Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Customer Response to Carbon Labelling of Groceries

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Consumer Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Thirty-seven products were labelled to indicate embodied carbon emissions, and sales were recorded over a 3-month period. Green (below average), yellow (near average), and black (above average) footprints indicated carbon emissions embodied in groceries. The overall change in purchasing pattern was small, with black-labelled sales decreasing 6% and green-labelled sales increasing 4% after labelling. However, when green-labelled products were also the cheapest, the shift was more substantial, with a 20% switch from black- to green-label sales. These findings illustrate the potential for labelling to stimulate reductions in carbon emissions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ABS. (2006). 2006 Census data by location. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics. Available at: http://www.censusdata.abs.gov.au.

    Google Scholar 

  • ACF. (2007). Consuming Australia. Sydney: Australian Conservation Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2008). Carbon labelling and Tesco. www.tesco.com/assets/greenerliving/content/pdf/Carbon_Labelling_and_Tesco.pdf. Consulted 7 August 2008.

  • Berry, T., Crossley, D., & Jewell, J. (2008). Check-out carbon: The role of carbon labelling in delivering a low-carbon shopping basket. London: Forum for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biel, A., Dahlstrand, U., & Grankvist, G. (2005). Habitual and value-guided purchase behavior. Ambio, 34, 360–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boardman, B. (2008). Carbon labelling: Too complex or will it transform our buying? Significance, 5, 168–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson-Kanyama, A. (1998). Climate change and dietary choices—How can emissions of greenhouse gases from food consumption be reduced? Food Policy, 23, 277–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coley, D., Howard, M., & Winter, M. (2009). Local food, food miles and carbon emissions: A comparison of farm shop and mass distribution approaches. Food Policy, 34, 150–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowburn, G., & Stockley, L. (2005). Consumer understanding and use of nutrition labelling: A systematic review. Public Health Nutrition, 8(1), 21–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards-Jones, G., Milà i Canals, L., Hounsome, N., Truninger, M., Koerber, G., Hounsome, B., et al. (2008). Testing the assertion that ‘local food is best’: The challenges of an evidence-based approach. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 19, 265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, A. S. C. (2000). Repeat buying: Facts, theory and applications. Journal of Empirical Generalisations in Marketing Science, 5, 392–770.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erskine, C. A., & Collins, L. (1997). Eco-labelling: Success or failure? The Environmentalist, 17, 125–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garnaut, R. (2008). The garnaut climate change review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grankvist, G., Dahlstrand, U., & Biel, A. (2004). The impact of environmental labelling on consumer preference: Negative vs. positive labels. Journal of Consumer Policy, 27, 213–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grankvist, G., Lekedal, H., & Marmendal, M. (2007). Values and eco- and fair-trade labelled products. British Food Journal, 109, 169–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunert, K. G., & Wills, J. M. (2007). A review of European research on consumer response to nutrition information on food labels. Journal of Public Health, 15, 385–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S. M. (2007). Does sustainability sell? Market responses to sustainability certification. Management of Environmental Quality, 18, 50–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, P. H. (2006). Central Coast consumers want more food-related information, from safety to ethics. California Agriculture, 60, 14–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, K. J., Moll, H. C., Nonhebel, S., & Wilting, H. C. (1999). Greenhouse gas emissions related to Dutch food consumption. Energy Policy, 27, 203–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laroche, M., Bergeron, J., & Barbaro-Forleo, G. (2001). Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18, 503–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leire, C., & Thidell, A. (2005). Product-related environmental information to guide consumer purchases—A review and analysis of research on perceptions, understanding and use among Nordic consumers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13, 1061–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Megicks, P., Memery, J., & Williams, J. (2008). Influences on ethical and socially responsible shopping: Evidence from the UK grocery sector. Journal of Marketing Management, 24, 637–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noussair, C., Robin, S., & Ruffieux, B. (2002). Do consumers not care about biotech foods or do they just not read the labels? Economics Letters, 75, 47–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, E. R., & Neergaard, P. (2005). Caveat emptor—Let the buyer beware! Environmental labelling and the limitations of green consumerism. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15, 15–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radas, S., Teisl, M. F., & Roe, B. (2008). An open mind wants more: Opinion strength and the desire for genetically modified food labeling policy. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 42, 335–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rex, E., & Baumann, H. (2007). Beyond ecolabels: What green marketing can learn from conventional marketing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15, 567–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubik, F., Frankl, P., Pietroni, L., & Scheer, D. (2007). Eco-labelling and consumers: Towards a re-focus and integrated approaches. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 2, 175–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudell, F. (2006). Shopping with a social conscience: Consumer attitudes toward sweatshop labor. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 24, 282–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirieix, L., Grolleau, G., & Schaer, B. (2008). Do consumers care about food miles? An empirical analysis in France. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32, 508–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, J. D., & Sweeney, L. B. (2007). Understanding public complacency about climate change: Adults’ mental models of climate change violate conservation of matter. Climatic Change, 80, 213–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, N. (2007). The economics of climate change: The Stern review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, D. W., Shamdasani, P. N., & Rook, D. W. (2007). Focus groups: Theory and practice (2nd ed.). New York: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, E., Fryxell, G. E., & Chow, C. S. F. (2004). Visual and verbal communication in the design of eco-label for green consumer products. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 16, 85–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thøgersen, J. (2002). Promoting “green” consumer behavior with eco-labels. In T. Dietz & P. Stern (Eds.), New tools for environmental protection: Education, information, and voluntary measures (pp. 83–104). Washington: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thøgersen, J., Haugaard, P., & Olesen, A. (2010). Understanding consumer responses to ecolabels. European Journal of Marketing, 44, 11/12 (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Valor, C. (2008). Can consumers buy responsibly? Analysis and solutions for market failures. Journal of Consumer Policy, 31, 315–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenbergh, M. P., & Steinemann, A. C. (2007). The carbon-neutral individual. New York University Law Review, 82, 1673–1745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, J. (2007). Easy on the oil: Policy options for a smaller waistline and a lighter footprint. Adelaide: South Australian Department of Premier and Cabinet. www.brass.cf.ac.uk/uploads/Wallace_A70.pdf. Consulted 5 May 2009.

  • Wallén, A., Brandt, N., & Wennersten, R. (2004). Does the Swedish consumer’s choice of food influence greenhouse gas emissions? Environmental Science & Policy, 7, 525–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weightman, D., & McDonagh, D. (2004). Supra-functional factors in sustainable products. In T. Bhamra & B. Hon (Eds.), Design and manufacture for sustainable development 2004 (pp. 91–101). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, W., Hwang, K., McDonald, S., & Oates, C. J. (2010). Sustainable consumption: Green consumer behaviour when purchasing products. Sustainable Development, 18, 20–31.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project received ethics approval number ECN-08-089 from Southern Cross University and was conducted as part of the undergraduate subject FOR00110 Natural Resource Policy within the School of Environmental Science and Management at Southern Cross University. Thanks to the manufacturers and suppliers of goods included in this study for assisting with calculations and supplying information about carbon footprints.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jerome K. Vanclay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vanclay, J.K., Shortiss, J., Aulsebrook, S. et al. Customer Response to Carbon Labelling of Groceries. J Consum Policy 34, 153–160 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-010-9140-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-010-9140-7

Keywords

Navigation