Abstract
As part of a larger initiative to promote active learning at Case Western Reserve University, three faculty members (one field and two academic) participated in a year-long fellowship focusing on active instruction and academic technologies. The use of interactive technology and technology-based peer-to-peer active learning was considered a natural fit to the teaching of social work clinical practice skills; these techniques were designed to recognize students’ diverse learning styles and to promote hands-on application of practice skills in classroom and field settings. The following innovations were implemented. First, a foundation methods practice course was “flipped”—students viewed online lectures and instructional videos at their own pace prior to class, allowing classroom time to be reserved for collaborative work and case study exercises designed to engage students and deepen their understanding. Second, the Google Application Suite was used in both foundation and advanced masters courses to (a) help bridge the gap between field and classroom through case study dialogues with community practitioners using Google Hangouts video conferencing capability, (b) create an online and in-class learning community using Google+, and (c) promote student collaboration using Google Drive, Documents and Presentation. Third, the integration of newly designed interactive classroom learning spaces and collaborative technology was used to promote a pedagogical shift toward active learning. Implementation and evaluation of these approaches to teaching social work practice are presented.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abell, M. L., & Galinsky, M. J. (2002). Introducing students to computer-based group work practice. Journal of Social Work Education, 38(1), 39–54. doi:10.1080/10437797.2002.10779081.
Allwardt, D. E. (2011). Writing with wikis: A cautionary tale of technology in the classroom. Journal of Social Work Education, 47(3), 597–607. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2011.200900126.
Bishop, J. L. & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom : A survey of the research. Paper presented at 120th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 23–26 June. American Society for Engineering Education, Atlanta.
Bogo, M. (2010). Achieving competence in social work through field education. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Coe Regan, J. R., & Freddolino, P. (2008). Integrating technology into the social work curriculum. Alexandria: CSWE Press.
Day, J. A., & Foley, J. D. (2006). Evaluating a web lecture intervention in a human computer interaction course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 49(4), 420–431. doi:10.1109/TE.2006.879792.
Dedman, D. E., & Palmer, L. (2011). Field instructors and online training: An exploratory survey. Journal of Social Work Education, 47(1), 151–161. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2011.200900057.
Dunn, J. (2011). The evolution of classroom technology. Edudemic: Connecting Education and Technology. http://www.edudemic.com/classroom-technology/. Accessed 28 March 2014.
Flumerfelt, S., & Green, G. (2013). Using lean in the flipped classroom for at risk students. Educational Technology and Society, 16(1), 356–366.
Frey, A., Faul, A., & Yankelov, P. (2003). Student perceptions of web-assisted teaching strategies. Journal of Social Work Education, 39(3), 443–457. doi:10.1080/10437797.2003.10779148.
Jamaludin, R., & Osman, S. Z. (2014). The use of a flipped classroom to enhance engagement and promote active learning. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(2), 124–131.
Juergensen, J., Oestreich, T., Yuhnke, B., Kenney, M., Skapin, K. & Shapiro, W. (2015). Creating a culture of active learning and collaboration: Case Western Reserve University’s year one report. Educause Review, 50(1).
Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30–43.
Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Kereluik, K. (2009). Looking back to the future of educational technology. TechTrends, 53(5), 49.
Reiser, R. A. (2001). A history of instructional design and technology: Part I: A history of instructional media. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(1), 53–64. doi:10.1007/BF02504506.
Schreiner, L. A., & Louis, M. C. (2011). The Engaged Learning Index: Implications for faculty development. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 22(1), 5–28.
Wolfson, G. K., Marsom, G., & Magnuson, C. W. (2005). Changing the nature of the discourse: Teaching field seminars online. Journal of Social Work Education, 41, 355–361. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2005.200300346.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Holmes, M.R., Tracy, E.M., Painter, L.L. et al. Moving from Flipcharts to the Flipped Classroom: Using Technology Driven Teaching Methods to Promote Active Learning in Foundation and Advanced Masters Social Work Courses. Clin Soc Work J 43, 215–224 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-015-0521-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-015-0521-x