Abstract
Conventional wisdom has it that the absolute (purely negative) veto is ineffective when overridable by a simple majority. That is flatly false. The examples that prove this surprising fact are themselves surprisingly ordinary yet oddly resistant to direct observation. They reveal virtues of a neglected institutional design.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. Downs (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy Harper and Row New York
L. K. Metcalf (2000) ArticleTitle“Measuring Presidential Power” Comparative Political Studies 33 660–85
W. J. Oleszek (2004) Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process Brookings Washington, DC
P. Ordeshook T. Schwartz (1987) ArticleTitle“Agendas and the Control of Political Outcomes” American Political Science Review 81 180–99
T. Schwartz (1981) ArticleTitle“The Universal Instability Theorem” Public Choice 37 487–501
T. Schwartz (1995) ArticleTitle“The Paradox of Representation” The Journal of Politics 57 309–23
T. Schwartz (1999) ArticleTitle“The Executive Veto: Purpose, Procedure, and Paradox” Constitutional Political Economy 10 89–105
M. Shugart (1996) ArticleTitle“Executive-Legislative Relations in Post-Communist Europe” Transition 2 6–11
M. Shugart J. Caney (1992) Presidents, and Assemblies Cambridge University Press Cambridge
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
JEL classification: D71, D72
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schwartz, T. Vetoes Overridable by Simple Majorities. Constit Polit Econ 15, 383–389 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-004-7770-y
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-004-7770-y