Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Improved Post-Transplant Survival in the United States for Patients with Cholangiocarcinoma After 2000

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The incidence of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) continues to rise. Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) can be used for selected patients with localized but unresectable hilar CCA. Although initial post-OLT survival rates were poor, outcomes after introduction of the Mayo Clinic protocol have been more promising and there has been increased interest in OLT for CCA nationally.

Aims

The aim of this study is to determine post-transplant survival and prognostic factors for patients undergoing OLT for CCA.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of all patients with CCA listed nationwide for OLT between October 1987 and May 2008 was performed using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using log-rank test.

Results

Of 595 patients with CCA listed for OLT, 359 (60.3 %) underwent OLT. Median age at OLT was 49 years, 66 % were male and 91 % were Caucasian. The median follow-up time was 2 years. There has been an increasing number of liver transplants performed for CCA since 2000. The 1- and 5-year probability of survival was 85.8 and 51.4 %, respectively. On multivariate analysis, significant prognostic factors for decreased post-OLT survival included transplant before 2000 (HR 11.25, 95 % CI 1.28–98.7) and acute cellular rejection (HR 5.64, 95 % CI 1.14–27.8).

Conclusions

Survival after transplant for CCA has improved over time, and OLT is being used more frequently in the treatment of CCA. Significant predictors of post-OLT survival include a history of acute rejection and date of transplant in relation to the publication of Mayo protocol results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shaib Y, El-Serag HB. The epidemiology of cholangiocarcinoma. Semin Liver Dis. 2004;24:115–125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shaib YH, Davila JA, McGlynn K, El-Serag HB. Rising incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States: a true increase? J Hepatol. 2004;40:472–477.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Taylor-Robinson SD, Toledano MB, Arora S, et al. Increase in mortality rates from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in England and Wales 1968–1998. Gut. 2001;48:816–820.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Broome U, Olsson R, Loof L, et al. Natural history and prognostic factors in 305 Swedish patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gut. 1996;38:610–615.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Singal AG, Rakoski MO, Salgia RJ, et al. The clinical presentation and prognostic factors for intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in a tertiary care centre. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;31:625–633.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ahrendt SA, Cameron JL, Pitt HA. Current management of patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Adv Surg. 1996;30:427–452.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Madariaga JR, Iwatsuki S, Todo S, Lee RG, Irish W, Starzl TE. Liver resection for hilar and peripheral cholangiocarcinomas: a study of 62 cases. Ann Surg. 1998;227:70–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Malhi H, Gores GJ. Review article: the modern diagnosis and therapy of cholangiocarcinoma. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;23:1287–1296.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Guthrie CM, Haddock G, De Beaux AC, Garden OJ, Carter DC. Changing trends in the management of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 1993;80:1434–1439.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bismuth H, Nakache R, Diamond T. Management strategies in resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 1992;215:31–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tan JC, Coburn NG, Baxter NN, Kiss A, Law CH. Surgical management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma—a population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:600–608.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Grossman EJ, Millis JM. Liver transplantation for non-hepatocellular carcinoma malignancy: indications, limitations, and analysis of the current literature. Liver Transpl. 2010;16:930–942.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Castaldo ET, Pinson CW. Liver transplantation for non-hepatocellular carcinoma malignancy. HPB (Oxf). 2007;9:98–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Penn I. Hepatic transplantation for primary and metastatic cancers of the liver. Surgery. 1991;110:726–735.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Singal A, Welling TH, Marrero JA. Role of liver transplantation in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2009;9:491–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. De Vreede I, Steers JL, Burch PA, et al. Prolonged disease-free survival after orthotopic liver transplantation plus adjuvant chemoirradiation for cholangiocarcinoma. Liver Transpl. 2000;6:309–316.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gores GJ, Heimbach JK, Rosen CB. Liver transplantation for non-hepatocellular carcinoma malignancies. Liver Transpl. 2010;16:S22–S25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Murad D, Kim WR, Harnois DM, et al. Effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiation, followed by liver transplantation, for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma at 12 US centers. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:88–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Meyer CG, Penn I, James L. Liver transplantation for cholangiocarcinoma: results in 207 patients. Transplantation. 2000;69:1633–1637.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Becker NS, Rodriguez JA, Barshes NR, O’Mahony CA, Goss JA, Aloia TA. Outcomes analysis for 280 patients with cholangiocarcinoma treated with liver transplantation over an 18-year period. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:117–122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Heimbach JK, Gores GJ, Haddock MG, et al. Predictors of disease recurrence following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and liver transplantation for unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Transplantation. 2006;82:1703–1707.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The data reported here have been supplied by the Arbor Research Collaborative for Health (Arbor Research) as the contractor for the SRTR. The interpretation and reporting of these data are the responsibility of the author(s) and in no way should be seen as an official policy of or interpretation by the SRTR or the US Government. The authors have no grant support to report for this study.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reena J. Salgia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Salgia, R.J., Singal, A.G., Fu, S. et al. Improved Post-Transplant Survival in the United States for Patients with Cholangiocarcinoma After 2000. Dig Dis Sci 59, 1048–1054 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-013-2626-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-013-2626-9

Keywords

Navigation