Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

How Contemporary Rehabilitation Fails Youth and Sabotages the American Juvenile Justice System: A Critique and Call for Change

  • Published:
Critical Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Long a cornerstone of the American juvenile justice system, the idea that youth can change, and merit chances to do so, has enjoyed new life after decades of punitive erosion. Unfortunately, the rehabilitation offered to youth is largely shortsighted and inadequate. In this article, I argue that the juvenile justice system embraces a “myopic model” of rehabilitation that loses touch with the social roots of youth problems and focuses too heavily on improving internal thoughts and behaviors through short-term “pills and programs” (Goshe 2019). By losing sight of the societal harms at the root of delinquent behaviors, the myopic model advances a limited and ultimately unsustainable model of change. In contrast, this article contends that robust rehabilitation treats the social and the personal as crucial to the rehabilitative equation and offers a pathway to meaningful change for youth and the juvenile justice system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abram, K., Teplin, L., King, D., Longworth, S., Emanuel, K., Romero, E., et al. (2013). PTSD, trauma, and comorbid psychiatric disorders in detained youth. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, US Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anda, R., Butchart, A., Felitti, V., & Brown, D. (2010). Building a framework for global surveillance of the public health implications of adverse childhood experiences. American Journal of Preventive Medicine,39(1), 93–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D., & Bonta, J. (1998). The psychology of criminal conduct (2nd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D., & Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). New Providence, NJ: Matthew Bender & Company Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annie E. Casey Foundation. (2013). Youth incarceration in the United States. Baltimore, MD: Annie E. Casey Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annie E. Casey Foundation. (2014). 2014 Juvenile detention alternatives initiative report. Baltimore, MD. Retrieved December 12, 2018, from https://www.aecf.org/resources/2014-juvenile-detention-alternatives-initiative-progress-report/.

  • Aos, S., Miller, M., & Drake, E. (2006). Evidence-based public policy options to reduce future prison construction, criminal justice costs, and crime rates. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baglivio, M., Epps, N., Swartz, K., Sayedul Huq, M., Sheer, A., & Hardt, N. S. (2014). The prevalence of adverse childhood experiences (ACE) in the lives of juvenile offenders. Journal of Juvenile Justice,3(2), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blueprints for Healthy Youth Development. (2014). Blueprints Programs. University of Colorado Boulder, Institute of Behavioral Science. Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence.

  • Britton, L. (2016). Limiting psychotropic medication and improving treatment for children in custody. American Bar Association. Retrieved December 8, 2018, from https://www.americanbar.org/groups/child_law/resources/child_law_practiceonline/child_law_practice/vol-35/april-2016/limiting-psychotropic-medication-and-improving-mental-health-tre/.

  • Carlen, P. (1984). Justice: Too important to be left to the judiciary. Abolitionist,16(4), 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014). The social-ecology model: A framework for prevention. Retrieved December 8, 2018, from http://www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/overview/social-ecologicalmodel.html.

  • Children’s Defense Fund. (2017). The state of America’s children. Retrieved December 10, 2018, from https://www.childrensdefense.org/reports/2017/the-state-of-americas-children-2017-report/.

  • Clark, P. (2010). Preventing crime with cognitive behavioral therapy. National Institute of Justice. Retrieved December 10, 2018, from https://www.nij.gov/journals/265/pages/therapy.aspx#note4.

  • Cognitive Centre of Canada. (2018). Reasoning and rehabilitation: Program components. Retrieved December 10, 2018, from http://www.cognitivecentre.ca/programcomp.

  • Cohen, J., Mannarino, A., Berliner, L., & Deblinger, E. (2000). Trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy for children and adolescents: An empirical update. Journal of Interpersonal Violence,15(11), 1202–1224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F. (2006). It’s time to reaffirm rehabilitation. Crime and Public Policy,5(4), 665–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F., Cullen, J., & Wozniak, J. (1988). Is rehabilitation dead? The myth of the punitive public. Journal of Criminal Justice,16, 303–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F., Fisher, B., & Applegate, B. (2000). Public opinion about punishment and corrections. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 27, pp. 1–79). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F., & Gendreau, P. (2000). Assessing correctional rehabilitation: Policy, practice, and prospects. In J. Horney (Ed.), Criminal justice: vol. 3, policies, processes, and decisions of the criminal justice system. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F., & Gendreau, P. (2001). From nothing works to what works: Changing professional ideology in the 21st century. The Prison Journal,81(3), 313–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F., & Gilbert, K. (1982). Reaffirming rehabilitation. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, E. (2013). Crime and punishment in America. Revised and updated edition. New York: Metropolitan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D., & Welsh, B. (2007). Saving children from a life of crime: Early risk factors and effective interventions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felitti, F., Anda, V., Nordenberg, R., Williamson, P., Spitz, D., Edwards, A., et al. (1998). Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: The adverse childhood experiences (ACE) study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine,14(4), 245–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feucht, T., & Holt, T. (2016). Does cognitive behavioral therapy work in criminal justice? A new analysis from crimesolutions.gov. National Institute of Justice. Retrieved December 10, 2018, from https://nij.gov/journals/277/Pages/crimesolutions-cbt.aspx.

