Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Self-Discrepancies Among Individuals with a History of Depression: The Role of Feared Self-Guides

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined self-discrepancies, self-guide expectancies, and self-guide importance in vulnerability to depression using a remitted depression design. Results indicated that individuals with past episodes of depression exhibited greater actual-feared self-guide congruence compared to their never depressed counterparts. In other words, previously depressed individuals viewed their actual selves as closer to what they feared becoming compared to individuals without a history of depression. Further, individuals with past episodes of depression believed that they would be more likely to embody feared self-guides in the future compared to their never depressed counterparts. These findings remained significant after statistically controlling for differences in current depressive symptoms. Our findings suggest that feared self-guides may play an important role in vulnerability to episodes of depression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. Miller and Chapman (2001) raise concerns about use of ANCOVA to control group differences when groups were not based on random assignment. In particular, Miller and Chapman make the case that it is inappropriate to covary out conceptually substantive variance from two groups who by definition differ on the covariate. To do so, leaves variance in the dependent variable that reflects a phenomenon that either does not exist in nature, is no longer conceptually meaningful or that is conceptually distinct from the phenomenon of interest. The issue then is whether or not current depressive symptoms reflect “essential variance” in the history of depression variable that cannot be removed without substantively altering the construct. In other words, are elevated current depressive symptoms a fundamental component of having once met lifetime criteria for major depression? Is the history of depression variable no longer substantively meaningful after removing variance related to current symptoms?

    If current symptoms are an essential feature of past depression, it would be inappropriate to treat them as a covariate, just as it would be inappropriate to covary out variance related to current symptoms from an analysis comparing individuals who meet criteria for current MDD versus those who do not. However, given that depression typically involves a fluctuating course that includes well periods with minimal or no symptoms, we believe that our use of an ANCOVA to handle group differences in current depressive symptoms is appropriate. Indeed this is the same logic used in prospective studies investigating predictors of change in depression over time. Such studies typically treat baseline depressive symptoms as a covariate because these are strongly predictive of future symptoms (the dependent variable) and are usually correlated with the variables that are being tested as predictors of change in depression.

  2. Vergara and Roberts (2011) examined temperament and goal setting among individuals with and without a past history of depression in this same sample. Results indicated that previously depressed individuals reported greater numbers of avoidance goals and higher scores on the behavioral activation system (BAS). In order to provide a stringent test of the current hypotheses, we included number of avoidance goals and BAS as covariates. Results were similar to those reported above. In particular, previously depressed individuals reported higher scores on actual-feared self-guide congruence, F (1,79) = 14.06, P < .01, η 2 = 15, and higher expectations that feared self-guides would be attained in the future, F (1,79) = 8.90, P < .01, η 2 = .10, compared to never depressed individuals.

  3. When feared self-guides that met DSM-IV MDD symptom criteria were not removed from analyses, previously depressed individuals reported higher scores on actual-feared self-guide congruence, F (1,81) = 10.53, P < .01, η 2 = 12, and higher expectations that feared self-guides would be attained in the future, F (1,81) = 8.63, P < .01, η 2 = 10, compared to never depressed individuals. Similar null results to those reported in the text were found when examining group differences in importance of feared self-guides, F (1,80) = .03, P = .85, η 2 = 0.

References

  • Beck, A. (1987). Cognitive models of depression. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 1(1), 5–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A., Steer, R., Ball, R., & Ranieri, W. (1996). Comparison of Beck depression inventories-IA and -II in psychiatric outpatients. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67(3), 588–597.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boldero, J., & Francis, J. (2000). The relation between self-discrepancies and emotion: The moderating roles of self-guide importance, location relevance, and social self-domain centrality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(1), 38–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Box, G. E. P., & Cox, D. R. (1964). An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 26(2), 211–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, D., Tiffany, S., Coon, H., Scholand, M., McMahon, W., & Leppert, M. (2007). The PHQ 9 as a brief assessment of lifetime major depression. Psychological Assessment, 19(2), 247–251.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C., Lawrence, J., & Scheier, M. (1999). Self-discrepancies and affect: Incorporating the role of feared selves. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(7), 783–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornette, M., Strauman, T., Abramson, L., & Busch, A. (2009). Self-discrepancy and suicidal ideation. Cognition and Emotion, 23(3), 504–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, J., & MacLeod, A. (2006). Dysphoric adolescents’ causal explanations and expectancies for approach and avoidance goals. Journal of Adolescence, 29(2), 177–191.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fairbrother, N., & Moretti, M. (1998). Sociotropy, autonomy, and self-discrepancy: Status in depressed, remitted depressed, and control participants. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 22(3), 279–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowles, D. (1994). A motivational theory of psychopathology. Integrative views of motivation, cognition, and emotion (pp. 181–238). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haeffel, G., Abramson, L., Voelz, Z., Metalsky, G., Halberstadt, L., Dykman, B., et al. (2005). Negative cognitive styles, dysfunctional attitudes, and the remitted depression paradigm: A search for the elusive cognitive vulnerability to depression factor among remitted depressives. Emotion, 5(3), 343–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. (1996). The ‘self digest’: Self-knowledge serving self-regulatory functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(6), 1062–1083.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E., & Bargh, J. (1987). Social cognition and social perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 369–425.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hopko, D., Lejuez, C., Ruggiero, K., & Eifert, G. (2003). Contemporary behavioral activation treatments for depression: Procedures, principles and progress. Clinical Psychology Review, 23(5), 699–717.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N., Martell, C. R., & Dimidjian, S. (2001). Behavioral activation treatment for depression: Returning to contextual roots. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 8(3), 255–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Just, N., Abramson, L., & Alloy, L. (2001). Remitted depression studies as tests of the cognitive vulnerability hypotheses of depression onset: A critique and conceptual analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 21(1), 63–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kasch, K., Rottenberg, J., Arnow, B., & Gotlib, I. (2002). Behavioral activation and inhibition systems and the severity and course of depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111(4), 589–597.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A., & Chapman, J. P. (2001). Misunderstanding analysis of covariance. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 40–48.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miranda, R., & Mennin, D. (2007). Depression, generalized anxiety disorder, and certainty in pessimistic predictions about the future. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 31(1), 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadakis, A., Prince, R., Jones, N., & Strauman, T. (2006). Self-regulation, rumination, and vulnerability to depression in adolescent girls. Development and Psychopathology, 18(3), 815–829.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, A., Küppers, K., Behnken, A., Kroker, K., Schöning, S., Baune, B., et al. (2009). Implicit and explicit procedural learning in patients recently remitted from severe major depression. Psychiatry Research, 169(1), 1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, A., & Silvia, P. (2010). Individual differences in self-discrepancies and emotional experience: Do distinct discrepancies predict distinct emotions? Personality and Individual Differences, 49(2), 148–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team. (2009). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org/.

  • Rodebaugh, T., & Donahue, K. (2007). Could you be more specific, please: Self-discrepancies, affect, and variation in specificity and relevance. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 63(12), 1193–1207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roelofs, J., Papageorgiou, C., Gerber, R., Huibers, M., Peeters, F., & Arntz, A. (2007). On the links between self-discrepancies, rumination, metacognitions, and symptoms of depression in undergraduates. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45(6), 1295–1305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, L., & O’Hara, M. (1993). Self-discrepancies in clinically anxious and depressed university students. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102(2), 282–287.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan, D., Lecrubier, Y., Sheehan, K., Amorim, P., Janavs, J., Weiller, E., et al. (1998). The mini-international neuropsychiatric interview (M.I.N.I): The development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 59(20), 22–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer, R., Kroenke, K., & Williams, J. (1999). Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: The PHQ primary care study. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 282(18), 1737–1744.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strauman, T. (1989). Self-discrepancies in clinical depression and social phobia: Cognitive structures that underlie emotional disorders? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 98(1), 14–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Teasdale, J., & Dent, J. (1987). Cognitive vulnerability to depression: An investigation of two hypotheses. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 26(2), 113–126.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vergara, C., & Roberts, J. E. (2011). Motivation and goal orientation in vulnerability to depression. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 1281–1290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, 14260, USA

    Chrystal Vergara-Lopez & John E. Roberts

Authors
  1. Chrystal Vergara-Lopez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John E. Roberts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John E. Roberts.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vergara-Lopez, C., Roberts, J.E. Self-Discrepancies Among Individuals with a History of Depression: The Role of Feared Self-Guides. Cogn Ther Res 36, 847–853 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-011-9433-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-011-9433-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation