Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Tapping the educational potential of Facebook: Guidelines for use in higher education

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Facebook is a frequently used Computer Mediated Environment (CME) for students and others to build social connections, with identities and deposited self-expression. Its widespread use makes it appropriate for consideration as an educational tool; though one that does not yet have clear guidelines for use. Whether a social networking site can be used for educational objectives remains largely unexplored as a research question. This paper discusses a study conducted at the University of Auckland and at Manchester Metropolitan University on how their students use Facebook, and its impact on their social and academic lives. Using theories of social capital and knowledge management, we explore some potential educational uses of Facebook. Guidelines are included for the educational use of Facebook by tutors in a university environment. These include both positive recommendations and activities and approaches to avoid; and include educational, administrative and legal issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Åkerlind, G.S. (2004). A new dimension to understanding university teaching, Teaching in Higher Education Vol. 9, Iss. 3.

  • Alavi, M. and Dufner, D. (2005). Technology-mediated collaborative learning: A research perspectitive. Learning together Online, Research on Asychronous Learning Networks. S. R. Hiltz and R. Goldman. London, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey.

  • Arrington, M. (2005). “85 % of college students use FaceBook.” Retrieved 1, September, 2008, from http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/09/07/85-of-college-students-use-facebook/.

  • Arthur C. (2011) Guardian.co.uk, http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/jun/13/Facebook-growth-slows-for-second-month

  • Beatty, K., & Nunan, D. (2004). Computer-mediated collaborative learning. System, 32(2), 165–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bieber, M., Engelbart, D., et al. (2002). Toward virtual community knowledge evolution. Journal of Management Information Systems Spring, 18(4), 11–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, A. L., & Horan, T. (1998). Virtual communities and social capital. Social Science Computer Review, 16, 293–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, s. P., & Cross, R. (2003). A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Science, 49(4), 432–445.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Form of capital. Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. J. G. Richardson. New York, Greenwood Press.

  • Bowen, W.G. and Bok, D. (1998). The Shape of the River: Long-Term Consequences of Considering Race in College and University Admissions, Princeton University Press.

  • Boyd, D. and Ellison, N. (2007a). “Social network sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship.” Journal of Computer-mediated Communication 13(1): article 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnigo, L., & Barnett-Ellis, P. (2007). Checking out Facebook.com: The impact of a digital trend on academic libraries. Information Technology and Libraries, 26, 210–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P., & Holwell, S. (1998). Information, Systems and Information systems - Making Sense of the field. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, C. M., Hsu, M. H., et al. (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision support system, 42, 1872–1888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, H., & Lee, J.-S. (2008). Collaborative Information Seeking in Intercultural Computer-Mediated Communication Groups: Testing the influence of social context using social network analysis. Communication Research, 35(4), 548–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, H., Lee, J.-S., et al. (2005). Development of computer-supported collaborative social networks in a distributed learning community. Behaviour & Information Technology, 24(6), 435–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(supplement), 95–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, A. (2005). What are communities of practice? A comparative review of four seminal works. Journal of Information Science, 31(6), 527–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, S., Heeks, R, Huysman M. (2003). “Knowledge and Learning in online networks in development: A social capital perspective.” Institute For Development Policy and Management 1–24.

  • Deakin, P. H., & Deakin, R. N. (2010). How important is study mode in student university choice? Higher Education Quarterly, 0951–5224, 161–182. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2273.2009.00435.x 64(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Donath, J., & Boyd, D. (2004). Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal, 22(4), 71–82. doi:10.1023/B:BTTJ.0000047585.06264.cc.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. I. M. (1993). Coevolution of neocortical size, group size and language in humans. Bahavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 681–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, C., Hiltz, S.R., Widmeyer, G. (2008). Understanding Development and usage of social networking sites: The social software performance model. Proceedings of the 41st Hawaii International Conference on System Science.

  • Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The Benefits of Facebook “Friends:” Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143–1168. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Facebook-Press-Room. (2008a). “Fact Sheet.” Retrieved 20, Oct, 2008, from http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?factsheet.

  • Facebook-Press-Room. (2008b). “Statistics.” Retrieved 17th March 2008, from www.facebook.com/press/info.php?statistics.

  • Ginger, J. (2007). The Facebook project, performance and construction of digital identity. Department of Sociology. URBANA-CHAMPAIGN, UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS Master in Sociology.

  • Gladwell, M. (2000). Designs for working, The New Yorker, Dec 11, 2000

  • Golder, S., Wikinson, D.M., and Huberman, B.A. (2006). Rhythms of social interaction: Messaging within a massive online network. 3rd International Conference on Communities and Technologies (CT2007). East Lansing, MI.

  • Goldstein, J. R., & Warren, J. R. (2000). Socioeconomic reach and Heterogeneity in the extended family: Contours and Consequences. Social Science Research, 29(3), 283–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1983). The Strength of weak ties: a network theory revisited. Social Theory, 1, 201–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haythornthwaite, C. and Nielsen, A.L. (2007). Revisiting computer-mediated communication for work, community, and learning psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and transpersonal implications J. Gackenbach. Alberta, Canada, Elsevier/Academic Press.

  • Haythornthwaite, C., & Wellman, B. (1998). Work, friendship, and media use for information exchange in a networked organization. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(12), 1101–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, A. and Forte, A. (2006). Crossing boundaries: Identity management and student/faculty relationships on the Facebook. A paper presented at Computer Supported Cooperative work 2006, November 4–8, Banff, Alberta, Canada.

