Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Impact of Bacterial or Fungal Infections in Acute Liver Failure Patients from India

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

We evaluated the prevalence, risk factors, and impact of bacterial/fungal infections in acute liver failure (ALF) patients.

Methods

We analyzed clinical, biochemical, and microbiological data of ALF patients with and without bacterial/fungal infections admitted at an institute over the last 5 years.

Results

We enrolled 143 patients, 50% males, median age 25 years, with acute viral hepatitis (32.2%), drug-induced injury (18.2%), and tropical illness (14%) as aetiologies of ALF. 110 patients (76.9%) developed bacterial/fungal infections [Bacterial infection: MDR: 70%, PDR: 7%, ESBL: 40%, CRE: 30%, CRAB: 26.6%, MDR-EF: 13.3% and fungal infection: 19 (17.3%)].

On univariable analysis, SIRS (33.6% vs.3%), ICU admission (78.2% vs. 45.5%), mechanical ventilation (88.2% vs. 51.5%), inotropes (39.1% vs. 6.1%), invasive catheters (91.8% vs. 39.4%), and prolonged catheterization (6 days vs. 0 days) were significant risk factors for infections (p < 0.05, each). In contrast, SIRS and catheterization independently predicted infection on multivariable regression.

Organ failures [3 (2–4) vs. 1 (0–2)], grade-III–IV HE (67.3% vs. 33.3%), circulatory failure (39.1% vs. 6.1%), coagulopathy (INR > 2.5: 58.2% vs. 33.3%), renal injury (28.2% vs. 6.1%) (p < 0.05), MELD (32.9 ± 8.2 vs. 26.7 ± 8.3) and CPIS [3(2–4) vs. 2(0–2)] were higher in infected vs. non-infected patients (p < 0.001). 30-day survival was significantly lower in infected vs. non-infected patients (17.3% vs. 75.8%, p < 0.001), while no patient survived with fungal infections. Refractory septic shock was the commonest cause of mortality in patients.

Conclusions

Infections due to MDR organisms are high, fungal infections are fatal, and refractory septic shock is the dominant reason for mortality, implying bacterial and fungal infections as the major killer in ALF patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data are not publicly available but is available by contacting the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

ALF:

Acute liver failure

MDR:

Multidrug-resistant

PDR:

Pandrug-resistant

ESBLs:

Extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing organisms

CRE:

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae

CRAB:

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

MDR-ef:

Multidrug-resistant Enterococcus faecium

MELD:

Model for end-stage liver diseases

CPI:

Score, clinical prognostic indicator score

SIRS:

Systemic inflammatory response syndrome

ICU:

Intensive care unit

HE:

Hepatic encephalopathy

INR:

International normalized ratio

BDG:

Beta-D glucan

GMI:

Galactomannan Index

CDC/NHSN:

Centre for disease control and prevention-national heath safety network

EORTC/MSG:

European organization for research and treatment of cancer mycoses study group criteria

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

FNAC:

Fine needle aspiration cytology

CLIF-SOFA:

Chronic liver failure-sequential organ failure assessment

SD:

Standard deviation

IQR:

Interquartile range

MDRO:

Multidrug-resistant organisms

KCC:

King's College criteria

BSI:

Blood stream infections

HEV:

