Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Continuity of Care: Validation of a Self-Report Measure to Assess Client Perceptions of Mental Health Service Delivery

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Community Mental Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The psychometric characteristics of an instrument to assess perceived continuity of care among mental health patients were examined. 441 adults with severe and persistent mental illness were recruited from 70 inpatient, outpatient, emergency and community treatment programs (n = 259 females; M age = 42.5, SD = 10.3 years) in Alberta, Canada. Respondents completed a 43-item self-report questionnaire to rate perceived continuity. Item quality was assessed by examining missing data and frequency distributions. In a randomly selected subsample (n = 171), exploratory factor analysis identified 3 dimensions: (1) perceived attentiveness to individual needs or changes in illness or life circumstances (Individualized Care; α = .64); (2) perceptions of a coherent system characterized by good communication between providers (Responsive System; α = .71); and (3) perceived responsiveness on the part of a primary provider (Responsive Caregiver; α = .52). In a second random subsample (n = 181), confirmatory factor analysis provided support for this 3-factor structure and the inclusion of a second-order “continuity” factor (α = .72), and informed further item reduction. Split-half reliability for the second-order factor was calculated. Associations between the factors and “objective” measures of continuity, as well as relevant clinical, quality of life, and service satisfaction variables, are reported. Use of the measure for clinical and research purposes and its limitations are considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adair, C. E., McDougall, G. M., Beckie, A., Joyce, A. S., Mitton, C., Wild, T. C., et al. (2003). History and measurement of continuity of care in mental health services and evidence of its role in outcomes. Psychiatric Services, 54, 1351–1356.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Adair, C. E., McDougall, G. M., Mitton, C. R., Joyce, A. S., Wild, T. C., Gordon, A., et al. (2005). Continuity of care and health outcomes among persons with severe mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 56, 1061–1069.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Adair, C. E., Wild, T. C., Joyce, A. S., McDougall, G. M., Gordon, A., Costigan, N., et al. (2001). The Continuity of Mental Health Services (COHMS) Study of Alberta: A research program on continuity of care. Paper presented at the 26th Biennial Congress of the World Assembly for Mental Health, Vancouver, British Columbia.

