Skip to main content
Log in

Digital Uses, Victimization and Online Aggression: A Comparative Study Between Primary School and Lower Secondary School Students in France

  • Published:
European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the growing use of electronic communication among children and adolescents, the Internet has become an important tool for their socialization and has opened up new perspectives for network and community building opportunities. However, the Internet and electronic communication tools can be used either positively or negatively and the spread of its use in these recent years has led to online risky behaviours and harm. This questionnaire survey was completed in five primary schools and seven lower secondary schools in the South of France. It sets out to assess the digital uses, risk taking and negative experiences online among primary and secondary school students in France (N = 4200). Findings show that primary school students are pretty well involved in digital communication since they spend an average of 150 min per day online vs. 190 for secondary school participants. Social networking is also part of their lives with 17 % of primary school children and 50 % secondary school students who use Facebook. In terms of risk taking, only 49 % of primary students and 39 % of secondary school students report they personally know all their online friends. Cyberbullying figures show that quite a few respondents have been affected with negative experiences among which some were repeatedly victimized (14 % in primary schools and 5 % in secondary schools). These findings highlight the necessity to take the issue of educating towards a positive and safe use of the Internet seriously and that primary school children also need to be provided with proper guidance towards a safer Internet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Flaming refers to sending nasty messages using vulgar and angry language as part of an intense argument in chat rooms, instant messages or emails.

  2. Outing and trickery are sharing someone’s secret or privacy online.

  3. Impersonation: breaking into someone’s account and pretending to be that person to send messages to make her/him look bad, get in trouble, break friendship and socially isolate her/him or damage her/his reputation.

  4. Stalking is the sending of messages repeatedly to intimidate and make the target worried for her or his safety. These messages can be explicitly threatening.

  5. SNS and notably Facebook are not allowed under the age of 13 in compliance with the COPPA (Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act — 1998) and the National Commission « Informatique et Libertés », www.jeunes.cnil.fr

  6. For the purpose of this paper, the use of « young people » refers to any child under the age of 18.

References

  • Beran, T., & Li, Q. (2007). The relationship between cyberbullying and school bullying. Journal of Student Wellbeing, 1(2), 15–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaya, C. (2013). Les ados dans le cyberespace. Prises de risque et cyberviolence. Bruxelles: De Boeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaya, C. & Alava, S. (2012). Risques et sécurité des enfants sur Internet: rapport pour la France - résultats de l’enquête EU Kids Online menée auprès des 9-16 ans et de leurs parents en France. EU Kids Online, London chool of Economics & Political Science, London, UK. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/46443/

  • Calvete, E., Orue, I., Estévez, A., Villardón, L., & Padilla, P. (2010). Cyberbullying in adolescents: modalities and aggressors’ profile. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1128–1135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, M. A., Slee, P. T., Spears, B. A., Butler, D., & Kift, S. (2013). Docyberbullies suffer too? Cyberbullies’ perceptions of the harm they cause to others and to their own mental health. School Psychology International, 34, 613–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Card, N. (2013). Definitions: Another perspective and a proposal for beginning with cyberaggression. In S. Bauman, D. Cross, & J. Walker (Eds.), Principles of cyberbullying research (pp. 41–45). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debarbieux, E. (2006). Violences à l’école: Un défi mondial? Paris: Armand Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaolis, K., Williford, A. (2014). The Nature and Prevalence of Cyber Victimization Among Elementary School Children. Child Youth Care Forum.

  • Garcia-Guilabert, N. (2014). Victimizacion de los menores por actos de ciberacoso continuado y actividades cotidianas en el ciberespacio. Tesis doctoral en ciencias sociales. Escuela Internacional de Doctorado. Universidad de Murcia.

  • Hemphill, S. A., Kotevski, A., Tollit, M., Smith, R., Herrenkohl, T. I., Toumbourou, J. W., et al. (2012). Longitudinal predictors of cyber and traditional bullying perpetration in Australian secondary school students. Journal of Adolescent Health. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.11.019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2009). Bullying beyond the schoolyard: Preventing and responding to cyberbullying. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

  • Holloway, D., Green, L., & Livingstone, S. (2014). Zero to eight. Young children and their Internet use, LSE. London: EU Kids Online.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juvonen, J., & Gross, F. (2008). Extending the school grounds? Bullying experiences in cyberspace. Journal of School Health, 78(9), 496–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keith, S., & Martin, M. (2004). Cyberbullying: creating a culture of respect in a cyber world. Reclaiming Children and Youth, 13(4), 224–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kredens, E., Fontar, B. (2010). Comprendre le comportement des enfants et adolescents sur Internet pour les protéger des dangers. Rapport pour Fréquences Ecole pour l’Education aux Médias. Fondation pour l’Enfance.

