Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

ERCP: The Unresolved Question of Endotracheal Intubation

  • Review
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The anesthesia community is still divided as to the appropriate airway management in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Increasingly, gastroenterologists are comfortable with deep sedation (normally propofol) without endotracheal intubation. There are no comprehensive reviews addressing the various pros and cons of an un-intubated airway management. It is hoped that the present review will benefit both anesthesia providers and gastroenterologists. The reasons to avoid routine endotracheal intubation and the approaches for an un-intubated anesthetic management are discussed. The special situations where endotracheal intubation is the preferred approach are mentioned. Many special techniques to manage airway are illustrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goudra B, Singh P, Sinha A. Outpatient endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: safety and efficacy of anesthetic management with a natural airway in 653 consecutive procedures. Saudi J Anaesth. 2013;7:259.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Newland MC, Ellis SJ, Peters KR, et al. Dental injury associated with anesthesia: a report of 161,687 anesthetics given over 14 years. J Clin Anesth. 2007;19:339–345.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vogel J, Stübinger S, Kaufmann M, Krastl G, Filippi A. Dental injuries resulting from tracheal intubation—a retrospective study. Dent Traumatol. 2009;25:73–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yu H-D, Chou A-H, Yang M-W, Chang C-J. An analysis of perioperative eye injuries after nonocular surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwanica Off J Taiwan Soc Anesth. 2010;48:122–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sahin M, Anglade D, Buchberger M, Jankowski A, Albaladejo P, Ferretti GR. Case reports: Iatrogenic bronchial rupture following the use of endotracheal tube introducers. Can J Anaesth J Can Anesth. 2012;59:963–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dexter F, Epstein RH, Wachtel RE, Rosenberg H. Estimate of the relative risk of succinylcholine for triggering malignant hyperthermia. Anesth Analg. 2013;116:118–122.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hopkins PM. Malignant hyperthermia: pharmacology of triggering. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107:48–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tejada Artigas A, Bello Dronda S, Chacón Vallés E, et al. Risk factors for nosocomial pneumonia in critically ill trauma patients. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:304–309.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Berg H, Roed J, Viby-Mogensen J, et al. Residual neuromuscular block is a risk factor for postoperative pulmonary complications. A prospective, randomised, and blinded study of postoperative pulmonary complications after atracurium, vecuronium and pancuronium. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1997;41:1095–1103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Debaene B, Plaud B, Dilly M-P, Donati F. Residual paralysis in the PACU after a single intubating dose of nondepolarizing muscle relaxant with an intermediate duration of action. Anesthesiology. 2003;98:1042–1048.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Varposhti MR, Heidari SM, Safavi M, Honarmand A, Raeesi S. Postoperative residual block in postanesthesia care unit more than two hours after the administration of a single intubating dose of atracurium. J Res Med Sci Off J Isfahan Univ Med Sci. 2011;16:651–657.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sokół-Kobielska E. Sugammadex—indications and clinical use. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2013;45:106–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Raphael J, Rosenthal-Ganon T, Gozal Y. Emergency airway management with a laryngeal mask airway in a patient placed in the prone position. J Clin Anesth. 2004;16:560–561.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Goudra BG, Singh PM, Sinha AC. Anesthesia for ERCP: impact of anesthesiologist’s experience on outcome and cost. Anesth Res Pract. 2013;2013:570518.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Barnett SR, Berzin T, Sanaka S, Pleskow D, Sawhney M, Chuttani R. Deep sedation without intubation for ERCP is appropriate in healthier, non-obese patients. Dig Dis Sci. (Epub ahead of print). doi:10.1007/s10620-013-2783-x.

  16. Berzin TM, Sanaka S, Barnett SR, et al. A prospective assessment of sedation-related adverse events and patient and endoscopist satisfaction in ERCP with anesthesiologist-administered sedation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:710–717.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gambee AM, Hertzka RE, Fisher DM. Preoxygenation techniques: comparison of three minutes and four breaths. Anesth Analg. 1987;66:468–470.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Weaver J. The latest ASA mandate: CO2 monitoring for moderate and deep sedation. Anesth Prog. 2011;58:111–112.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Goudra BG. Comparison of acoustic respiration rate, impedance pneumography and capnometry monitors for respiration rate accuracy and apnea detection during GI endoscopy anesthesia. Open J Anesth. 2013;03:74–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cooper GS, Kou TD, Rex DK. Complications following colonoscopy with anesthesia assistance: a population-based analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:551–556.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ahlawat SK, Charabaty-Pishvaian A, Jackson PG, Haddad NG. Single-step EUS-guided pancreatic pseudocyst drainage using a large channel linear array echoendoscope and cystotome: results in 11 patients. JOP J Pancreas. 2006;7:616–624.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ahn JY, Seo DW, Eum J, et al. Single-step EUS-guided transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: analysis of technical feasibility, efficacy, and safety. Gut Liver. 2010;4:524–529.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mönkemüller KE, Harewood GC, Curioso WH, et al. Biochemical analysis of pancreatic fluid collections predicts bacterial infection. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;20:1667–1673.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Raksakietisak M. Unrecognised aspiration pneumonitis during enteroscopy: two cases report. J Med Assoc Thail Chotmaihet Thangphaet. 2009;92:869–871.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Abrishami A, Zilberman P, Chung F. Brief review: airway rescue with insertion of laryngeal mask airway devices with patients in the prone position. Can J Anaesth J Can Anesth. 2010;57:1014–1020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Osborn IP, Cohen J, Soper RJ, Roth LA. Laryngeal mask airway—a novel method of airway protection during ERCP: comparison with endotracheal intubation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:122–128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fabbri C, Luigiano C, Cennamo V, et al. The gastro-laryngeal tube for interventional endoscopic biliopancreatic procedures in anesthetized patients. Endoscopy. 2012;44:1051–1054.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Basavana Goudra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goudra, B., Singh, P.M. ERCP: The Unresolved Question of Endotracheal Intubation. Dig Dis Sci 59, 513–519 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-013-2931-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-013-2931-3

Keywords

Navigation