Skip to main content
Log in

Comment on Trinch’s risky subjects

Risky narratives in courtroom testimony

  • Published:
Dialectical Anthropology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. Small capitals indicate raised volume; the symbol ° before and after an utterance indicate that it was very low in volume; underlining indicates emphasis; and a hyphen after a word indicates a pause of less than half a second. The full transcript of this exchange is given in Eades (2008a, pp. 103–104).

References

  • Eades, Diana. 2006. Lexical struggle in court: Aboriginal Australians vs the state. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10 (2): 153–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eades, Diana. 2008a. Courtroom talk and neocolonial control. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eades, Diana. 2008b. Telling and retelling your story in court: questions, assumptions and intercultural implications. Current Issues in Criminal Justice 20 (2): 209–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, Susan. 2001. Representing rape: language and sexual consent. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Matoesian, Gregory. 1993. Reproducing rape: domination through talk in the courtroom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matoesian, Gregory. 2001. Law and the language of identity: discourse in the William Kennedy smith rape trial. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trinch, Shonna. 2003. Latinas’ narratives of domestic abuse: discrepant versions of violence. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diana Eades.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eades, D. Comment on Trinch’s risky subjects. Dialect Anthropol 34, 209–213 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-009-9127-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-009-9127-4

Keywords

Navigation