Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Harm at Work: Bullying and Special Liberty in the Retail Sector

  • Published:
Critical Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article draws upon a number of concepts from contemporary criminological theory to address bullying and violence in the workplace. Utilizing empirical data from the UK service economy, the article argues that workplace violence includes verbal and emotional abuse and bullying. Management bullying, workplace cliques and the retail practice of “stealing sales” within the organizational and political-economic context of competition, profitability and targets reflect cultural manifestations of economic imperatives and subjective motivations that can lead to harmful and problematic practice. In considering this evidence from an ultra-realist perspective, the article suggests that some subjects, libidinally invested in the corporate workplace’s symbolic order, believe themselves to possess the “special liberty” to rise above normative codes and rules, as well as ethical obligations, in order to maximize self-interest through harmful actions that have negative consequences for co-workers. The workplace “bailiff” reflects the complex interplay between culture, political economy and subjective motivation to act in harmful ways within the workplace.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Ames, M. (2007). Going Postal: Rage, Murder and Rebellion in America. London: Snowbooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, O. (2002). Why workplace bullying and violence are different: protecting employees from both. In M. Gill, B. Fisher, & V. Bowie (Eds.), Violence at work: Causes, patterns and prevention (pp. 151–164). Cullompton, Devon: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, J. E., & Bartlett, M. (2011). Workplace bullying: An integrative literature review. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 13(1), 69–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlingieri, A. (2015). Workplace bullying: Exploring an emerging framework. Work, Employment & Society, 29(2), 342–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. (2008). A realist theory of science. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, N. (2011). The shallows: What the internet is doing to our brains. London: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, L. J., & Hodson, R. (2010). Toxic work environments: What helps and what hurts. Sociological Perspectives, 53(4), 455–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. (2002). Folk devils and moral panics (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, E. (1985). Confronting crime: An American challenge. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, E. (1997). Market, crime and community: Towards a mid-range theory of post-industrial violence. Theoretical Criminology, 1(2), 147–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., & Cooper, C. (2011). The concept of bullying and harassment at work: The European tradition. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Developments in theory, research, and practice (2nd ed., pp. 3–40). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, J. (2018). Drift: Illicit mobility and uncertain knowledge. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, J., Hayward, K., & Young, J. (2015). Cultural criminology (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, M. (2009). Capitalist realism. Winchester: Zero.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, P., & Sturdy, A. (2011). ‘Being yourself’ in the electronic sweatshop: New forms of normative control. Human Relations, 64(2), 177–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, M., Fisher, B., & Bowie, V. (2002). Violence at work: Causes, patterns and prevention. Cullompont, Devon: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M., & Hirschi, T. (1990). Positive criminology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (2012a). Theorizing crime and deviance. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (2012b). The solicitation of the trap: On transcendence and Transcendental Materialism in advanced consumer-capitalism. Human Studies, 35(3), 365–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S., & Winlow, S. (2007). Cultural criminology and primitive accumulation. Crime Media Culture, 3(1), 82–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S., & Winlow, S. (2015). Revitalizing criminological theory: Towards a new ultra-realism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S., Winlow, S., & Ancrum, C. (2008). Criminal identities and consumer culture. Cullompton, Devon: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillyard, P., & Tombs, S. (2004). Beyond Criminology? In P. Hillyard, C. Pantazis, S. Tombs, & D. Gordon (Eds.), Beyond criminology: Taking harm seriously (pp. 10–29). London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoel, H., & Salin, D. (2003). Organizational antecedents of workplace bullying. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace: International perspectives in research and practice (pp. 221–236). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, A. (2008). Žižek’s ontology: A transcendental materialist theory of subjectivity. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (1988). Seductions of crime. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korczynski, M., & Evans, C. (2013). Customer abuse to service workers: An analysis of its social creation within the service economy. Work, Employment & Society, 27(5), 768–784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lea, J., & Young, J. (1993). What is to be done about Law and Order? (2nd ed.). London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, A. (2012). Working to live, not living to work: Work, leisure and youth identity among call centre workers in North East England. Current Sociology, 60(5), 619–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, A. (2013). Labour markets and identity on the post-industrial assembly line. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, A. (2017). Ideology at work: Reconsidering ideology, the labour process and workplace resistance. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 37(5/6), 266–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, A. (2018). The harms of work: An ultra-realist account of the service economy. Bristol: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (2011). After virtue: A study in moral theory. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D., Mackenzie, N., & Healy, J. (2012). Balancing risk and professional identity, secondary school teachers’ narratives of violence. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 13(4), 398–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, R. (2016). Realist criminology, the new aetiological crisis and the crime drop. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 5(3), 2–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, R. (2017). False starts, wrong turns and dead ends: Reflections on recent developments in criminology. Critical Criminology: An International Journal, 25(4), 577–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meloni, M. (2014). How biology became social, and what it means for social theory. The Sociological Review, 62(3), 593–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton, S. (2016). Harmful societies: Understanding social harm. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymen, T. (2017). Living in the end times through popular culture: An ultra-realist analysis of The Walking Dead as popular criminology. Crime Media Culture. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659017721277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, M., et al. (2015). Social class in the 21st century. London: Pelican.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schindeler, E. (2013). Workplace violence: Extending the boundaries of criminology. Theoretical Criminology, 18(3), 371–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shildrick, T., et al. (2012). Poverty and insecurity. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, M. M. (2012). Unfair treatment in the workplace and worker well-being: The role of co-worker support in a service work environment. Work and Occupations, 39(1), 3–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, O., & Raymen, T. (2018). Deviant leisure: A criminological perspective. Theoretical Criminology, 22(1), 63–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standing, G. (2011). The precariat: The new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tombs, S. (2004). Workplace injury and death: Social harm and the illusions of law. In P. Hillyard, C. Pantazis, S. Tombs, & D. Gordon (Eds.), Beyond criminology: Taking harm seriously (pp. 156–177). London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tombs, S. (2017). Social protection after the crisis: Regulation without enforcement. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tombs, S., & Whyte, D. (2007). Safety crimes. Cullompton, Devon: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treadwell, J., et al. (2013). Shopocalypse now: Consumer culture and the English riots of 2011. The British Journal of Criminology, 53, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakeman, S. (2017). The ‘one who knocks’ and the ‘one who waits’: Gendered violence in Breaking Bad. Crime Media Culture, 14(2), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659016684897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. L. (2006). Inside toyland: Working, shopping and social inequality. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winlow, S., & Hall, S. (2013). Rethinking social exclusion: The end of the social? London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winlow, S., & Hall, S. (2016). Realist criminology and its discontents. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 5(3), 80–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (2000). The Ticklish subject: The absent centre of political ontology. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony Lloyd.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Statement

This study was approved by my host institution’s Research Ethics Committee and conducted in compliance with the British Society of Criminology’s statement on ethical practice.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lloyd, A. Harm at Work: Bullying and Special Liberty in the Retail Sector. Crit Crim 28, 669–683 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-019-09445-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-019-09445-9

Navigation