Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

United States Women Receive More Curative Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Than Men

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Previous database studies have found gender disparities favoring men in rates of liver transplantation, which resolve in cohorts examining only patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Aims

Our study aims to use two large, multicenter United States (US) databases to assess for gender disparity in HCC treatment regardless of transplant listing status.

Methods

We performed a retrospective database analysis of inpatient admission data from the University Health Consortium (UHC) and the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), over a 9- and 10-year period, respectively. Adults with a primary discharge diagnosis of HCC, identified using the International Classification of Diseases 9th Edition (ICD-9) code, were included. Series of univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to examine gender disparities in metastasis, liver decompensation, treatment type, and inpatient mortality after controlling for other possible predictors.

Results

We included 26,054 discharges from the NIS database and 25,671 patients from the UHC database in the analysis. Women with HCC appear to present less often with decompensated liver disease (OR = 0.79, p < 0.001). Furthermore they are more likely to receive invasive HCC treatment, with significantly higher rates of resection across race and diagnoses (OR = 1.34 and 1.44, p < 0.001). Univariate analyses show that US women have lower unadjusted rates of transplant; however, the disparity resolves after controlling for other clinical and demographic factors.

Conclusions

US women more often receive invasive treatment for HCC (especially resection) than US men with no observed disparity in transplantation rates when adjusted for pre-treatment variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:2893–2917.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. El-Serag HB. Hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1118–1127.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fattovich G, Stroffolini T, Zagni I, Donato F. Hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: Incidence and risk factors. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:S35–S50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. de Lope CR, Tremosini S, Forner A, Reig M, Bruix J. Management of HCC. J Hepatol. 2012;56:S75–S87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bruix J, Sherman M. Practice guidelines committee AeAftSoLD: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2005;42:1208–1236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bruix J, Sherman M. Diseases AAftSoL: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: An update. Hepatology. 2011;53:1020–1022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Forner A, Reig ME, de Lope CR, Bruix J. Current strategy for staging and treatment: The BCLC update and future prospects. Semin Liver Dis. 2010;30:61–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Moylan CA, Brady CW, Johnson JL, Smith AD, Tuttle-Newhall JE, Muir AJ. Disparities in liver transplantation before and after introduction of the MELD score. JAMA. 2008;300:2371–2378.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. University Health Consortium, (HCUP) HCaUP: National inpatient sample. http://www.uhc.edu. Accessed 5 September 2011.

  10. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) HCaUP. National Inpatient Sample. http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/nisoverview.jsp. Accessed 4 September 2011.

  11. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–383.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:613–619.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shavers VL, Harlan LC, Stevens JL. Racial/ethnic variation in clinical presentation, treatment, and survival among breast cancer patients under age 35. Cancer. 2003;97:134–147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Simons JP, Ng SC, Hill JS, Shah SA, Zhou Z, Tseng JF. In-hospital mortality from liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: A simple risk score. Cancer. 2010;116:1733–1738.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Singal AG, Chan V, Getachew Y, Guerrero R, Reisch JS, Cuthbert JA. Predictors of liver transplant eligibility for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in a safety net hospital. Dig Dis Sci. 2012;57:580–586.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dohmen K, Shigematsu H, Irie K, Ishibashi H. Longer survival in female than male with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;18:267–272.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kalra M, Mayes J, Assefa S, Kaul AK, Kaul R. Role of sex steroid receptors in pathobiology of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:5945–5961.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mindikoglu AL, Regev A, Seliger SL, Magder LS. Gender disparity in liver transplant waiting-list mortality: The importance of kidney function. Liver Transpl. 2010;16:1147–1157.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cholongitas E, Marelli L, Kerry A, et al. Female liver transplant recipients with the same GFR as male recipients have lower MELD scores—a systematic bias. Am J Transplant. 2007;7:685–692.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Myers RP, Shaheen AA, Aspinall AI, Quinn RR, Burak KW. Gender, renal function, and outcomes on the liver transplant waiting list: Assessment of revised MELD including estimated glomerular filtration rate. J Hepatol. 2011;54:462–470.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Farinati F, Sergio A, Giacomin A, et al. Is female sex a significant favorable prognostic factor in hepatocellular carcinoma? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;21:1212–1218.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie Cauble.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 5 and 6; Fig. 2.

Table 5 Multinomial regression analysis predicting receiving resection versus non-invasive using nationwide inpatient sample (NIS) database
Table 6 Multinomial regression analysis predicting receiving resection versus non-invasive using university health consortium (UHC) database
Fig. 2
figure 2

Resection rate by sex and discharge year

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cauble, S., Abbas, A., Balart, L. et al. United States Women Receive More Curative Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Than Men. Dig Dis Sci 58, 2817–2825 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-013-2731-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-013-2731-9

Keywords

Navigation