Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Beyond Profitability of Energy-Saving Measures—Attitudes Towards Energy Saving

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Consumer Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Private homeowners can save considerable amounts of energy and money, if they retrofit their homes according to up-to-date energy efficiency standards. From an expert point of view, many of these technical measures are profitable in relatively short payback times, if only additional costs are considered. Apparently, many homeowners do not follow this type of rationality and do solely not regard their refurbishment as an investment. Drawing on the results of an empirical survey of retrofit activities among 1,008 homeowners in Germany, it is argued that refurbishments are the outcome of a broader decision which is shaped by an alliance of economic and non-economic motives and goals. Energy-saving measures is expected to lower the burden of operating costs in a perceptible way and secure the value of the house, but they must also correspond to needs like comfort, convenience or belonging in order to be realized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For space reasons, these calculations are not shown, but they can be obtained from the authors on request.

  2. More details can be found (in German) in Stieß et al. 2009a.

References

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amstalden, R. W., Kost, M., Nathani, C., & Imboden, D. M. (2007). Economic potential of energy-efficient retrofitting in the Swiss residential building sector. The effects of policy instruments and energy price expectations. Energy Policy, 35, 1819–1829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awerbuch, S., & Deehan, W. (1995). Do consumers discount the future correctly? Energy Policy, 23, 57–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banfi, S., Mehdi, F., Filippini, M., & Jakob, M. (2008). Willingness to pay for energy-saving measures in residential buildings. Energy Economics, 30, 503–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BMWi. (2007). Zahlen und Fakten: Energiedaten—Internationale und nationale Entwicklungen. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, R. (1983). Investing in energy conservation: Are homeowners passing up high yields? Energy Policy, 11, 63–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gram-Hanssen, K., Bartiaux, F., Jensen, M. O., & Cantaert, M. (2007). Do homeowners use energy labels? A comparison between Denmark and Belgium. Energy Policy, 35, 2879–2888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guy, S., & Shove, E. (2000). A sociology of energy, buildings and the environment: Constructing knowledge, designing practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassett, K. A., & Metcalf, G. E. (1993). Energy conservation investment: Do consumers discount the future correctly? Energy Policy, 21, 710–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A. B., & Stavins, R. N. (1994a). The energy efficiency gap: What does it mean? Energy Policy, 22, 804–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A. B., & Stavins, R. N. (1994b). Energy efficiency investments and public policy. The Energy Journal, 15(2), 43–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakob, M. (2006). Marginal costs, cost dynamics and co-benefits of energy efficiency investments in the residential buildings sector. Energy Policy, 34(2), 172–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jochem, E., & Gruber, E. (1990). Obstacles to rational electricity use and measures to alleviate them. Energy Policy, 18, 340–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2002). Maps of bounded rationality: Nobel lecture. Available from http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/2002/kahneman-lecture.html. Accessed 15 Dec 2009.

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleemann, M. (2006). Verdoppelung des Modernisierungstempos bis 2020: Minderungsziel: 30% Energieeinsparung. Bundesindustrieverband Deutschland Haus-, Energie- und Umwelttechnik e.V..

  • Kleemann, M., Heckler, R., Kolb, G., & Hille, M. (2000). Die Entwicklung des Energiebedarfs zur Wärmebereitstellung in Gebäuden–Ergebnisse. Bremen: Bremer Energie Institut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Wiersma, G. (2003). Household preferences for energy saving measures: A conjoint analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24, 49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shove, E. (2003). Comfort, cleanliness and convenience: The social organisation of normality. New technologies/new cultures series. New York: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C. (1992). What psychology knows about energy conservation? The American Psychologist, 47, 1224–1232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C., Aronson, E., Darley, J. M., Hill, D. H., Hirst, E., Kempton, W., et al. (1986). The effectiveness of incentives for residential energy conservation. Evaluation Review, 10, 147–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stieß, I., Birzle-Harder, B., & Deffner, J. (2009a). “So ein Haus ist auch die Sparkasse von einem”: Motive und Barrieren von Eigenheimbesitzerinnen und -besitzern gegenüber einer energieeffizienten Sanierung: Ergebnisse einer qualitativen Untersuchung. Frankfurt am Main

  • Stieß, I., Zundel, S., & Deffner, J. (2009b). Making the home consume less—Putting energy efficiency on the refurbishment agenda. Proceedings of the 9 th ECEEE Summer Study.

  • Tommerup, H., & Svendsen, S. (2006). Energy savings in Danish residential building stock. Energy and Buildings, 38, 618–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiß, J., & Dunkelberg, E. (2010). Erschließbare Energieeinsparpotentiale im Ein- und Zweifamilienhausbestand. Berlin

  • Wittchen, K. B. (2004). Vurduring af potentialet for varmebesparelser i eksisterende boliger (Estimation of heat saving potential in building stock) Hørsholm: Statens Byggeforskningsinstitut. By og Byg dokumentation No. 057.

  • Yates, S., & Aronson, E. (1983). A social psychological perspective on energy conservation in residential buildings. The American Psychologist, 38, 435–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Tanja Albrecht, Barbara Birzle-Harder, Jutta Deffner, Elisa Dunkelberg and Victoria van der Land from the research team of the ENEF-Haus project (www.enef-haus.de). We would also like to thank to Christine Rieß from Sociotrend who carried out the multivariate statistical analysis and we are particularly grateful to Georg Sunderer from ISOE for substantial methodological advice and support. We also express our gratitude to the German Ministry of Education and Research for funding the ENEF-Haus project.

Finally, we are indebted to two anonymous referees, who helped us with their critical remarks, and to the editors U. Schrader and J. Thøgersen, for their patient and encouraging suggestions for improving the presentation of our argumentation. Any remaining errors are ours.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Zundel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zundel, S., Stieß, I. Beyond Profitability of Energy-Saving Measures—Attitudes Towards Energy Saving. J Consum Policy 34, 91–105 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-011-9156-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-011-9156-7

Keywords

Navigation