Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Boundary Negotiating Artifacts: Unbinding the Routine of Boundary Objects and Embracing Chaos in Collaborative Work

  • Published:
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Empirical studies of material artifacts in practice continue to be a rich source of theoretical concepts for CSCW. This paper explores the foundational concept of boundary objects and questions the conception that all objects that move between communities of practice are boundary objects. This research presents the results of a year-long ethnographic study of collaborative work, specifically the multidisciplinary collaborative design of a museum exhibition. I suggest that artifacts can serve to establish and destabilize protocols themselves and that artifacts can be used to push boundaries rather than merely sailing across them. Artifacts used for collaboration do not necessarily exist within a web of standardized processes and disorderly processes should not be treated as “special cases”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albrechtsen H., Jacob E.K. (1998). The Dynamics of Classification Systems as Boundary Objects for Cooperation in the Electronic Library. Library Trends 47(2): 293–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechky B.A. (1999). Crossing Occupational Boundaries: Communication and Learning On a Production Floor. Industrial Engineering. Stanford University, Palo Alto, p 114

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertelsen, O.W. and S. Bødker (2002): Interaction Through Clusters of Artefacts. In 11th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics (ECCE–11), Catania, Italy

  • Boujut J.-F., Blanco E. (2003). Intermediary Objects as a Means to Foster Co-operation in Engineering Design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing 12: 205–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowker G.C., Star S.L. (1999). Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Brereton, M. and B. McGarry (2000): An Observational Study of How Objects Support Engineering Design Thinking and Communication: Implications for the Design of Tangible Media. CHI

  • Bucciarelli L. (1994). Designing Engineers. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. (1985): Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. Power, Action and Belief, Sociological Review Monograph. Journal of Law, Vol. 32. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 196–230

  • Diggins T., Tolmie P. (2003). The ‘Adequate’ Design of Ethnographic Outputs for Practice: Some Explorations of the Characteristics of Design Resources. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 7(July): 147–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckert C. (2001). The Communication Bottleneck in Knitwear Design: Analysis and Computing Solutions. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing 10(1): 29–74

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Garrety K., Badham R. (2000). The Politics of Socio-technical Intervention: An Interactionist View. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 12(1): 103–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper, R. (1998): Inside the IMF: An Ethnography of Documents, Technology and Organizational Action. Academic Press

  • Heath C., Luff P. (1996). Documents and Professional Practice: ‘Bad’ Organizational Reasons for ‘Good’ Clinical Records. ACM, CSCW, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson K. (1999). On Line and On Paper: Visual Representations, Visual Culture, and Computer Graphics in Design Engineering. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertzum M. (1999). Six Roles of Documents in Professionals’ Work. ECSCW, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  • Karsten H., Lyytinen K., et al. (2001). Crossing Boundaries and Conscripting Participation: Representing and Integrating Knowledge in a Paper Machinery Project. European Journal of Information Systems 10(2): 89–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krasner H., Curtis B., et al. (1987). Communication Breakdowns and Boundary Spanning Activities on Large Programming Projects. In: Olson G.M., Shepard S., Soloway E. (eds) Empirical Studies of Programmers: Second Workshop. Ablex, Norwood, NJ, pp. 47–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, A. (2003). Making Sense of Collaboration: The Challenge of Thinking Together in Global Design Teams, GROUP ’03. Sanibel Island, FL: ACM

  • Latour B. (1987). Science in Action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Law J. (1987) Technology, Closure and Heterogeneous Engineering: The Case of the Portuguese Expansion. In: Bijker W., Pinch T., Hughes T.P. (eds) The Social Construction of Technological Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 111–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. (2004): The Role of Boundary Negotiating Artifacts in the Collaborative Design of a Museum Exhibition. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Information Studies. Los Angeles, University of California, Los Angeles: 299

  • Lutters, W.G. and M.S. Ackerman (2002): Achieving Safety: A Field Study of Boundary Objects in Aircraft Technical Support. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW 2002, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA: The Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

  • Mambrey, P. and M. Robinson (1997): Understanding the Role of Documents in a Hierarchical Flow of Work. Group 97, Phoenix, AZ: ACM

  • Pawlowski, S.D. and D. Robey et al. (2000): Supporting Shared Information Systems: Boundary Objects, Communities, and Brokering. Twenty First International Conference on Information Systems. Atlanta, GA: Association for Information Systems

  • Perry M., Sanderson D. (1998). Coordinating Joint Design Work: the Role of Communication and Artefacts. Design Studies 19(3): 273–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pycock J., Bowers J. (1996). Getting Others to Get it Right: An Ethnography of Design Work in the Fashion Industry. CSCW, Boston Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt K., Simone C. (1996). Coordination Mechanisms: Towards a Conceptual Foundation of CSCW Systems Design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing 5(2–3): 155–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt K., Wagner I. (2002). Coordinative Artifacts in Architectural Practice. In: Blay-Fornarino M., Pinna-Dery A.M., Schmidt K., Wagner I. (eds) Cooperative Systems Design. A Challenge of the Mobility Age. IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp 257–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt K., Wagner I. (2005). Ordering Systems: Coordinative Practices and Artifacts in Architectural Design and Planning. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing 13: 349–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnenwald D.H. (1995). Contested Collaboration: A Descriptive Model of Intergroup Communication in Information System Design. Information Processing & Management 31(6): 859–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Star S.L. (1987–1989). The Structure of Ill-Structured Solutions: Boundary Objects and Heterogeneous Distributed Problem Solving. In: Gasser L., Huhns M.N. (eds) Distributed Artificial Intelligence, Vol. II. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, pp 37–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Star S.L., Griesemer J.R. (1989). Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science 19: 387–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss A. (1988). The Articulation of Project Work: An Organizational Process. The Sociological Quarterly 29(2): 163–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subrahmanian E., Monarch I., et al. (2003) Boundary Objects and Prototypes at the Interfaces of Engineering Design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing 12: 185–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang J.C. (1989). Toward an Understanding of the Use of Shared Workspaces by Design Teams. Department of Mechanical Engineering. Stanford University, Stanford, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Van House, N.A., M.H. Butler, et al. (1998): Cooperative Knowledge Work and Practices of Trust: Sharing Environmental Planning Data Sets. CSCW 98. Seattle, Washington: ACM

  • Wenger E. (1998). Communities of Practice. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has benefited from the assistance of Leah Lievrouw, Jonathan Furner, Jennifer A. Rode, the reviewers of this manuscript, and especially Phil Agre and Paul Dourish. This work has been funded in part by NIH grant #5M01RR000827 and a postdoctoral fellowship from the California Institute for Telecommunications and Information Technology (Calit2) at UC Irvine.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. California Institute for Telecommunications and Information Technology, University of California Irvine, 4100 Calit2, Irvine, CA, 92697-2800, USA

    Charlotte P. Lee

Authors
  1. Charlotte P. Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charlotte P. Lee.

Additional information

An earlier draft of the work was published in the Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW 2005). Several pages longer, this work adds substantial clarification of the theoretical critique and also includes photographs of actual case study artifacts.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, C.P. Boundary Negotiating Artifacts: Unbinding the Routine of Boundary Objects and Embracing Chaos in Collaborative Work. Comput Supported Coop Work 16, 307–339 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-007-9044-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-007-9044-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation