Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

HKLC Triages More Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients to Curative Therapies Compared to BCLC and Is Associated with Better Survival

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and Aims

The Hong Kong Liver Cancer (HKLC) system proposes to triage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients to more aggressive treatment and may be associated with superior survival compared with the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) system. We aimed to identify the influence of adherence to HKLC or BCLC treatment recommendations on survival and time to progression.

Methods

We examined a prospectively enrolled cohort of 292 patients undergoing 532 treatment episodes from a single clinical center.

Results

The BCLC and HKLC systems accurately predicted overall survival and time to progression after each treatment episode (BCLC: p < 0.001; HKLC: p < 0.001). Adherence to treatment recommendations was higher for HKLC than for BCLC (55.6 vs. 47.9%, p = 0.01). Survival was superior with adherence to HKLC recommendations compared to non-adherence (45.3 vs. 27.1 months, p < 0.001). There was no difference in survival in BCLC with adherence compared to non-adherence (34.6 vs. 32.3 months, p = 0.96). The survival benefit was limited to early- and very early stage disease for both HKLC (p < 0.001) and BCLC (p = 0.007). More patients were triaged to curative therapies by HKLC than BCLC (p = 0.004). The use of transarterial chemoembolization instead of ablation or resection in early- and very early stage disease for technical reasons was the major cause for non-recommended treatment and was associated with worse survival (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

These data support the use of HKLC in early- and very early stage HCC. Efforts should be made to overcome technical reasons for not performing ablation in early- and very early stage disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

HKLC:

Hong Kong Liver Cancer

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

BCLC:

Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer

AASLD:

American Association for the Study of Liver Disease

EASL:

European Association for the Study of the Liver

SCGH:

Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital

OLTx:

Orthotopic liver transplantation

TACE:

Transarterial chemoembolization

SIRT:

Selective internal radiotherapy

NAFLD/NASH:

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

HR:

Hazard ratio

95% CI:

95% confidence interval

References

  1. Bruix J, Sherman M. American Association for the Study of Liver Disease. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology. 2011;53:1020–1022.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. European Association For The Study Of The Liver. European Organisation For Research and Treatment of Cancer. EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2012;56:908–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Llovet JM, Bru C, Bruix J. Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: The BCLC staging classification. Semin Liver Dis. 1999;19:329–338.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bruix J, Reig M, Sherman M. Evidence-based diagnosis, staging, and treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:835–853.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cillo U, Vitale A, Grigoletto F, et al. Prospective validation of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system. J Hepatol. 2006;44:723–731.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Marrero JA, Fontana RJ, Barrat A, et al. Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: Comparison of 7 staging systems in an American cohort. Hepatology. 2005;41:707–716.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yau T, Tang VY, Yao TJ, Fan ST, Lo CM, Poon RT. Development of Hong Kong Liver Cancer staging system with treatment stratification for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:e1693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Adhoute X, Penaranda G, Bronowicki JP, Raoul JL. Usefulness of the HKLC vs. the BCLC staging system in a European HCC cohort. J Hepatol. 2015;62:492–493.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Adhoute X, Penaranda G, Raoul JL, Bourliere M. Staging of hepatocellular carcinoma: BCLC system, what else! Liver Int. 2016;36:1395–1396.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kolly P, Reeves H, Sangro B, Knopfli M, Candinas D, Dufour JF. Assessment of the Hong Kong Liver Cancer Staging System in Europe. Liver Int. 2016;36:911–917.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu L, Bartlett A, Plank L, McCall J. Validation of the Hong Kong liver cancer staging system in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with curative intent. J Hepatol. 2016;64:978–979.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yan X, Fu X, Cai C, Zi X, Yao H, Qiu Y. Validation of models in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of Hong Kong Liver Cancer with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system in a Chinese cohort. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;27:1180–1186.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim KM, Sinn DH, Jung SH, et al. The recommended treatment algorithms of the BCLC and HKLC staging systems: does following these always improve survival rates for HCC patients? Liver Int. 2016;36:1490–1497.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu PH, Hsu CY, Lee YH, et al. Hong Kong Liver Cancer staging system is associated with better performance for hepatocellular carcinoma: Special emphasis on viral etiology. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94:e1772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu PH, Hsu CY, Hsia CY, et al. Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: Assessment of eleven staging systems. J Hepatol. 2016;64:601–608.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Romagnoli R, Mazzaferro V, Bruix J. Reply. Hepatology. 2016;63:1054–1055.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Roayaie S, Jibara G, Tabrizian P, et al. The role of hepatic resection in the treatment of hepatocellular cancer. Hepatology. 2015;62:440–451.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Romagnoli R, Mazzaferro V, Bruix J. Surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: Moving from what can be done to what is worth doing. Hepatology. 2015;62:340–342.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang T, Lau WY, Zhang H, Wu MC, Shen F. Hepatic surgeons are like the child who rescued dying fishes. Hepatology. 2016;63:1054.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael C. Wallace.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 18 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wallace, M.C., Huang, Y., Preen, D.B. et al. HKLC Triages More Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients to Curative Therapies Compared to BCLC and Is Associated with Better Survival. Dig Dis Sci 62, 2182–2192 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-017-4622-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-017-4622-y

Keywords

Navigation