Skip to main content
Log in

Capsule Endoscopy Examination—Preliminary Review by a Nurse

  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Capsule endoscopy (CE) has been recommended as the method of choice for diagnostic endoscopy of the small bowel. An experienced nurse, after proper training, may contribute to the endoscopy procedures as previously described for sigmoidoscopy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of an experienced gastroenterology nurse to prepare CE records for physician interpretation, by detecting abnormal thumbnails. A prospective, observational design was used. Fifty CE videos were preread by a specially trained gastroenterology nurse who thumbnailed the abnormalities detected for interpretation by the gastroenterologist. The nurse's description of the lesions and the calculated gastric and bowel transit times were compared to the interpretation of the videos made directly by the gastroenterologist (gold standard). The primary end point of the study was the quality of the nurse's pathology findings; the secondary end point was the cost effectiveness of this practice. There was complete agreement between the nurse and gastroenterologist for all 12 cases interpreted as normal by the gastroenterologist. In the remaining 38 cases, the nurse created 130 thumbnail selections and the physician, 99. Complete interobserver agreement was achieved for 93 of the 96 lesions categorized as “significant" by the physician (96.9%). After all relevant variables were taken into account, this approach saved $324 per CE examination. The use of nurse practitioner to preread CE videos and prepare thumbnail selections for further assessment by the gastroenterologist appears to be safe, reliable, and cost effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Costamagna G, Shah SK, Riccioni ME, et al.: A prospective trial comparing small bowel radiographs and video capsule endoscopy for suspected small bowel disease. Gastroenterology 123:999–1005, 2002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goldgarb NI, Philips A, Conn M, Lewis BS, Nash DB: Economic and health outcomes of capsule endoscopy: Opportunities for improved management of the diagnostic process for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Disease Management 3:123–135, 2002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Saurin JC, Delvaux M, Gaudin JL, et al.: Diagnostic value of endoscopic capsule in patients with obscure digestive bleeding: Blinded comparison with video push-enteroscopy. Endoscopy 35:576–584, 2003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Appleyard M, Fireman Z, Glukhovsky A, et al.: A randomized trial comparing wireless capsule endoscopy with push enteroscopy for the detection of small-bowel lesions. Gastroenterology 119:1431–1438, 2001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bour B, Person B, Cales P, et al.: Interobserver agreement on endoscopic diagnosis of bleeding peptic ulcers. Gastrointest Endosc 46:27–32, 1997

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kusano M, Ino K, Yamada T, et al.: Interobserver and intraobserver variation in endoscopic assessment of GERD using the “Los Angeles” classification. Gastrointest Endosc 49:700–704, 1999

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Smedh K, Olaison G, Jonsson KA, Johansson KE, Skullman S, Hallbook O: Interobserver variation of colonoileoscopic findings in Crohn's disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 30:81–86, 1995

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Armstrong D, Bennett JR, Blum AL, et al.: The endoscopic assessment of esophagitis: A progress report on observer agreement. Gastroenterology 111:85–92, 1996

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wallner B, Sylvan A, Janunger KGL: Endoscopic assessment of the "Z-line" (squamocolumnar junction) appearance: Reproducibility of the ZAP classification among endoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc 55:65–69, 2002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shapero TF, Alexander PE, Hoover J, Burgis E, Schabas R: Colorectal cancer screening: Video-reviewed flexible sigmoidoscopy by nurse endoscopists–A Canadian community-based perspective. Can J Gastroenterol 15:441–445, 2001

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Goodfellow PB, Fretwell IA, Simms JM: Nurse endoscopy in a district general hospital. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 85:181–184, 2003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Levinthal GN, Burke CA, Santisi JM: The accuracy of an endoscopy nurse in interpreting capsule endoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 98:2669–2671, 2003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schoenfeld P, Lipscomb S, Crook J, et al.: Accuracy of polyp detection by gastroenterologists and nurse endoscopists during flexible sigmoidoscopy: A randomized trial. Gastroenterology 117:312–318, 1999

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lewis BS, Swain P: Capsule endoscopy in the evaluation of patients with suspected small intestinal bleeding: Results of a pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc 56:349–353, 2002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wilson D: Nurse practitioners: The early years (1965–1974). Nurse Pract 19:26–28, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  16. Froerer R: The nurse endoscopist: Reality or fiction? Gastroenterol Nurs 21:15–20, 1998

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sprout J: Nurse endoscopist training: The next step. Gastroenterol Nurs 23:111–115, 2000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yaron Niv MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Niv, Y., Niv, G. Capsule Endoscopy Examination—Preliminary Review by a Nurse. Dig Dis Sci 50, 2121–2124 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-005-3017-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-005-3017-7

Keywords

Navigation