  • Hoadley, C. M., & Kilner, P. G. (2005). Using technology to transform communities of practice into knowledge-building communities. ACM SIGGROUP Bulletin, 25(1), 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huysman, M.H. (2004). Design requirements for knowledge sharing tools: A need for social capital analysis. Social capital and Information Technology. M. H. Huysman, & Wulf, V., MIT Press, Cambridge.

  • Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Broeken, M., & Kanselaar, G. (2007). Visualization of agreement and discussion processes during computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1105–1125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kanselaar, G., & Jaspers, J. (2007). Visualization of participation: Does it contribute to successful computer-supported collaborative learning? Computers in Education, 49(4), 1037–1065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P., Jochems, A.W., van Buuren Hans (2007) Measuring perceived sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments, Computers & Education, Volume 49, Issue 2, September 2007, Pages 176–192, ISSN 0360–1315, 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.05.004. (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131505000904)

  • Lampe, C., Ellison, N., and Steinfield, C. (2006). “A Facebook in the crowd, Social Searching vs. social browsing. Proceedings of the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative work.” New York: ACM Press: 167–170.

  • Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge University Press.

  • Mack, D., Behler, A., Roberts, B., and Rimland, E. (2007). “Reaching students with Facebook: data and best practices”, Electronic Journal of Academic and Special Librarianship, v.8 no.2 (Summer 2007) http://southernlibrarianship.icaap.org/content/v08n02/mack_d01.html

  • Mayer, A., & Puller, S. L. (2008). The old boy (and girl) network: Social network formation on university campuses. Journal of Public Economics, 92(1–2), 329–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, M., & Munns, G. (2002). Student engagement and the social relations of pedagogy. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(3), 357–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munoz, C. L. and T. L. Towner (2009). Opening Facebook: How to use Facebook in the college classroom. 2009 Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education Conference. Charleston, South Carolina.

  • Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital and the organization advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie, N. H. (2001). Sociability, interpersonal relations, and the Internet: Reconciling conflicting findings. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 426–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. (2003). Engaging Students in the Learning Process: The learning journal, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, Vol. 27, Iss. 2, 2003

  • Pheiffer, G., Holley, D., & Andrew, D. (2005). Developing thoughtful students: using learning styles in an HE context. Education + Training, 47(6), 422–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polyani, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension, London Routledge & Keegan Paul.

  • Pool, M.S. and DeSanctis, G. (1990). Understanding the use of group decision support systems: The theory of adaptive structuration, Organisations and Communication Technology, pp 173–193

  • Putnam, R.D. (1995). Bowling alone: America's declining social capital New York, Simon & Schuster.

  • Schuller, T., Barson, S., Field, J., (2000). Social Capital: A review and critique. Social Capital: critical perspective. J. F. Stephen Baron, Tom Schuller. USA, Oxford University Press.

  • Selwyn, N. (2007). “Screw blackboard … do it on Facebook!”: An investigation of students’ educational use of Facebook. Presented at the “Poke 1.0 - Facebook Social Research Symposium”, University of London.

  • Skeels, M.M. and Grudin, J (2009). When social networks cross boundaries: A case study of workplace use of Facebook and LindedIn. ACM 2009 International conference on Supporting group work Florida, U.S.A, ACM.

  • Stone, N. J., & Posey, M. (2008). Understanding coordination in computer-mediated versus Face-to-Face groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 827–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tong, S. T., Heide, B. V. D., & Langwell, L. (2008). Too much of a good Thing? The relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impressions on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 531–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urquhart, C., Liyanage, S., & Muhammadou, M. O. K. (2008). ICTs and poverty reduction: A Social capital and knowledge perspective. Journal of Information Technology, 23, 203–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filters. In M. L. Knapp & A. Daly (Eds.), Computer-mediated communication and relationships. Handbook of Interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 529–563). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walther, J. B., Van Der Heide, B., Kim, S., Westerman, D., & Tong, S. T. (2008). The role of friends’ behavior on evaluations of individuals’ Facebook profiles: Are we known by the company we keep? Human Communication Research, 34, 28–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, R. (2008). Reading paper in Facebook. INFOSYS 732 Research paper. Auckland, The University of Auckland.

  • Wang, R., Urquhart, C., Scown, P., and Hardman, J. (2010) .“Tapping the Educational Potential of Facebook: Leveraging Social Capital and Knowledge”. AMCIS 2010 Proceedings. Paper 308. http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2010/308

  • Weinberger, A., Reiserer, M., Ertl, B., Fischer, F. and Mandl, H. (2006). Facilitating collaborative knowledge construction in computer-mediated learning environments with cooperation scripts. Barriers and biases in computer-mediated knowledge communication: And how they may be overcome. R. Bromme, R.W. Hesse and H. Spada. U.S. A, Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. .

  • Wellman, B., Haase, A. Q., Witt, J., & Hampton, K. (2001). Does the internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 436–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, S. (2006a). Cyber-gathering places and online-embedded relationships. The Annual Meetings of the eastern sociological society in Boston.

  • Zhao, S. (2006b). “Do Internet users have more social ties? A call for differentiated analyses of Internet use.” Journal of Computer-mediated Communication 11(3): article 8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Adfaith Management Consulting Inc., Beijing, China

    Rex Wang

  2. The Business School, Manchester Metropolitan University, All Saints Campus, Oxford Road, Manchester, M15 6BH, UK

    Phil Scown, Cathy Urquhart & Julie Hardman

Authors
  1. Rex Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Phil Scown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cathy Urquhart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Julie Hardman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Phil Scown.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, R., Scown, P., Urquhart, C. et al. Tapping the educational potential of Facebook: Guidelines for use in higher education. Educ Inf Technol 19, 21–39 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-012-9206-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-012-9206-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation