Skip to main content
Log in

Watching Videos of Colonoscopies and Receiving Interpretations Reduce Pain and Anxiety While Increasing the Satisfaction of Patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Pain associated with colonoscopies is a major barrier to patients participating in colorectal cancer screenings. While sedation and analgesia are used to reduce pain during the procedure, they are associated with increased complications and costs. Thus, it is necessary to identity novel techniques to relieve pain in a safe and cost-effective way.

Aims

To test whether watching real-time videos of colonoscopies while receiving detailed interpretations of the procedures reduces pain and anxiety and increases a patient’s satisfaction.

Methods

Patients were randomized into three groups including a group who watched real-time videos of their colonoscopies (Group A), a group who watched real-time videos of their colonoscopies while receiving detailed interpretations of the procedures from the endoscopists (Group B), and a group who did not receive either method (Group C).

Results

Pain and anxiety scores were significantly (Group A vs. Group C, \(p < 0.001\); Group B vs. Group C, \(p < 0.001\)) lower in Groups A and B compared to Group C. Additionally, significantly (Group A vs. Group C, \(p = 0.008\); Group B vs. Group C, \(p < 0.001\)) increased satisfaction was observed in Groups A and B compared to Group C. There were no statistically significant differences observed in the pain and anxiety scores when comparing Groups A and B. However, the overall satisfaction score was significantly (\(p = 0.02\)) higher in Group B compared to Group A.

Conclusions

Real-time videos of colonoscopies as well as videos along with detailed interpretations of the procedures decrease pain and anxiety while improving satisfaction in patients undergoing colonoscopies without sedation. Videos combined with interpretations lead to a greater increase in patient satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:87–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1977–1981.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ, et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:687–696.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ghevariya V, Duddempudi S, Ghevariya N, et al. Barriers to screening colonoscopy in an urban population: a study to help focus further efforts to attain full compliance. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013;28:1497–1503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Terruzzi V, Meucci G, Radaelli F, et al. Routine versus “on demand” sedation and analgesia for colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:169–174.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chokhavatia S, Nguyen L, Williams R, et al. Sedation and analgesia for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993;88:393–396.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Krigel A, Chen L, Wright JD, et al. Substantial increase in anesthesia assistance for outpatient colonoscopy and associated cost nationwide. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17:2489–2496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bielawska B, Hookey LC, Sutradhar R, et al. Anesthesia assistance in outpatient colonoscopy and risk of aspiration pneumonia, bowel perforation, and splenic injury. Gastroenterology. 2018;154(77–85):e3.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eckardt VF, Kanzler G, Schmitt T, et al. Complications and adverse effects of colonoscopy with selective sedation. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;49:560–565.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lembo T, Fitzgerald L, Matin K, et al. Audio and visual stimulation reduces patient discomfort during screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;93:1113–1116.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ovayolu N, Ucan O, Pehlivan S, et al. Listening to Turkish classical music decreases patients’ anxiety, pain, dissatisfaction and the dose of sedative and analgesic drugs during colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:7532–7536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Umezawa S, Higurashi T, Uchiyama S, et al. Visual distraction alone for the improvement of colonoscopy-related pain and satisfaction. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:4707–4714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bashiri M, Akcali D, Coskun D, et al. Evaluation of pain and patient satisfaction by music therapy in patients with endoscopy/colonoscopy. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2018;29:574–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. De Silva AP, Niriella MA, Nandamuni Y, et al. Effect of audio and visual distraction on patients undergoing colonoscopy: a randomized controlled study. Endosc Int Open. 2016;4:E1211–E1214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Xiaolian J, Xiaolin L, Lan ZH. Effects of visual and audiovisual distraction on pain and anxiety among patients undergoing colonoscopy. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2015;38:55–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Peck CL, King NJ. Compliance and the doctor-patient relationship. Drugs. 1985;30:78–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Toomey DP, Hackett-Brennan M, Corrigan G, et al. Effective communication enhances the patients’ endoscopy experience. Ir J Med Sci. 2016;185:203–214.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bernstein C, Thorn M, Monsees K, et al. A prospective study of factors that determine cecal intubation time at colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:72–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee DW, Chan AC, Wong SK, et al. Can visual distraction decrease the dose of patient-controlled sedation required during colonoscopy? A prospective randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy. 2004;36:197–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Seminowicz DA, Mikulis DJ, Davis KD. Cognitive modulation of pain-related brain responses depends on behavioral strategy. Pain. 2004;112:48–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ko SY, Leung DY, Wong EM. Effects of easy listening music intervention on satisfaction, anxiety, and pain in patients undergoing colonoscopy: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Clin Interv Aging. 2019;14:977–986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the staff and patients of the Wuhan Union Hospital endoscopy unit for their cooperation in this study. This study was supported in part by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (No. 2017YFC0113603).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhen Ding.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sheng, LP., Han, CQ., Nie, C. et al. Watching Videos of Colonoscopies and Receiving Interpretations Reduce Pain and Anxiety While Increasing the Satisfaction of Patients. Dig Dis Sci 66, 541–546 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06186-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06186-6

Keywords

Navigation