Abstract
Background
Health insurance coverage changes for many patients after liver transplantation, but the implications of this change on long-term outcomes are unclear.
Aims
To assess post-transplant patient and graft survival according to change in insurance coverage within 1 year of transplantation.
Methods
We queried the United Network for Organ Sharing for patients between ages 18–64 years undergoing liver transplantation in 2002–2016. Patients surviving > 1 year were categorized by insurance coverage at transplantation and the 1-year transplant anniversary. Multivariable Cox regression characterized the association between coverage pattern and long-term patient or graft survival.
Results
Among 34,487 patients in the analysis, insurance coverage patterns included continuous private coverage (58%), continuous public coverage (29%), private to public transition (8%) and public to private transition (4%). In multivariable analysis of patient survival, continuous public insurance (HR 1.29, CI 1.22, 1.37, p < 0.001), private to public transition (HR 1.17, CI 1.07, 1.28, p < 0.001), and public to private transition (HR 1.14, CI 1.00, 1.29, p = 0.044), were associated with greater mortality hazard, compared to continuous private coverage. After disaggregating public coverage by source, mortality hazard was highest for patients transitioning from private insurance to Medicaid (HR vs. continuous private coverage = 1.32; 95% CI 1.14, 1.52; p < 0.001). Similar differences by insurance category were found for death-censored graft failure.
Conclusion
Post-transplant transition to public insurance coverage is associated with higher risk of adverse outcomes when compared to retaining private coverage.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- LT:
-
Liver transplantation
- ESLD:
-
End-stage liver disease
- MELD:
-
Model for end-stage liver disease
- ACA:
-
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
- US:
-
United States of America
- UNOS:
-
United Network for Organ Sharing
- ANOVA:
-
Analysis of variance
- TIPSS:
-
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt
- DRI:
-
Donor risk index
- LOS:
-
Length of stay
- HR:
-
Hazard ratios
- CI:
-
Confidence interval
- ACS:
-
American College of Surgeons
References
Martin P, DiMartini A, Feng S, Brown R, Fallon M. Evaluation for liver transplantation in adults: 2013 practice guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the American Society of Transplantation. Hepatology. 2014;59:1144–1165. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.26972.
UNOS. Transplant trends | UNOS. https://www.unos.org/data/transplant-trends/, 2017. Accessed 21 Feb 2018.
Barritt AS, Telloni SA, Potter CW, Gerber DA, Hayashi PH. Local access to subspecialty care influences the chance of receiving a liver transplant. Liver Transplant. 2013;19:377–382. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.23588.
Adler JT, Dong N, Markmann JF, Schoenfeld D, Yeh H. Role of patient factors and practice patterns in determining access to liver waitlist. Am J Transplant. 2015;15:1836–1842. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.13301.
Flattau A, Olaywi M, Gaglio PJ, et al. Social barriers to listing for adult liver transplantation: their prevalence and association with program characteristics. Liver Transplant. 2011;17:1167–1175. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.22357.
Parikh ND, Hutton D, Marrero W, Sanghani K, Xu Y, Lavieri M. Projections in donor organs available for liver transplantation in the United States: 2014–2025. Liver Transplant. 2015;21:855–863. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.24136.
National Coverage Determination (NCD) for Adult Liver Transplantation (260.1). https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/details/ncd-details.aspx?NCAId=259&NcaName=Liver+Transplantation+for+Malignancies&ExpandComments=n&CommentPeriod=0&NCDId=70&ncdver=3&id=186&bc=gABAAAAAEEAAAA%3d%3d&, 2017. Accessed 24 July 2017.
Yoo HY, Thuluvath PJ. Outcome of liver transplantation in adult recipients: influence of neighborhood income, education, and insurance. Liver Transplant. 2004;10:235–243. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.20069.
DuBay DA, MacLennan PA, Reed RD, et al. Insurance type and solid organ transplantation outcomes: a historical perspective on how medicaid expansion might impact transplantation outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;223:611–620.e614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.07.004.
Glueckert LN, Redden D, Thompson MA, et al. What liver transplant outcomes can be expected in the uninsured who become insured via the Affordable Care Act? Am J Transplant. 2013;13:1533–1540. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.12244.
Kemmer N, Zacharias V, Kaiser TE, Neff GW. Access to liver transplantation in the MELD era: role of ethnicity and insurance. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;54:1794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-008-0567-5.
Bryce CL, Angus DC, Arnold RM, et al. Sociodemographic differences in early access to liver transplantation services. Am J Transplant Off J Am Soc Transplant Am Soc of Transpl Surg. 2009;9:2092–2101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02737.x.
Bryce CL, Chang CC, Angus DC, Arnold RM, Farrell M, Roberts MS. The effect of race, sex, and insurance status on time-to-listing decisions for liver transplantation. J Transplant. 2010;2010:467976. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/467976.
Mejia A, Halff GA, Esterl R, et al. Outcome of liver transplantation in hispanics versus non-hispanics: is there a difference? Transplant Proc. 2002;34:1236–1238. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0041-1345(02)02799-9.
Tumin D, Beal EW, Mumtaz K, et al. Medicaid participation among liver transplant candidates after the Affordable Care Act medicaid expansion. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;225:173–180.e172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.05.004.
Tumin D, Hayes D, Washburn WK, Tobias JD, Black SM. Medicaid enrollment after liver transplantation: effects of medicaid expansion. Liver Transplant. 2016;22:1075–1084. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.24480.
