Skip to main content
Log in

The Value of Hate in the Countertransference

  • Practice/Theory Relationship
  • Published:
Clinical Social Work Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

ABSTRACT

The author looks at the experience of hate in the countertransference and develops the idea that hate can be of particular value to the treatment process. He begins with an exploration of the therapist’s needs and discusses how unmet self-regulatory needs sometimes lead to feelings of frustration and rage toward the patient. The author explores these ideas as they are connected to Winnicott’s (1949, 1971) work on aggression and Jessica Benjamin’s (1992) work on recognition and destruction. The author espouses a difference between rage and hate, where rage is seen as indicative of unmet needs, and hate is seen as a force that can emancipate the therapist from the encumbrance of unmet needs. Case examples are provided to show the utility of this perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bacal H. A., Thomson P. G., (1996). The analyst’s selfobject needs and the effect of their frustration on the treatment: A new view of countertransference. In Goldberg A., (ed.), Progress in self psychology Vol. 12. Guilford New York pp. 202–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin J., (1992). Recognition and destruction: An outline of intersubjectivity. In Skolnick N. J., Warshaw S. C., (eds.), Relational perspectives in psychoanalysis The Analytic Press Hillsdale NJ, pp. 43–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Beebe B., Lachmann F., (1988). Mother–infant mutual influence and precursors of psychic structure. In Goldberg A., (ed.), Frontiers in self psychology: Progress in self psychology Vol. 3. The Analytic Press Hillsdale, NJ pp. 3–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Bion, W. R. (1962). Learning from Experience. London: Heinemann

  • Brandchaft, B. (1994). Structures of pathological accommodation and change in psychoanalysis. Presented at the Association for Psychoanalytic Self Psychology, New York City, March 10

  • Buie D., (1982). The abandoned therapist International Journal of Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy 9: 227–231

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein L., (1987). The problem of the bad analyst feeling Modern Psychoanalysis 12: 35–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferenczi S., (1988). The clinical diary of Sandor Ferenczi, In Dupont J., ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonagy P., Gergely G., Jurist E., Target M., (2002). Mentalization and affect regulation and the development of the self Other Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut H., (1978). Thoughts on narcissism and narcissistic rage. In Ornstein P., Ornstein A., (eds.), The search for the self. International Universities Press, New York pp. 615–659

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahler M. S., Pine F., Bergman A., (1975). The psychological birth of the human infant Basic Books New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell S., (1993). Hope and dread in psychoanalysis. Basic Books New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Renik O., (1993). Analytic interaction: Conceptualizing technique in light of the analyst’s irreducible subjectivity Psychoanalytic Quarterly 62: 553–571

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodman R. F., (1987). The spontaneous gesture: The selected letters of D.W. Winnicott. Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Searles, H. (1975). The patient as therapist to his analyst. In H. Searles (ed.), Countertransference and related subjects (pp. 380–459). New York: International Universities Press, 1979

  • Slochower J., (1996). Holding and psychoanalysis: A relational perspective. The Analytic Press Hillsdale NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolorow R., Brandchaft B., Atwood G., (1987). Psychoanalytic treatment: An intersubjective approach Analytic Press Hillside, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Symington N., (1983). The analyst’s act of freedom as agent of therapeutic change International Journal of Psychoanalysis 10: 783–792

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott D. W., (1949). Hate in the countertransference International Journal of Psychoanalysis 30: 69–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott D. W. (1960). Ego distortions in terms of true and false self. In The maturational processes and the facilitating environment: Studies in the theory of emotional development (pp. 140–152). New York: International University Press, 1965

  • Winnicott D. W. (1971). The use of an object and relating through identifications. In: playing and reality. New York: Basic Books

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurence Bennett Green M.S.W., Psy.D..

Additional information

Laurence Green, M.S.W., Psy.D. is on the faculty and a member of the Institute of Contemporary Psychoanalysis. He is Co-chair of the History Committee of the International Federation of Psychoanalytic Education. He is in private practice in Los Angeles, California working with children, adolescents and adults.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Green , L. The Value of Hate in the Countertransference. Clin Soc Work J 34, 187–199 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-005-0008-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-005-0008-2

Keywords

Navigation