Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Variations in Mental Health Courts: Challenges, Opportunities, and a Call for Caution

  • Published:
Community Mental Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

ABSTRACT

Mental health courts have quickly proliferated in the United States and represent an attempt to expand legal leverage and enhanced treatment access to select persons with severe mental illness who are also involved in the criminal justice system. A national survey of mental health courts has begun to elucidate the procedural, clinical, and operational aspects of these courts and the defendants they adjudicate. A secondary analysis of survey data was performed to determine the similarities and differences among these courts. Results revealed large variability among existing mental health courts across multiple domains. The implications of this variability are discussed in terms benefits and limitations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anspach D., Ferguson A. (2003). Assessing the efficacy of treatment modalities in the context of adult drug courts. Augusta, ME, University of Southern Maine

    Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum P. (2003). The ‘quiet’ crisis in mental health services. Health Affairs 22:110–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein R., Seltzer T. (2003). Criminalization of people with mental illnesses: The role of mental health courts in system reform. University of the District of Columbia Law Review 7:143–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Boldt R. (1998). Rehabilitative punishment and the drug treatment court movement. Washington Law Quarterly 76:1206–1306

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouffard J., Taxman F. (2004). Looking inside the ‘black box’ of drug court treatment services using direct observations. Journal of Drug Issues 34(1):195–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Cristy A., Pothyress N., Boothroyd R., Petrila J., Mehra S. (2005). Evaluating the efficacy and community safety goals of the Broward county mental health court, Behavioral Sciences and the Law 23:277–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie T., Anderson J. (2003). Drug treatment courts and popular but do they work and are they ethical and appropriate for Canada? Health Law in Canada 23(4):70–79

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cimino T., Jennings J. (2002). Arkansas partnership program: An innovative continuum of care program for dually diagnosed forensic patients. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Skills 6:104–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper C. (2003). Drug courts: Current issues and future perspectives. Substance Use and Misuse 38:1671–1711

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Criminal Justice/Mental Health Consensus Project Report (2002). Lexington, KY, Council of State Governments.

  • Ditton P. (1999). Bureau of justice statistics report: Mental health and treatment of inmates and probationers. US Department of Justice.

  • Dusky v. United States: 362 U.S. 402, 1960.

  • Goldkamp J., White M., Robinson J. (2001). Do drug courts work? Getting inside the drug court black box. Journal of Drug Issues 31(1):27–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin P., Steadman H., Petrila J. (2002). The use of criminal charges and sanctions in mental health courts. Psychiatric Services 53(10):1285–1289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, E., Seltzer, T., & Carter, L. (2004). The role of specialty mental health courts in meeting the needs of juvenile offenders. Position paper of Judge David L. Bazelon, Center for Mental Health Law. Retrieved June 24, 2005 from: http://www.bazelon.org/issues/criminalization/publications/mentalhealthcourts/juvenilemhcourts.htm

  • Hayebrand G., Wesier M., Rabinowitz J., Hoff A., DeLisi L. (2004). Correlates of cognitive deficits in first episode schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research 68:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Health Care Reform for Americans with Severe Mental Illness (1993). Report of the National Advisory Mental Health Council. American Journal of Psychiatry 150:1447–1465

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiday V. A. (2003). Outpatient commitment: The state of empirical research on its outcomes, Psychology. Public Policy and Law 9:8–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaye J. S. (2004). Delivering justice today: A problem-solving approach. Yale Law and Policy Review 22:125–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb R., Weinberger L. (1998) Persons with severe mental illness in jails and prisons: a review. Psychiatric Services 49:483–492

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lamberti J. S., Weisman R. (2004). Persons with severe mental disorders in the criminal justice system: challenges and opportunities. Psychiatric Quarterly 75(2):151–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lamberti J. S., Weisman R., Faden D. (2004). Forensic assertive community treatment: Preventing incarceration of adults with severe mental illness. Psychiatric Services 55(11):1285–1293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lurigio A., Fallon J., Dincin J. (2000). Helping the mentally ill in jails adjust to community life: a description of a post-release ACT program and its clients. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 44:450–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Alliance for the Mentally Ill (2001). Criminalization of mental illness. Retrieved March 24, 2005 from http://www.nami.org/content/contentgroups/policy/criminalization2001.pdf

  • National Law Enforcement and Mental Health Act of 2000. Pub. L. No. 106–515, 114 Stat. 2399 (codified as amended in scattered sections of 42 U.S.C.).

  • National Mental Health Association. (2003). “Position Statement: In Support of Maximum Diversion of Persons with Serious Mental Illness from the Criminal Justice System.” Retrieved March 24, 2005 from: http://www.nmha.org/position/diversion.com

  • Perlin M. (2003). “You have discussed lepers and crooks”: Sanism in clinical teaching. Clinical Law Review 9:683–700

    Google Scholar 

  • Poythress N., Petrila J., McGaha A., Boothroyd R. (2002). Perceived coercion and procedural justice in the Broward mental health court. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 25(5):517–533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slate R. (2003). From the jailhouse to Capitol Hill: Impacting mental health court legislation and defining what constitutes a mental health court. Crime and Delinquency 49(1):6–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SPSS, Inc. (2004). SPSS for Windows (version 13.0).

  • Steadman H. J., Davidson S., Brown C. (2001). Law and psychiatry: Mental health courts: Their promise and unanswered questions. Psychiatric Services 52(4):457–458

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Evidence-based practices: Shaping mental health services towards recovery. Retrieved March 15, 2005 from: http://www.mentalhealth.samhsa.gov/cmhs/communitysupport/toolkits

  • Swartz M., Swanson J., Hiday V., Wagner R., Burns B., Borum R. (2001). A randomized controlled trial of outpatient commitment in North Carolina. Psychiatric Services 52(3):325–329

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Talbott J. (1985). The fate of the public psychiatric system. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 36(1):46–50

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • The National GAINS Center for People with Co-occurring Disorders in the Justice System. (2005). Survey of mental health courts. Retrieved February 9, 2005, from http://www.mentalhealthcourtsurvey.com/

  • Watson A., Hanrahan P., Luchins D., Lurigio A. (2001). Mental health courts and complex issue of mentally ill offenders. Psychiatric Services 52(4):477–481

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel S., Turner S., Ridgely S. (2004). Collaborations between drug courts and service providers: Characteristics and challenges. Journal of Criminal Justice 32:253–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winick B. (1997). The jurisprudence of therapeutic jurisprudence, Psychology. Public Policy and Law 3(1): 184–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff N. (2002). Courts as therapeutic agents: Thinking past the novelty of mental health courts, Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 30(3):431–437

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA

    Steven K. Erickson J.D., L.L.M., Ph.D. (Postdoctoral Fellow, Severe Mental Disorders), Amy Campbell J.D., M.Bioethics (Senior Instructor in Psychiatry) & J. Steven Lamberti M.D. (Associate Professor of Psychiatry; Associate Chair for Clinical Programs; Director, Long Term Care Program)

Authors
  1. Steven K. Erickson J.D., L.L.M., Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amy Campbell J.D., M.Bioethics
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Steven Lamberti M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven K. Erickson J.D., L.L.M., Ph.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Erickson, S.K., Campbell, A. & Steven Lamberti, J. Variations in Mental Health Courts: Challenges, Opportunities, and a Call for Caution. Community Ment Health J 42, 335–344 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-006-9046-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-006-9046-7

KEYWORDS

Search

Navigation