  • Attkisson, C. C., & Greenfield, T. K. (1996). The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) Scales and the Service Satisfactrion Scale-30 (SSS-30). In L. I. Sederer & B. Dickey (Eds.), Outcomes assessment in clinical practice (pp. 120–127). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachrach, L. L. (1981). Continuity of care for chronic mental patients: A conceptual analysis. American Journal of Psychiatry, 138, 1449–1456.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bachrach, L. L. (1993). Continuity of care and approaches to case management for long-term mentally ill patients. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 44, 465–468.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barbato, A., Terzian, E., Saraceno, B., Barquero, F. M., & Tognon, G. (1992). Patterns of aftercare for psychiatric patients discharged after short inpatient treatment. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 27, 46–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, S., Barron, N., McFarland, B., & Bigelow, D. (1994a). A community ability scale for chronically mentally ill consumers: Part II. Applications. Community Mental Health Journal, 30, 459–472.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, S., Barron, N., McFarland, B., Bigelow, D., & Carnahan, T. (1994b). A community ability scale for chronically mentally ill consumers: Part I. Reliability and validity. Community Mental Health Journal, 30, 363–383.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, R. D., & Windle, C. (1972). A preliminary attempt to measure continuity of care in a community mental health clinic. Community Mental Health Journal, 9, 53–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, M. A., Diamond, R., Douglas, J., & Thornton, D. (1997). Wisconsin Quality of Life Assessment Manual. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, I. H., & Teng, G. (1989). Factoring items and factoring scales are different: Spurious evidence for multidimensionality due to item categorization. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 467–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bindman, J., Johnson, S., Szmukler, G., Wright, S., Kuipers, E., Thornicroft, G., et al. (2000). Continuity of care and clinical outcome: A prospective cohort study. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 35, 242–247.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bolscher, J., & Graf von der Schulenburg, J. M. (1997). Using the EuroQol in mental health. Symposium conducted at the Plenary Meeting of the EuroQol Group, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caron, J., Corbiere, M., Mercier, C. A., Diaz, P., Ricard, N., & Lesage, A. (2003). The construct validity of the client questionnaire of the Wisconsin Quality of Life Index: A cross-validation study. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 12, 128–138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caron, J., Mercier, C., Diaz, P., & Martin, A. (2005). Socio-demographic and clinical predictors of quality of life in patients with schizophrenia or schizo-affective disorder. Psychiatry Research, 137, 203–213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chien, C. F., Steinwachs, D. M., Lehman, A., Fahey, M., & Skinner, E. A. (2000). Provider continuity and outcomes of care for persons with schizophrenia. Mental Health Services Research, 2, 201–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, R., & Becker, M. (1999). The Wisconsin Quality of Life Index: A multidimensional model for measuring quality of life. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 60, 29–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Druss, B., & Rosenheck, R. (1997). Evaluation of the HEDIS measure of behavioral health care quality. Psychiatric Services, 48, 956–957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durbin, J., Goering, P., Streiner, D. L., & Pink, G. (2004). Continuity of care: Validation of a new self-report measure for individuals using mental health services. Journal of Behavioral Sciences & Research, 31, 279–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, (1996). Strategies of measurement and analysis. In H. K. Knudson & G. Thornicroft (Eds.), Mental health services evaluation (pp. 121–142). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R., Wilson, N., & Foster, F. (1984). Statewide treatment outcome assessment in Colorado: The Colorado Client Assessment Record (CCAR). Community Mental Health Journal, 20, 72–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, H. A., Polsky, D., Willke, R. J., & Schulman, K. A. (1999). A comparison of preference assessment instruments used in a clinical trial: Responses to the visual analog scale from the EuroQol EQ-5D and the Health Utilities Index. Society for Medical Decision Making, 19, 265–275.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, G. A., Rosenheck, R. A., & Seibyl, C. L. (2002). Continuity of care and clinical effectiveness: Outcomes following residental treatment for severe substance abuse. Medical Care, 40, 246–259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, T. K., & Attkisson, C. C. (1989). Steps toward a multifactorial satisfaction scale for primary care and mental health services. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12, 271–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 191–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedlund, J. L., & Vieweg, B. W. (1980). The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS): A comprehensive review. Journal of Operational Psychiatry, 11, 48–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S., Prosser, D., Bindman, J., & Szmukler, G. (1997). Continuity of care for the severely mentally ill: Concepts and measures. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 32, 137–142.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, A. S., Wild, T. C., Adair, C. E., McDougall, G. M., Gordon, A., Costigan, N., et al. (2004). Continuity of care in mental health services: Toward clarifying the construct. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 49, 539–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopelowicz, A., Wallace, C. J., & Zarate, R. (1998). Defining and measuring continuity of care. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 49, 1313–1316.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitton, C. R., Adair, C. E., McDougall, G. M., & Marcoux, G. (2005). Continuity of care and health care costs among persons with severe mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 56, 1070–1076.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnaly, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory (pp. 316–318). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32, 396–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overall, J. E., & Gorham, D. R. (1988). The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS): Recent developments in ascertainment and scaling. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 24, 97–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, T. F., & MacMahon, B. (1967). Measurement of discontinuity of psychiatric inpatient care. Public Health Reports, 82, 533–538.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, H. M., & Overall, J. E. (1988). The semistructured BPRS interview and rating guide. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 24, 101–104.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, J., & Curtis, P. (1980). The concept and measurement of continuity of primary care. American Journal of Public Health, 70, 122–127.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan, D., Lecrubier, Y., Harnett-Sheehan, K., Amorim, P., Janavs, J., Weiller, E., et al. (1998). The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI): The development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 59, 22–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shenn, D. L., Wilson, N. Z., Coen, A. S., et al. (1994). Client outcomes II: Longitudinal client data from the Colorado treatment outcome study. Millbank Quarterly, 72, 123–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sytema, S., Micciolo, R., & Tansella, M. (1997). Continuity of care for patients with schizophrenia and related disorders: A comparative South Verona and Groningen case-register study. Psychological Medicine, 27, 1355–1362.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tessler, R. C., Willis, G., & Gubman, G. D. (1986). Defining and measuring continuity of care. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 10, 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware, N. C., Dickey, B., Tugenberg, T., & McHorney, C. A. (2003). CONNECT: A measure of continuity of care in mental health services. Mental Health Services Research, 5, 209–221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ware, N. C., Tugenberg, T., Dickey, B., & McHorney, C. A. (1999). An ethnographic study of the meaning of continuity of care in mental health services. Psychiatric Services, 50, 395–400.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zani, B., McFarland, B., Wachal, M., Barker, S., & Barron, N. (1999). Statewide replication of predictive validation for the Multnomah Community Ability Scale. Community Mental Health Journal, 35, 223–229.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 432–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a research program grant from the Canadian Health Services Research Foundation, the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research, the Alberta Mental Health Board, the Institute for Health Economics, and an unrestricted grant from Eli Lilly (Canada), Inc.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony S. Joyce.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Joyce, A.S., Adair, C.E., Wild, T.C. et al. Continuity of Care: Validation of a Self-Report Measure to Assess Client Perceptions of Mental Health Service Delivery. Community Ment Health J 46, 192–208 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-009-9215-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-009-9215-6

Keywords

Navigation