Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The eventful genesis of educational media

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is a reflection on the history and future of educational media. Over the last century various new media technologies were introduced in education. Most of these failed to meet the high expectations. The paper reviews the rise and fall of various “revolutionary” learning media and analyses what went wrong. Three main driving factors are identified that influence the educational system: 1) educational practice, 2) educational research, and 3) educational technologies. The role and position of these factors is elaborated and critically reviewed. The paper concludes with identifying a number of relevant developments that substantiate a favourable future outlook of media for learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almenda, M. B. (1988). Speaking personally with Gayle Childs. American Journal of Distance Education., 2(2), 68–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, N. (1995). Edison: Inventing the century. New York: Hyperion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, A. (1995). Technology, open learning and distance education. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, L. T. (1988). A history of teaching machines. American Psychologist, 43(9), 703–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitzer, D., Lichtenberger, W., & Braunfeld, P. G. (1961). PLATO: an automatic teaching device. IRE Transactions on Education. E-4, 157–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkhardt, H., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (2003). Improving educational research: toward a more useful, more influential, and better-funded enterprise. Educational Researcher, 32(9), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casimir, H. B. G. (1987). Natuurwetenschap, techniek en maatschappij. In H. B. G. Casimir (Ed.), Waarneming en Visie. Over Wetenschap en Maatschappij (pp. 40–48). Amsterdam: Meulenhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • CBS. (2009). De digitale economie 2009. Heerlen/Den Haag: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek.

    Google Scholar 

  • CERI. (2000). Knowledge management in the learning society. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarck, R. E., & Estes, F. (1998). Technology or craft: what are we doing? Educational Technology, 38(5), 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarck, R. E. (2001). Learning from Media. Arguments, analysis and evidence. Information Age Publishing, Greenwich.

  • Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused, computers in the classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and Machines. The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darrow, B. (1932). Radio: the assistant teacher. Columbus: R.G. Adams.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bie, D. (2002). Het beperkte nut van onderwijsonderzoek. HBO-Journaal, oktober, 40–41.

  • De Vries, G. (1985). De ontwikkeling van wetenschap. Een inleiding in de wetenschapsfilosofie. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijksterhuis, E. J. (1950). De Mechanisering van het Wereldbeeld. 6th edition, 1989. Amsterdam: Meulenhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2008). Shaping the ICT research and innovation agenda for the next decade. Report on the European Commission’s Public On-line Consultation. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved Februari 23, 2011 from http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/newsroom/cf/itemlongdetail.cfm?item_id=2521 Internet World Stats (2011) Data retrieved Mai 4, 2011 from http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm

  • Kaestle, C. (1993). The awful reputation of education research. Educational Researcher, 22(1), 23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, R. (1998). The Internet as the ultimate technology and panacea. Educational Technology, 38(1), 63–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearsley, G. (1998). Educational technology: a critique. Educational Technology, 38(1), 47–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laaser, W. (1986). Some didactic aspects of audio-cassettes in distance education. Distance Education, 7(1), 143–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagemann, E. C., & Shulman, L. S. (1999). Issues in education research: problems and possibilities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2, 34–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lover, E., Radlinski, F., Crespi, V. H., Millet, J., & Cushing, L. (2004). Online study behavior of 100,000 students preparing for the SAT, ACT, AND GRE. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(3), 255–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirande, M. (2006). De onstuitbare opkomst van de leermachine. Assen: Koninklijke Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onderwijsraad. (2008). Onderwijs en maatschappelijke verwachtingen. Den Haag: Onderwijsraad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressey, S. L. (1926). A simple apparatus which gives tests and scores and teaches. School and Society, 23(586), 373–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressey, S. L. (1933). Psychology and the New education. New York: Harper and Bros.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiser, R. A. (1987). Instructional technology: a history. In R. M. Gagne (Ed.), Instructional technology. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, T. (2005). Design-based research for advancing educational technology. In M. Valcke, K. de Cock, D. Gombeir, and R. Vanderlinde (Eds.), Meten en Onderwijskundig onderzoek. Proceedings van de 32e Onderwijs Research Dagen (pp. 33–39). Universiteit Gent, Vakgroep Onderwijskunde, Gent.

  • Reeves, T. (2006). Design research from a technology perspective. In J. Van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 52–66). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, V. (1998). Methodology and the research-practice Gap. Educational Researcher, 27(1), 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, S. B. (1993). The predictable failure of educational reform: Can we change course before it’s too late? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C., & Cleary, C. (1995). Engines for education. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, J. P. (1983). The verification of independent variables in teaching methods research. Educational Researcher, 12(8), 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1958). Teaching machines. Science, 128(3330), 969–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sleeman, D., & Brown, J. S. (1982). Intelligent tutoring systems. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, D. E. (1997). Toward a new research paradigm. Pasteur’s quadrant: basic science and technological innovation. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E. L. (1905). Elements of psychology. New York: A.G. Seiler.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Von Mises, L. (1957). Theory and history, an interpretation of social and economic evolution. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westera, W. (2005). Beyond functionality and technocracy: creating human involvement with educational technology. Educational Technology and Society, 8(1), 28–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westera, W. (2010). Food for thought: what education could learn from agriculture. Educational Technology Magazine, 50(6), 37–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westera, W. (2006). The E-Learning Cabaret: Do’s and Don’ts in E-Learning Design, Book of Abstracts, Online Educa Berlin, 12th International Conference on Technology Supported Learning and Teaching (pp. 169–171). Berlin: ICWE-GmbH.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wim Westera.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Westera, W. The eventful genesis of educational media. Educ Inf Technol 17, 345–360 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-011-9162-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-011-9162-z

Keywords

Navigation