Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Capsule Endoscopy for Obscure GI Bleeding: Therapeutic Yield of Follow-up Procedures

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Positive findings on capsule endoscopy (CE) often prompt a follow-up procedure with therapeutic intent. Our purpose was to review the therapeutic yield of subsequent procedural interventions based on positive CE findings. The medical records of all patients who underwent CE between June 2002 and February 2005 for obscure bleeding were retrospectively reviewed. Fifty-two patients had follow-up procedures based on positive capsule findings. In this group, angiodysplasia was the most common CE finding (n=30), with therapeutic intervention performed in 16 cases (53%). Fresh blood without clear lesion was the second most common finding (n=9), with therapeutic intervention performed in 6 cases (67%). Overall, a therapeutic intervention was performed in 33 of the 52 follow-up procedures (63%). Positive capsule findings directed further procedural investigation in 52 cases, with a high therapeutic yield of 63% in those cases. The long-term efficacy of such interventions warrants further investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zuckerman GR, Prakash C, Askin MP, Lewis BS (2000) AGA technical review on the evaluation and management of occult and obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastroenterology 118:201–221

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lewis BS, Swain P (2002) Capsule endoscopy in the evaluation of patients with suspected small intestine bleeding: results of a pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc 56:349–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Scapa E, Jacob H, Lewcowicz S, Migdal M, Gat D, Gluckhovski A, Gutmann N, Fireman Z (2002) Initial experience of wireless-capsule endoscopy for evaluating occult gastrointestinal bleeding and suspected small bowel pathology. Am J Gastointestinal 97:2776–2779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Maieron A, Hubner D, Blaha B, Deutsch C, Schickmair T, Ziachehabi A, Kerstan E, Knoflach P, Schoefl R (2004) Multicenter retrospective evaluation of capsule endoscopy in clinical routine. Endoscopy 36:864–868

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Enns R, Go K, Chang H, Pluta K (2004) Capsule endoscopy: a single-centre experience with the first 226 capsules. Can J Gastroenterol 18:555–558

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Saurin JC, Delvaux M, Gaudin JL, Fassler I, Villarejo J, Vahedi K, Bitoun A, Canard JM, Souquet JC, Ponchon T, Florent C, Gay G (2003) Diagnostic value of endoscopic capsule in patients with obscure digestive bleeding: blinded comparison with video push enteroscopy. Endoscopy 35:576–584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mata A, Bordas JM, Feu F, Gines A, Pellise M, Fernandez Esparrach G, Balaguer F, Pique JM, Liach J (2004) Wireless capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: a comparison study with push enteroscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 20:189–194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pennazio M, Santucci R, Rondonotti E, Abbiati C, Beccari G, Rossini FP, DeFranchis R (2004) Outcomes of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding after capsule endoscopy: report of 100 consecutive cases. Gastroenterology 126:643–653

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rastogi A, Schoen RE, Slivka A (2004) Diagnostic yield and clinical outcomes of capsule endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 60:959–964

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Iddan G, Meron G, Glukhovsky A, Swain P (2000) Wireless capsule endoscopy. Nature 415:417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chak A, Koehler MK, Sundaram SN, Cooper GS, Canto MI, Sivak MV Jr (1998) Diagnostic and therapeutic impact of push enteroscopy: analysis of factors associated with positive findings. Gastrointest Endosc 47:18–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Selby W (2004) Can clinical features predict the likelihood of finding abnormalities when using capsule endoscopy in patients with GI bleeding of obscure origin? Gastrointest Endosc 59:782–787

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Graham DY, Opekun AR, Willingham FF, Qureshi WA (2005) Visible small bowel mucosal injury in chronic NSAID users. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 3:55–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Goldstein JL, Eisen GM, Lewis B, Gralnek IM, Zlotnick S, Fort JG (2005) Video capsule endoscopy to prospectively assess small bowel injury with celecoxib, naproxen plus omeprazole, and placebo. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 3:133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew M. Baichi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baichi, M.M., Arifuddin, R.M. & Mantry, P.S. Capsule Endoscopy for Obscure GI Bleeding: Therapeutic Yield of Follow-up Procedures. Dig Dis Sci 52, 1370–1375 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-006-9542-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-006-9542-1

Keywords

Navigation