Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Are the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales a Valid and Practical Instrument to Measure Outcomes in North America? A Three-Site Evaluation Across Nova Scotia

  • OriginalPaper
  • Published:
Community Mental Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We tested the usability, sensitivity and validity of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS) in routine clinical practice in North America. Three pilot sites provided ratings on all inpatient and outpatient referrals over 4 months using versions covering children and adolescents (HoNOSCA), working-age adults and the over-65s. Data were entered using the routine administrative data system. Sixty-one percent of eligible patients had at least one HoNOS rating (n = 485). Following the initial rating, subsequent completion rates reached 80%. Ratings were sensitive to time and setting, with significantly higher scores in inpatients than outpatients. Individual diagnoses had different patterns of scores, further supporting validity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amin S., Singh S. P., Croudace T., Jones P., Medley I. & Harrison G. (1999). Evaluating the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales. Reliability and validity in a three-year follow-up of first-onset psychosis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 174, 399–403.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington P., Brugha T., Hill T., Marsden L., & Window S. (1999). Validation of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales. British Journal of Psychiatry, 174, 389–394.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burns A., Beevor A., Lelliott P., Wing J., Blakey A., Orrell M., Mulinga J., & Hadden S. (1999a). Health of the nation outcome scales for elderly people (HoNOS 65+). British Journal of Psychiatry, 174, 424–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns A., Beevor A., Lelliott P., Wing J., Blakey A., Orrell M., Mulinga J., & Hadden S. (1999b). Health of the nation outcome scales for elderly people (HoNOS 65+). Glossary for HoNOS 65+ score sheet. British Journal of Psychiatry, 174, 435–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coetzer R., & Du Toit P. L. (2001). HoNOS–ABI; a clinically useful outcome measure? Psychiatric Bulletin, 25, 421–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis D. F., & Fong M. L. (1996). Measuring outcomes in psychiatry: An inpatient model. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, 22, 125–133.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fonagy P., Matthews R., & Pilling S. (2004) The mental health outcomes measurement initiative: Report from the chair of the outcomes reference group. London: National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, Department of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowers S. G., Harrington R. C., Whitton A., Lelliott P., Beevor A., Wing J., & Jezzard R. (1999a). A brief scale for measuring the outcomes of emotional and behavioural disorders in children. Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA). British Journal of Psychiatry, 174, 413–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowers S. G., Harrington R. C., Whitton A., Beevor A., Lelliott P., Jezzard R., & Wing J. K. (1999b). Health of the nation outcome scales for children and adolescents (HoNOSCA). Glossary for HoNOSCA score sheet. British Journal of Psychiatry, 174, 428–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauzon S., Corbiere M., Bonin J. P., Bonsack C., Lesage A. D., & Ricard N. (2001). Validation of the French version of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS-F). Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 46, 841–846.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEwan K. & Goldner E. M. (2001). Accountability and performance indicators for mental health services and supports: A resource kit prepared for the Federal/Provincial/Territorial advisory network on mental health. Ottawa: Government Services Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirin S. M. & Namerow M. J. (1991). Why study treatment outcome? Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 42,1007–1013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirkis, J., Burgess, P., Dunt, D., & Henry, L. (1999). Measuring quality in Australian mental health services. Report to the Outcomes Branch, Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care, 1:164

  • Roy A., Matthews H., Clifford P., Fowler V., & Martin D. M. (2002). Health of the nation outcome scales for people with learning disabilities (HoNOS-LD). British Journal of Psychiatry, 180, 61–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stein G. S. (1999). Usefulness of the health of the nation outcome scales. British Journal of Psychiatry, 174, 375–377.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trauer T. (2004). Use of a routine outcome measure in a consultation-liaison mental health service. Australasian Psychiatry, 12, 139–144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trauer T., Callaly T., Hantz P., Little J., Shields R., & Smith J. (1999). Health of the nation outcome scales. Results of the Victorian field trial. British Journal of Psychiatry, 174, 380–388.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tri-Council of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC), the Medical Research Council (MRC), and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) (1998) Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans. Ottawa: Government of Canada. Retrieved June 5, 2006, from http://www.ncehr-cnerh.org/english/code_2/

  • Wing J. K., Curtis R. H., & Beevor A. S. (1996). HoNOS: Health of the nation outcome scales: Report on research and development July 1993–December 1995. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wing J. K., Beevor A. S., Curtis R. H., Park S. B. G., Hadden S., Burns A. (1998). Health of the nation outcome scales (HoNOS): Research and development. British Journal of Psychiatry, 172, 11–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wing J., Curtis R. H., & Beevor A. (1999). Health of the nation outcome scales (HoNOS). Glossary for HoNOS score sheet. British Journal of Psychiatry, 174, 432–434.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organisation (1992). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organisation Retrieved June 5, 2006, from http://www.3.who.int/icd/currentversion/fr-icd.htm

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Nova Scotia Department of Health provided funding for the study. We also wish to thank the clinicians who completed the forms and the following past and present members of the Mental Health Monitoring Working Group at the Nova Scotia Health Department: A. Mackenzie, B. Macconnell, K. Briand, C. Gilbert, L. Judge, S. Shaddick, T. Prime, M. Pennock, G. Doyle-Bedwell and K. Martin.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Kisely M.D., M.Sc..

Additional information

Stephen Kisely is affiliated with the Departments of Psychiatry, Community Health and Epidemiology; Health Outcomes Unit, Capital District Health Authority; Centre for Clinical Research, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Leslie Anne Campbell is affiliated with the Departments of Psychiatry, Community Health and Epidemiology; Health Outcomes Unit, Capital District Health Authority, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Doug Crossman is affiliated with the South Shore Health, Bridgewater, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Stephen Gleich is affiliated with the Colchester East Hants Health Authority Department of Psychiatry; Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Truro, Nova Scotia, Canada.

John Campbell is affiliated with the Nova Scotia Health Department, Mental Health Branch, Hollis St., Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kisely, S., Campbell, L.A., Crossman, D. et al. Are the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales a Valid and Practical Instrument to Measure Outcomes in North America? A Three-Site Evaluation Across Nova Scotia. Community Ment Health J 43, 91–107 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-006-9067-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-006-9067-2

Keywords

Navigation