Hepatitis E virus

References

  1. Anand AC, Nandi B, Acharya SK et al. Indian National Association for the Study of the Liver Consensus Statement on Acute Liver Failure (Part 1): Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Presentation and Prognosis. J Clin Exp Hepatol 2020;10:339–376.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Possamai LA, Thursz MR, Wendon JA et al. Modulation of monocyte/macrophage function: a therapeutic strategy in the treatment of acute liver failure. J Hepatol 2014;61:439–445.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Antoniades CG, Berry PA, Wendon JA et al. The importance of immune dysfunction in determining outcome in acute liver failure. J Hepatol 2008;49:845–861.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Antoniades CG, Quaglia A, Taams LS et al. Source and characterization of hepatic macrophages in acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure in humans. Hepatology 2012;56:735–746.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Antoniades CG, Berry PA, Davies ET et al. Reduced monocyte HLA-DR expression: a novel biomarker of disease severity and outcome in acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure. Hepatology 2006;44:34–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vaquero J, Polson J, Chung C et al. Infection and the progression of hepatic encephalopathy in acute liver failure. Gastroenterology 2003;125:755–764.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cuschieri S. The STROBE guidelines. Saudi J Anaesth 2019;13:S31–S34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Wendon J, Cordoba J, Dhawan A et al. EASL Clinical Practical Guidelines on the management of acute (fulminant) liver failure. J Hepatol 2017;66:1047–1081.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee WM, Stravitz RT, Larson AM. Introduction to the revised American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases Position Paper on acute liver failure 2011. Hepatology 2012;55:965–967.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control 2008;36:309–332.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bajaj JS, O’Leary JG, Reddy KR et al. Second infections independently increase mortality in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis: the North American consortium for the study of end-stage liver disease (NACSELD) experience. Hepatology 2012;56:2328–2335.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect 2012;18:268–281.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Verma N, Singh S, Taneja S et al. Invasive fungal infections amongst patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure at high risk for fungal infections. Liver Int 2019;39:503–513.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Verma N, Singh S, Singh M et al. Global epidemiological burden of fungal infections in cirrhosis patients: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Mycoses 2022;65:266–284.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Moreau R, Jalan R, Gines P et al. Acute-on-chronic liver failure is a distinct syndrome that develops in patients with acute decompensation of cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 2013;144:1426-37-37.e1-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Acharya SK, Panda SK, Saxena A et al. Acute hepatic failure in India: a perspective from the East. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2000;15:473–479.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rolando N, Harvey F, Brahm J et al. Fungal infection: a common, unrecognised complication of acute liver failure. J Hepatol 1991;12:1–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Karvellas CJ, Cavazos J, Battenhouse H et al. Effects of Antimicrobial Prophylaxis and Blood Stream Infections in Patients With Acute Liver Failure: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2014;12:1942–9.e1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Rolando N, Harvey F, Brahm J et al. Prospective study of bacterial infection in acute liver failure: an analysis of fifty patients. Hepatology 1990;11:49–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rolando N, Wade J, Davalos M et al. The systemic inflammatory response syndrome in acute liver failure. Hepatology 2000;32:734–739.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gupta T, Lochan D, Verma N et al. Prediction of 28-day mortality in acute decompensation of cirrhosis through the presence of multidrug-resistant infections at admission. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020;35:461–466.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bhattacharya C, Das-Mondal M, Gupta D et al. Infection in cirrhosis: A prospective study. Ann Hepatol 2019;18:862–868.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Khuroo MS. Acute liver failure in India. Hepatology 1997;26:244–246.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shalimar, Kedia S, Gunjan D et al. Acute Liver Failure Due to Hepatitis E Virus Infection Is Associated with Better Survival than Other Etiologies in Indian Patients. Dig Dis Sci 2017;62:1058–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Anand AC, Nandi B, Acharya SK et al. Erratum to “Indian National Association for the Study of Liver Consensus Statement on Acute Liver Failure (Part-2): Management of Acute Liver Failure” [J Clin Exp Hepatol 10 (2020) 477–517]. J Clin Exp Hepatol 2022;12:729–730.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Goel A, Lalruatsanga D, Himanshu D, Bharti V, Sharma D. Acute Liver Failure Prognostic Criteria: It’s Time to Revisit. Cureus 2023;15:e33810.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Kamath PS, Heimbach J, Wiesner RH. Acute Liver Failure Prognostic Scores: Is Good Enough Good Enough? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;14:621–623.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cholongitas E, Theocharidou E, Vasianopoulou P et al. Comparison of the sequential organ failure assessment score with the King’s College Hospital criteria and the model for end-stage liver disease score for the prognosis of acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure. Liver Transpl 2012;18:405–412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Saluja V, Sharma A, Pasupuleti SS et al. Comparison of Prognostic Models in Acute Liver Failure: Decision is to be Dynamic. Indian J Crit Care Med 2019;23:574–581.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Dhiman RK, Jain S, Maheshwari U et al. Early indicators of prognosis in fulminant hepatic failure: an assessment of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) and King’s College Hospital criteria. Liver Transpl 2007;13:814–821.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

NV designed the study, analysed the data, reviewed the manuscript. PK collected the data and drafted the manuscript. AV collected the data and revised the manuscript. PG, SR, AD, MP, ST, AD, VS, RKD revised and reviewed the manuscript. All the authors approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nipun Verma.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have not disclosed any competing interests.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by ethics committee of Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India (NK/7445/Study/582).

Informed consent

N/A.

Research involving human and animal participants

N/A.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 208 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 88 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaur, P., Verma, N., Valsan, A. et al. Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Impact of Bacterial or Fungal Infections in Acute Liver Failure Patients from India. Dig Dis Sci 68, 4022–4038 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-023-07971-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-023-07971-9

Keywords

Navigation