Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

EUS-Guided Choledochoduodenostomy for Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction Using Electrocautery-Enhanced Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents: First US, Multicenter Experience

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and Aims

EUS-guided biliary drainage has emerged as a technique to enable endobiliary drainage in failed ERCP. A newer model, lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS), with a cautery-enhanced delivery system became available in the USA in late 2015. This cautery-tipped version may facilitate EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CD), but data using this model are lacking.

Methods

We reviewed outcomes of attempted EUS-CD using cautery-enhanced LAMS from 6, US centers. The following data were collected: patient and procedure details, technical success, adverse events, clinical success (resolution of jaundice or improvement in bilirubin > 50%), and biliary re-interventions.

Results

EUS-CD was attempted in 67 patients (mean age 68.8) with malignant obstruction after failed ERCP between September 2015 and April 2018. EUS-CD was technically successful in 64 (95.5%). A plastic or metal stent was inserted through the lumen of the deployed LAMS in 50 of 64 (78.1%) patients to maintain a non-perpendicular LAMS axis into the bile duct. Adverse events occurred in 4 (6.3%) and included: abdominal pain (n = 2), peritonitis that responded to antibiotics (n = 1), and bleeding requiring transfusion (n = 1). Among 40 patients with follow-up of > 4 weeks, clinical success was achieved in 100%. Biliary re-interventions for obstruction were needed in 7(17.5%), in 3 of 6 (50.0%) that underwent EUS-CD with LAMS alone versus 4 of 34 (5%) with LAMS plus an axis-orienting stent (p = 0.02).

Conclusion

EUS-CD using LAMS with cautery-enhanced delivery systems has high technical and clinical success rates, with a low rate of adverse events. Inserting an axis-orienting stent through the lumen of the LAMS may reduce the need for biliary re-interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Enochsson L, Swahn F, Arnelo U, Nilsson M, Lohr M, Persson G. Nationwide, population-based data from 11,074 ERCP procedures from the Swedish Registry for Gallstone Surgery and ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:1175–1184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2010.07.047. 84 e1–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Peng C, Nietert PJ, Cotton PB, Lackland DT, Romagnuolo J. Predicting native papilla biliary cannulation success using a multinational Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Quality Network. BMC Gastroenterol. 2013;13:147. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-13-147.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Williams EJ, Ogollah R, Thomas P, et al. What predicts failed cannulation and therapy at ERCP? Results of a large-scale multicenter analysis. Endoscopy. 2012;44:674–683. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1309345.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Giovannini M, Moutardier V, Pesenti C, Bories E, Lelong B, Delpero JR. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided bilioduodenal anastomosis: a new technique for biliary drainage. Endoscopy. 2001;33:898–900. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2001-17324.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee TH, Choi JH, do Park H, et al. Similar efficacies of endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural and percutaneous drainage for malignant distal biliary obstruction. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14:1011–1019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2015.12.032. e3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nennstiel S, Weber A, Frick G, et al. Drainage-related Complications in percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage: an analysis over 10 years. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015;49:764–770. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000000275.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Burmester E, Niehaus J, Leineweber T, Huetteroth T. EUS-cholangio-drainage of the bile duct: report of 4 cases. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;57:246–251. https://doi.org/10.1067/mge.2003.85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kawakubo K, Isayama H, Kato H, et al. Multicenter retrospective study of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction in Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014;21:328–334. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kunda R, Perez-Miranda M, Will U, et al. EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy for malignant distal biliary obstruction using a lumen-apposing fully covered metal stent after failed ERCP. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:5002–5008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4845-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tsuchiya T, Teoh AYB, Itoi T, et al. Long-term outcomes of EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy using a lumen-apposing metal stent for malignant distal biliary obstruction: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:1138–1146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2017.08.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Soehendra N, Reynders-Frederix V. Palliative bile duct drainage—a new endoscopic method of introducing a transpapillary drain. Endoscopy. 1980;12:8–11. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1021702.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dhir V, Isayama H, Itoi T, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary and pancreatic duct interventions. Dig Endosc. 2017;29:472–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.12818.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ogura T, Higuchi K. Does endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage really have clinical impact? World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:1049–1052. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i4.1049.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Yamao K, Kitano M, Takenaka M, et al. Outcomes of endoscopic biliary drainage in pancreatic cancer patients with an indwelling gastroduodenal stent: a multicenter cohort study in West Japan. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:66–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2018.01.021. e2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hara K, Yamao K, Niwa Y, et al. Prospective clinical study of EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy for malignant lower biliary tract obstruction. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:1239–1245. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2011.84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gupta K, Perez-Miranda M, Kahaleh M, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-assisted bile duct access and drainage: multicenter, long-term analysis of approach, outcomes, and complications of a technique in evolution. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014;48:80–87. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0b013e31828c6822.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fabbri C, Luigiano C, Fuccio L, et al. EUS-guided biliary drainage with placement of a new partially covered biliary stent for palliation of malignant biliary obstruction: a case series. Endoscopy. 2011;43:438–441. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1256097.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bang JY, Navaneethan U, Hasan M, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S. Stent placement by EUS or ERCP for primary biliary decompression in pancreatic cancer: a randomized trial (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2018.03.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Paik WH, Lee TH, Park DH, et al. EUS-guided biliary drainage versus ERCP for the Primary palliation of malignant biliary obstruction: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018;. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41395-018-0122-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Martins FP, Rossini LG, Ferrari AP. Migration of a covered metallic stent following endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy: fatal complication. Endoscopy. 2010;42:E126–E127. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1243911.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Paik WH, Lee TH, Park DH, et al. EUS-guided biliary drainage versus ERCP for the primary palliation of malignant biliary obstruction: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018;113:987–997. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41395-018-0122-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Anderloni A, Fugazza A, Troncone E, et al. Single-stage EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy using a lumen-apposing metal stent for malignant distal biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;89:69–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2018.08.047.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdul H. El Chafic.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

AE, TB, KB, JN, SI, and JS have served as consultants for Boston Scientific. KB is the inventor of AXIOS stent and delivery system. MK has received research funding from Boston Scientific.

Ethical approval

An institutional review board approval was obtained at each participating site for this retrospective study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

El Chafic, A.H., Shah, J.N., Hamerski, C. et al. EUS-Guided Choledochoduodenostomy for Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction Using Electrocautery-Enhanced Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents: First US, Multicenter Experience. Dig Dis Sci 64, 3321–3327 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-019-05688-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-019-05688-2

Keywords

Navigation