  • Finkelhor D., Turner, H., Hamby, S., & Ormrod, R. (2011). Polyvictimization: Children’s exposure to multiple types of violence, crime, and abuse. National Survey of Children’s Exposure to Violence. Retrieved December 10, 2018, from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/235504.pdf.

  • Ford, J., Chapman, J., Connor, D., & Cruise, K. (2012). Complex trauma and aggression in secure juvenile justice settings. Criminal Justice and Behavior,39(6), 694–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland, D. (1985). Punishment and welfare: A history of penal strategies. Aldershot: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gately, G. (2015). Federal juvenile justice funding declines precipitously. Retrieved December 8, 2018, from https://jjie.org/2015/02/12/federal-juvenile-justice-funding-declines-precipitously/.

  • Gettis, V. (2000). The juvenile court and the progressives. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, T., & Myers, R. R. (2011). Democracy and demonstration in the gray area of neo-liberalism: A case study of Free Los Angeles High School. The British Journal of Criminology,51(4), 652–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, T., & Myers, R. R. (2013). Youth justice innovation on the west coast: Examining community-based social justice organizations through a Left Realist lens. Western Criminology Review,14(1), 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, T., & Myers, R. R. (2017). Against evidenced based oppression: Marginalized youth and the politics of risk-based assessment and intervention. Theoretical Criminology,21(2), 151–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, A., & Glick, B. (1994). Aggression replacement training: Curriculum and evaluation. Simulation and Gaming,25(1), 9–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goshe, S. (2015). Lost causes and social injustice: Going beyond the dominant paradigms of juvenile justice policy. PhD Thesis, University of California, Irvine.

  • Goshe, S. (2019). What’s wrong with American criminal justice reform? In W. S. DeKeseredy & E. Currie (Eds.), Progressive justice in an age of repression: Strategies for challenging the rise of the right (pp. 181–226). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, P., Welsh, B., & Rocque, M. (2012). Implementing proven programs for juvenile offenders: Assessing state progress. Association for the Advancement of Evidence Based Practice

  • Grisso, T. (2008). Adolescent offenders with mental disorders. Future of Children,18(2), 143–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines, K., & Case, S. (2008). The rhetoric and reality of the ‘risk factor prevention paradigm’ approach to preventing and reducing youth offending. Youth Justice,8(1), 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, J. D., & Catalano, R. (1992). Communities that care: Action for drug abuse prevention. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henggeler, S. (2011). Efficacy studies to large-scale transport: The development and validation of multisystemic therapy programs. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology,7, 351–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley, CA: California University Press.

  • Institute for Policy Studies. (2016). Ohio proves it: Rehabilitation works. Retrieved December 8, 2018, from https://ips-dc.org/ohio-proves-rehabilitation-works/.

  • Homeboy Industries. (2018). Homeboy Industries: Why we do it. Juvenile. Retrieved December 10, 2018, from https://www.homeboyindustries.org/why-we-do-it/.

  • Justice Information Exchange. (2018). Re-entry issues. Retrieved July 25, 2018, from https://jjie.org/hub/reentry/key-issues/#_edn4.

  • Kazemian, L., & Maruna, S. (2009). Desistance from crime. In M. D. Krohn, A. J. Lizotte, & P. G. Hall (Eds.), Handbook on crime and deviance (pp. 277–296). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C., Losen, D., & Hewitt, D. (2010). The school to prison pipeline. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krisberg, B. (2005). Juvenile justice: Redeeming our children. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latessa, E., Lovins, B., & Ostrowski, K. (2009). The Ohio youth assessment system: Final report. Center for Criminal Justice Research. Retrieved December 12, 2018, from https://www.uc.edu/content/dam/uc/ccjr/docs/reports/project_reports/OYAS_final_report.pdf.

  • Lewis, S. (2005). Rehabilitation: Headline or footnote in the new penal policy? Probation Journal,52(2), 119–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M. (1999). Can intervention rehabilitate serious delinquents? Annals of the American Association of Political and Social Science,564(1), 142–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M. (2009). The primary factors that characterize effective interventions with juvenile offenders: A meta-analytic overview. Victims & Offenders,4(2), 124–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M., Howell, J., Kelly, M., Gabrielle Chapman, G., & Carver, D. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of juvenile justice programs. Washington, DC: Center for Juvenile Justice Reform.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, C. L., Wasserman, G. A., Olfson, M., McReynolds, L. S., Musabegovic, H., & Keating, J. M. (2013). Psychotropic medication patterns among youth in juvenile justice. Admin Policy Mental Health,40(2), 58–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D. (2006). What works in corrections: Reducing the criminal activities of offenders and delinquents. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maruna, S. (2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matza, D. (1964). Delinquency and drift. Canada: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McArthur Foundation. (2018). Evaluation of the models for change initiative. Retrieved December 8, 2018, from https://www.macfound.org/press/grantee-publications/evaluation-models-change-initiative/.

