Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pupils’ attitudes towards school science as they transfer from an ICT-rich primary school to a secondary school with fewer ICT resources: Does ICT matter?

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The first part of this study was carried out in a primary school in a rural part of Wales in the United Kingdom. All classrooms were equipped with interactive whiteboards (IWBs) linked to a teacher’s computer and six PCs for pupil use. Teaching through ICT was the prevalent culture in the school. Thirty year six pupils [aged 10–11 years] were selected at random from the final year cohort and were interviewed to determine their views about school science and their views about the teaching methods employed. The pupils moved to a medium sized secondary school where the teachers were beginning to develop their ICT skills and the availability of the computers was limited. The group was re-interviewed after 3 months, once they had settled in to their new school, and were again asked their views about school science and the way it was taught. While in the primary school, pupils expected to use ICT in every lesson, they enjoyed the way information was presented and they were interested in finding things out for themselves when given the opportunity. The lack of ICT in the secondary school caused some frustration, but this was mostly with the teaching of ICT, and the group remained predominantly enthusiastic about science. Those who were less keen on science indicated that it was a teacher factor rather than anything to do with the resources being used. In general the pupils particularly enjoyed the practical aspects of science lessons, something that they had not experienced in the primary school, which compensated for the relative lack of ICT in science teaching.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, C. (2001). ICT: Changing education. London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, C. (2006). PowerPoint, habits of minds, and classroom culture. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(4), 389–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, G. (2004). Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard in primary schools: Towards an effective transition framework. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(3), 327–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, G., & Parkinson, J. (2004). Pupils’ perspectives of science as they transfer from ICT-rich primary school to a secondary school with fewer ICT resources. Paper Presented at BERA (British Educational Research Association) Conference, Manchester, 6–18th September 2004.

  • Beauchamp, G., & Parkinson, J. (2005). Beyond the ‘wow’ factor: Developing interactivity with the interactive whiteboard. School Science Review, 86(316), 97–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • BECTA (2001). Primary schools of the future: Achieving today. Coventry: BECTA.

    Google Scholar 

  • BECTA (2002). Impact2: Final report. Coventry: BECTA.

    Google Scholar 

  • BECTA (2003). What the research says about virtual learning environments in teaching and learning. ICT Research. Coventry: BECTA.

    Google Scholar 

  • BECTA (2004). ICT in schools survey 2004. London: DfES.

    Google Scholar 

  • BECTA (2005). Evaluation of curriculum online: Emerging findings from the third survey of schools. Coventry.

  • Boyle, B., & Bragg, J. (2005). No science today—The demise of primary science. Curriculum Journal, 16(4), 423–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braund, M., & Driver, M. (2005). Pupils’ perceptions of practical science in primary and secondary school: Implications for improving progression and continuity of learning. Educational Research, 47(1), 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breakwell, G. M., & Beardsell, S. (1992). Gender, parental and peer influences upon science: Attitudes and activities. Public Understanding of Science, 1, 183–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, K., & Muschamp, Y. (2006). Learning about learning in the primary school. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(1), 49–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, M. (1996). The software scene in science. Education in Science, 167, 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, M. (1997). The effects of information technology on students’ motivation. London: National Council for Education Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, M. (2000). Information and communications technologies: Their role and value for science education. In M. Monk, & J. Osborne (Eds.) Good practice in science teaching: What research has to say. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, M., & Abbott, C. (2004). ICT and attainment—A review of the research literature. DfES/BECTA.

  • Cox, M., & Webb, M. (2004). ICT and pedagogy—A review of the research literature. DfES/BECTA.

  • DfES (2004). Information and communications technology in schools in England. London: Department for Education and Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, M. (2002). Continuity and progression in science teaching at key stages 2 and 3. Cambridge Journal of Education, 32(2), 249–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galton, M., Gray, J., & Rudduck, J. (1999). The impact of school transitions and transfers on pupil progress and attainment. Nottingham: DfEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, P. L. (1975). Attitudes to science. Studies in Science Education, 2, 1–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P. L., & Stodolsky, S. (1995). Content as context: The role of school subjects in secondary school teaching. Educational Researcher, 24(8), 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, I., & Higgins, S. (2005). Primary school students’ perceptions of interactive whiteboards. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 102–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S. (2002). Innovative pedagogical practices using ICT in schools in England. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 449–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkey, R., & Clay, J. (1999). Science in context: Change in scientific perception from primary school to secondary school. Education 3–13, 27(2), 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendley, D., Parkinson, J., Stables, A., & Tanner, H. (1995). Gender differences in pupil attitudes to the national curriculum foundation subjects of English, mathematics, science and technology in Key Stage 3 in South Wales. Educational Studies, 21, 85–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, T., & Pell, A. (2002). Changes in primary boys’ and girls’ attitudes to school and science during a two-year science in-service programme. Curriculum Journal, 13(1), 43–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennewell, S. (2001). Using affordances and constraints to evaluate the use of information and communication technology in teaching and learning. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10(1&2), 101–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennewell, S., & Beauchamp, G. (2003). The influence of a technology-rich classroom environment on elementary teachers’ pedagogy and children’s learning. International Federation for Information Processing Working Group 3.5 Open Conference, Sydney, Australia, Australian Computer Society Inc.

  • Linklater, H. (2006). Listening to children: Children playing and talking about the reception year of early years education in the UK. Early Years, 26(1), 63–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane, A., & Sakellariou, A. (2002). The role of ICT in science education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 32(2), 219–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, C., & Beggs, J. (2001). Pupils’ attitudes, perceptions and understanding of primary science: Comparisons between Northern Irish and English schools. BERA: University of Leeds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, W., & Gunstone, R. (2002). Students’ perceptions of the effectiveness of the world wide web as a research and teaching tool in science learning. Research in Science Education, 32, 489–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2000). Pupils’ and parents’ views of the school science curriculum. London: King’s College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2001). Pupils’ views of the role and value of the science curriculum: A focus-group study. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 441–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, J. (2004). Improving secondary science teaching. London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, L., & Finlayson, H. (2004). Developing successful pedagogy with information and communications technology: How are science teachers meeting the challenge? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(3), 287–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. J., Higgins, S., Wall, K., & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: Boon or bandwagon? A critical review of literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 91–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somekh, B., & Davies, R. (1991). Towards a pedagogy for information technology. Curriculum Journal, 2(2), 153–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, R. (2004). Designs for learning: ICT and knowledge in the classroom. Computers and Education, 43, 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tebbutt, M. (2000). ICT in science: Problems, possibilities and principles? School Science Review, 81(297), 57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, M. E. (2005). Affordances of ICT in science learning: Implications for an integrated pedagogy. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 705–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youngman, M. (1978). Six reactions to school transfer. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 48(4), 280–289.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary Beauchamp.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beauchamp, G., Parkinson, J. Pupils’ attitudes towards school science as they transfer from an ICT-rich primary school to a secondary school with fewer ICT resources: Does ICT matter?. Educ Inf Technol 13, 103–118 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-007-9053-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-007-9053-5

Keywords

Navigation