Skip to main content
Log in

Recommendations for a Toxicological Screening ERG Procedure in Laboratory Animals

  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Electroretinography, using laboratory animals, is a commonly used technique for determining the retinal toxicity of chemical agents. In this paper, guidelines for performing this test are provided. The physiologic basis for visual testing is presented with attention to inter-species differences. Technical aspects of animal recordings are reviewed, including animal preparation, stimulation, signal conditioning, recording and data analysis. Finally, suggested protocols for recording in diurnal and nocturnal species are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. AU Bayer P Cook SE Brodie et al. (2001) ArticleTitleEvaluation of different recording parameters to establish a standard for flash eletroretinography in rodents Vis Res 41 2173–2185 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00103-1 Occurrence Handle11448710

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. MF Marmor GE Holder MW Seeliger S. Yamamoto (2004) ArticleTitleStandard for clinical electroretinography (2004 update) Doc Ophthalmol 108 107–114 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:DOOP.0000036793.44912.45 Occurrence Handle15455793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. M Brigell M Bach C Barber A Moskowitz J. Robson (2003) ArticleTitleGuidelines for calibration of stimulus and recording parameters used in clinical electrophysiology of vision Doc Ophthalmol 107 185–193 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1026244901657 Occurrence Handle14661909

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. K Narfstrom B Ekesten SG Rosolen et al. (2002) ArticleTitleGuidelines for clinical electroretinography in the dog Doc Ophthamol 105 83–92 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1020524305726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. PK Ahnelt H Kolb (2000) ArticleTitleThe mammalian photoreceptor mosaic-adaptative design Prog Retin Eye Res 19 711–777 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1350-9462(00)00012-4 Occurrence Handle11029553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. GH Jacobs (1993) ArticleTitleThe distribution and nature of colour vision among the mammals Biol Rev 68 413–471 Occurrence Handle10.1086/418174 Occurrence Handle8347768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. J Wu AD Marmorstein P Kofuji NS Peachey (2004) ArticleTitleContribution of Kir4.1 to the mouse electroretinogram Mol Vis 10 650–654 Occurrence Handle15359216

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. GM Aylward (1989) ArticleTitleA simple method of fitting the Naka-Rushton equation Clin Vis Sci 4 275–277

    Google Scholar 

  9. M Rufiange S Rousseau O Dembinska P Lachapelle (2002) ArticleTitleCone-dominated ERG luminance-response function: the Photopic Hill revisited Doc Ophthamol 104 231–248 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1015265812018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. N Wali LE Leguire (1990) ArticleTitleOn the method for fitting the Naka-Rushton equation: corrections to Aylaward (1989) Clin Vis Sci 6 79

    Google Scholar 

  11. M Hébert P Lachapelle M Dulmont (1996) ArticleTitleReproducibility of electroretinograms recorded with DTL electrodes Doc Ophthamol 91 333–342 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01214651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M Kondo PA Sieving (2001) ArticleTitlePrimate photopic sine-wave flicker ERG: vector modelling analysis of component origins using glutamate analogs Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42 305–312 Occurrence Handle11133883

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. VR Krishna KR Alexander NS Peachey (2002) ArticleTitleTemporal properties of the mouse cone electroretinogram J Neurophysiol 87 42–48 Occurrence Handle11784728

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. V Chaudhary R Hansen H Lindgren A Fulton (2003) ArticleTitleEffects of telazol and Nembutal on retinal responses Doc Ophthalmol 107 45–51 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1024444113700 Occurrence Handle12906121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. F Tremblay JE Parkinson (2003) ArticleTitleAlteration of electroretinographic recordings when performed under sedation or halogenate anaesthesia in a pediatric population Doc Ophthalmol 107 271–279 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:DOOP.0000005336.08147.fc Occurrence Handle14711159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. J Kong P Gouras (2003) ArticleTitleThe effect of body temperature on the murine electroretinogram Doc Ophthalmol 106 239–242 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1022988332578 Occurrence Handle12737500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Y Goto (1995–96) ArticleTitleAn electrode to record the mouse cornea electroretinogram Doc Ophthalmol 91 147–154 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01203694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. BT Sagdullaev PJ DeMarco MA McCall (2004) ArticleTitleImproved contact lens electrode for corneal ERG recordings in mice Doc Ophthalmol 108 181–184 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10633-004-5734-1 Occurrence Handle15573941

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosolen, S.G., Rigaudière, F., Gargasson, JF.L. et al. Recommendations for a Toxicological Screening ERG Procedure in Laboratory Animals. Doc Ophthalmol 110, 57–66 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-005-7344-y

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-005-7344-y

Keywords

Navigation