  • McNeill, F. (2012). Four forms of ‘offender’ rehabilitation: Towards an interdisciplinary perspective. Legal and Criminological Psychology,17(1), 18–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendel, R. (2015). Maltreatment of youth in U.S. juvenile corrections facilities. Baltimore, MD: Annie E. Casey Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milkman, H., & Wanberg, K. (2007). Cognitive- behavioral treatment: A review and discussion for correction professionals. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mojtabai, R., & Olfson, M. (2010). National trends in psychotropic medication polypharmacy in office-based psychiatry. Archives of General Psychiatry,67(1), 26–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, R. (2013). The biographical and psychic consequences of ‘welfare inaction’ for young women in trouble with the law. Youth Justice,13(3), 218–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Corrections. (2018). Thinking for a change 4.0. foreward. Retrieved December 12, 2018, from https://info.nicic.gov/t4c40/node/128.

  • National Research Council. (2013). Reforming juvenile justice: A developmental approach. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/14685.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. (2006). Federal Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice Annual Report. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. (2013). Model programs guide. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs.

  • Petrosino, A., Turpin-Petrosino, C., & Guckenburg, S. (2010). Formal system processing of juveniles: Effects on delinquency. Campbell Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2010.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phoenix, J., & Kelly, L. (2013). ‘You have to do it for yourself’: Responsibilization in youth justice and young people’s situated knowledge of youth justice practice. The British Journal of Criminology,53(3), 419–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polaschek, D. (2012). An appraisal of the risk-need-responsivity (RNR) model of offender rehabilitation and its application in correctional treatment. Legal and Criminological Psychology,17(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raynor, P., & Robinson, G. (2005). Rehabilitation, crime and justice. Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raynor, P., & Robinson, G. (2009). Why help offenders? Arguments for rehabilitation as a penal strategy. European Journal of Probation,1(1), 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, G., & Crow, I. (2009). Offender rehabilitation: Theory, research and practice. Los Angeles: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotman, E. (1990). Beyond punishment: A new view on the rehabilitation of criminal offenders. New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryerson, E. (1978). The best-laid plans: America’s juvenile court experiment. New York: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R., & Laub, J. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R., & Laub, J. (2005). A life-course view of the development of crime. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,602, 12–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shufelt, J., & Cocozza, J. (2006). Youth with mental health disorders in the juvenile justice system: Results from a multi-state, multi-system prevalence study. Delmar, NY: National Center for Mental Health and Juvenile Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornberry, T., & Krohn, M. (2003). Taking stock of delinquency: an overview of findings from contemporary longitudinal studies. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong, J., & Farrington, D. (2006). How effective is the “reasoning and rehabilitation” programme in reducing reoffending? A meta-analysis of evaluations in four countries. Psychology, Crime & Law,12(1), 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, L. A., & Washington, A. (2016). Mental illness and juvenile offenders. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,13(2), 228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, G. (2012a). The black child savers: Racial democracy and juvenile justice. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T. (2012b). Moral strangers or fellow travelers? Contemporary perspectives on offender rehabilitation. Legal and Criminological Psychology,17(1), 37–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, G., & Kupchik, A. (2009). Accountable to what? Punishment and Society,11(1), 85–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T., & Maruna, S. (2007). Rehabilitation. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Western, B., Braga, A., Davis, J., & Sirois, C. (2015). Stress and hardship after prison. American Journal of Sociology,120(5), 1512–1547.

    Google Scholar 

U.S. Supreme Court Cases

  • Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48 (2010)

  • Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012)

  • Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U.S. ___ (2016)

  • Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005)

Download references

Acknowledgements

I want to thank Randy Myers and Tim Goddard for the invitation, the reviewers and editors for their thoughtful feedback and the volume’s other authors for their insightful contributions. Special thanks to Elliott Currie for his ongoing support of critical analysis, social justice and the writing process.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Criminology and Criminal Justice, Ohio Dominican University, Columbus, OH, USA

    Sonya Goshe

Authors
  1. Sonya Goshe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sonya Goshe.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goshe, S. How Contemporary Rehabilitation Fails Youth and Sabotages the American Juvenile Justice System: A Critique and Call for Change. Crit Crim 27, 559–573 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-019-09473-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-019-09473-5

Search

Navigation