive quantitative research on psychotherapy process and problematic interpersonal behavior. Theory & Psychology, 21(2), 155–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerman, M., & Yanchar, S. (2011). Changing the terms of the debate: quantitative methods in explicitly interpretive research. Theory & Psychology, 21(2), 139–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wingate, U. (2010). The impact of formative feedback on the development of academic writing. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 519–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winstone, N., & Millward, L. (2012). Reframing perceptions of the lecture from challenges to opportunities Paper presented at the The Higher Education Academy—STEM, London—England.

  • Woei, L., & White, G. (2010). The promotion of critical thinking through the use of an online discussion board: Asking the right questions? In Global Learn Asia Pacific (pp. 4277–4283).

  • Wolcott, S., Baril, C., Cunningham, B., Fordham, D., & Pierre, K. (2002). Critical thought on critical thinking research. Journal of Accounting Education, 20, 85–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worley, P. (2008). Writing skills essential in Tech Ed today. Tech Directions, 68(2), 17–19.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y., Newby, T., & Bill, R. (2008). Facilitating interactions through structured web-based bulletin boards: a quasi-experimental study on promoting learners’ critical thinking skills. Computers and Education, 50, 1572–1585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pedro Isaias.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Isaias, P., Issa, T. Promoting communication skills for information systems students in Australian and Portuguese higher education: Action research study. Educ Inf Technol 19, 841–861 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-013-9257-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-013-9257-9

Keywords

Navigation