Skip to main content
Log in

The Cognitive Therapy Scale and Cognitive Therapy Scale-Revised as Measures of Therapist Competence in Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Depression: Relations with Short and Long Term Outcome

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Therapist competence is an important factor in treatment integrity. This study reports on a direct comparison of the original Cognitive Therapy Scale (CTS) with the revised version, the Cognitive Therapy Scale-Revised (CTS-R), as observational instruments designed to evaluate therapist competence in a completed trial of Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) for depression. Treatment sessions (N = 94) from 50 depressed participants (M age = 39.2 years, 76% female, with an average of 5.9 depressive episodes) were evaluated on the CTS and CTS-R by trained independent observers who were blind to treatment outcome, as well as to subject, and session numbers. A comprehensive training program and inter-rater reliability monitoring protocol were employed. Two models were used to compare CTS and CTS-R in relation to change in depression symptoms at termination, 12 and 24 month follow-up while controlling for pre-treatment depression levels and working alliance. Both the CTS and CTS-R demonstrated comparable internal reliability, interrater reliability, and when assessed in early treatment phase, both predicted a statistically significant reduction in depressive symptomatology at termination. No significant competence-outcome relations were detected with late CTS and CTS-R ratings, and the significant positive interaction terms indicated relations with depressive symptomatology were not maintained at follow-up. Given these findings, we encourage future research to examine specific competence domains and “therapist drift” with an increased number of session assessments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A non-normal data distribution was evident with present study WAI data, so the statistical assumptions for the ICC index were violated (Whitehurst, 1985) and the Finn’s r index was chosen to measure interrater reliability. Finn’s r is less affected by restricted range and non-normal data (Tinsley & Weiss, 2000) and has been adopted in prior clinical research (see Fenton et al., 2000; Raue et al. 1993).

  2. If a specific session recording was unavailable or inaudible, the nearest contiguous session recording was used to rate the CTS and CTS-R within a maximum range of three sessions (e.g., if session 15 was unavailable, the next available recording was within the range of sessions 12–18). The early phase of therapy was represented by session 2 (n = 2), session 3 (n = 44), session 5 (n = 1), and session 6 (n = 1), totaling n = 48 sessions. The late phase of therapy was represented by session 12 (n = 3), and session 15 (n = 43), totaling n = 46 sessions.

References

Download references

Funding

Funding was provided by Helen Macpherson Smith Trust and National Institute of Mental Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikolaos Kazantzis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors state that there are no conflicts of interests to disclose in this submitted work to Cognitive Therapy & Research.

Ethical Approval

This research was reviewed and approved by the Monash University Human Ethics Committee (Project ID #2589). The parent study was conducted at the University of Washington (Jacobson et al., 1996) and had received prior ethical approval.

Informed Consent

All research participants provided informed consent prior to participation. All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committees and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments. In addition, the attribution of authorship on this manuscript has also been carefully considered and is being made in a manner that is consistent with ethical research practice.

Animal Rights

No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kazantzis, N., Clayton, X., Cronin, T.J. et al. The Cognitive Therapy Scale and Cognitive Therapy Scale-Revised as Measures of Therapist Competence in Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Depression: Relations with Short and Long Term Outcome. Cogn Ther Res 42, 385–397 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-018-9919-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-018-9919-4

Keywords

Navigation