Rongey C, Bambha K, Vanness D, et al. Employment and health insurance in long-term liver transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2005;5:1901–1908. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.00961.x.
Schlansky B, Shachar C. Implications of expanded medicaid eligibility for patient outcomes after liver transplantation: caveat emptor. Liver Transplant. 2016;22:1062–1064. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.24491.
Tumin D, Foraker RE, Smith S, Tobias JD, Hayes D. Health insurance trajectories and long-term survival after heart transplantation. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016;9:576–584. https://doi.org/10.1161/circoutcomes.116.003067.
@KaiserFamFound. Status of state action on the medicaid expansion decision. http://www.kff.org/health-reform/state-indicator/state-activity-around-expanding-medicaid-under-the-affordable-care-act/, 2017. Accessed 24 July 2017.
Feng S, Goodrich NP, Bragg-Gresham JL, et al. Characteristics associated with liver graft failure: the concept of a donor risk index. Am J Transplant. 2006;6:783–790. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01242.x.
Beal EW, Black SM, Mumtaz K, et al. High center volume does not mitigate risk associated with using high donor risk organs in liver transplantation. Dig Dis Sci. 2017;62:2578–2585.
Graham JW, Olchowski AE, Gilreath TD. How many imputations are really needed? Some practical clarifications of multiple imputation theory. Prev Sci. 2007;8:206–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-007-0070-9.
White IR, Royston P, Wood AM. Multiple imputation using chained equations: issues and guidance for practice. Stat Med. 2011;30:377–399. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4067.
Rosenbaum S. Medicaid payments and access to care. New Engl J Med. 2014;371:2345–2347. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1412488.
MACPAC. Examining access to care in medicaid and CHIP. https://www.macpac.gov/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Examining_Access_to_Care_in_Medicaid_and_CHIP.pdf, 2011. Accessed 11 Aug 2017.
Liao JM, Fischer MA. Restrictions of Hepatitis C treatment for substance-using medicaid patients: cost versus ethics. Am J Public Health. 2017;107:893–899. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2017.303748.
Barua S, Greenwald R, Grebely J, Dore GJ, Swan T, Taylor LE. Restrictions for medicaid reimbursement of sofosbuvir for the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in the United States. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163:215–223. https://doi.org/10.7326/M15-0406.
Dumortier J, Boillot O, Scoazec JY. Natural history, treatment and prevention of hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation: past, present and future. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:11069–11079. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i32.11069.
Beal EW, Tumin D, Mumtaz K, et al. Factors contributing to employment patterns after liver transplantation. Clin Transplant. 2017;31:e12967. https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.12967.
Breathett K, Allen LA, Helmkamp L, et al. The Affordable Care Act medicaid expansion correlated with increased heart transplant listings in African-Americans but not Hispanics or Caucasians. JACC Heart Fail. 2017;5:136–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2016.10.013.
Charles EJ, Johnston LE, Herbert MA, et al. Impact of medicaid expansion on cardiac surgery volume and outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.03.079.
Puls MW. 2015 ACS governors survey: surgeons describe the ACA’s effects on access to care. The Bulletin. http://bulletin.facs.org/2016/05/2015-acs-governors-survey-surgeons-describe-the-acas-effects-on-access-to-care/, 2016. Accessed 14 Aug 2017.
Giladi AM, Aliu O, Chung KC. The effect of medicaid expansion in New York State on use of subspecialty surgical procedures by medicaid beneficiaries and the uninsured. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218:889–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.12.048.
Al-Refaie WB, Zheng C, Jindal M, et al. Did Pre-Affordable Care Act medicaid expansion increase access to surgical cancer care? J Am Coll Surg. 2017;224:662–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.12.044.
Haider AH, Scott VK, Rehman KA, et al. Racial disparities in surgical care and outcomes in the United States: a comprehensive review of patient, provider, and systemic factors. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216:482–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.11.014.
Singh TP, Givertz MM, Semigran M, DeNofrio D, Costantino F, Gauvreau K. Socioeconomic position, ethnicity, and outcomes in heart transplant recipients. Am J Cardiol. 2010;105:1024–1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.11.015.
Martin M, Beekley A, Kjorstad R, Sebesta J. Socioeconomic disparities in eligibility and access to bariatric surgery: a national population-based analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6:8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2009.07.003.
Allen JG, Weiss ES, Arnaoutakis GJ, et al. Insurance and education predict long-term survival after orthotopic heart transplantation in the United States. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2012;31:52–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2011.07.019.
Bennett KM, Scarborough JE, Pappas TN, Kepler TB. Patient socioeconomic status is an independent predictor of operative mortality. Ann Surg. 2010;252:552–558. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181f2ac64.
Herring AA, Woolhandler S, Himmelstein DU. Insurance status of U.S. Organ Donors and Transplant Recipients: the uninsured give, but rarely receive. Int J Health Serv. 2008;38:641–652. https://doi.org/10.2190/HS.38.4.d.
@KaiserFamFound. Health insurance coverage of the total population. http://www.kff.org/other/state-indicator/total-population/, 2016. Accessed 15 Aug 2017.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Disclaimer The data reported in this manuscript were supplied by the United Network for Organ Sharing as the contractor for the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. The interpretation and reporting of these data are the responsibility of the authors and in no way should be seen as an official policy of or interpretation by the OPTN or the U.S. Government.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Akateh, C., Tumin, D., Beal, E.W. et al. Change in Health Insurance Coverage After Liver Transplantation Can Be Associated with Worse Outcomes. Dig Dis Sci 63, 1463–1472 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-5031-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-5031-6