  • Lenhart, A., Madden, M., Smith, A., Purcell, K., Zickuhr, K., & Rainie, L. (2011). Teens, kindness and cruelty on socialnetwork sites. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Teens-and-social-media/Summary/Findings.aspx

  • Li, Q. (2005). Cyberbullying in Schools: Nature and Extent of Canadian Adolescents’ Experience. Online Submission, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Montreal, Canada, Apr 2005). Consulté sur ERIC database, 03/2011.

  • Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A., & Ólafsson, K. (2011). Risks and safety on the internet: The perspective of European children. London: Full findings, LSE. EU Kids Online.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mascheroni, G., & Cuman, A. (2014). Net children go mobile: Final report. Deliverables D6.4 & D.5.2. Milano: Educatt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mascheroni, G., & Olafsson, K. (2014). Net children go mobile: The UK report: Risks and opportunities (2nd edn.). Milan: Educatt.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLoughlin, C., Meyricke, R. & Burgess, J. (2009). Bullies in Cyberspace: How rural, and regional Australian youth perceive the problem of cyberbullying and its impact. Communication présentée à l’International Symposium for Innovation in Rural Éducation (ISFIRE), Armidale (Australia). Retrieved from http://www.une.edu.au/simerr/ISFIRE/pages/ISFIRE_proceedings.pdf

  • Menesini, E., Innocenti, A., Palladino, B., Scheithauer, H., Schultze-Krumbholz, A., Frisen, A., Berne, S., Naruskov, K., Ortega, R., Calmaestra, J., Blaya, C., & Berthaud, J. (2012). Cyberbullying definition among adolescents: a comparison across six European countries. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15(9), 455–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monks, C. P., Robinson, S., & Worlidge, P. (2012). The emergence of cyberbullying: a survey of primary school pupil’s perceptions and experiences. School Psychology International, 33, 477–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ofcom. (2013). Children and parents: Media use and attitudes report. London: Office of Communications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofcom (2014). The Communications market 2014. Retrieved from http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data/communications-market-reports/cmr14

  • Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2012). Cyberbullying prevention and response, expert perspectives. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta, A., & Chaudhuri, A. (2011). Are social networking sites a source of online harassment for teens? Evidence from survey data. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(2), 284–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, F., & Duhautois, S. (2011). Les adolescents, le téléphone et l’Internet mobile: sondage action innocence, UNAF, TNS SOFRES. http://www.tns-sofres.com/_assets/files/2009.10.06-ados-mobiles.pdf (Accédé en ligne le 15 novembre 2012).

  • Smith, P. K. (2011). Bullying in schools: Thirty years of research. In C. Monks & I. Coyne (Eds.), Bullying in different contexts (pp. 36–60). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511921018.003.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 376–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. K., Steffgen, G., & Sittichai, R. (2013). The nature of cyberbullying, and an international network. In P. K. Smith & G. Steffgen (Eds.), Cyberbullying through the new media: Findings from an international network (pp. 3–19). Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornberg, R. (2011). She’s weird!” – The social construction of bullying in school: a review of qualitative research. Children & Society, 25, 258–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokunaga, R. S. (2010). Following you home from school: a critical review and synthesis of research on cyber bullying victimization. Computers in Human Behaviour, 26, 277–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Völlink, T., Bolman, C., Dehue, F., & Jacobs, N. (2013). Coping with cyberbullying: differences between victims, bully-victims and children not involved in bullying. Journal of Community and Applied SocialPsychology, 23, 7–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willard, N. (2003). Off-campus, harmful online student speech. Journal of School Violence, 1(2), 65–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willard, N. (2007). Educator’s guide to cyberbullying cyberthreats and sexting. Retrieved from http://csriu.org/cyberbully/documents/educatorsguide.pdf

  • Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2004). Online aggressor/targets, aggressors, and targets: a comparison of associated youth characteristics. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(7), 1308–1316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2008). Prevalence & frequency of internet harassment instigation: implications or adolescent health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(2), 189–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ybarra, M. L., Diener-West, M., & Leaf, P. (2007). Examining the overlap in internet harassment and school bullying: implications for school intervention. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, 42–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This publication and the study presented has been produced with the financial support of the DAPHNE programme of the European Union. European Daphne III Program (Project JUST/2011/DAP/AG/3259) Tabby in Internet. Threat Assessment of Bullying Behaviour among youngsters. Tranferring Internet Preventive procedures in Europe. The contents of this article are the sole responsibility of the authors of the article and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Commission. No conflict of interest is present.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Blaya Catherine.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Catherine, B., Michael, F. Digital Uses, Victimization and Online Aggression: A Comparative Study Between Primary School and Lower Secondary School Students in France. Eur J Crim Policy Res 22, 285–300 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-015-9293-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-015-9293-7

Keywords

Navigation