Skip to main content
Log in

Three-dimensional viscoelastic finite-difference code and modelling of basement focusing effects on ground motion characteristics

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Computational Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper consists of two parts. The first part of the paper is concerned with developing a 3D staggered grid time-domain finite-difference (FD) code with fourth-order spatial accuracy for simulating the responses of viscoelastic geological models with a continuous variable grid size in all the directions. The 3D FD code is written in Fortran 90. In the developed code, the realistic damping in the time-domain simulation is incorporated based on the generalized Maxwell body rheological model proposed by Emmerich and Korn (GMB-EK) Geophysics 52,1252–1264, 1987 with improvements made by Kristeck and Moczo Bull Seism Soc Am 93, 2273–2280, 2003. The accuracy of implementation of the realistic damping is validated by comparing the numerically computed phase velocity, quality factors and spatial spectral damping with the same based on GMB-EK model and Futterman’s relations. It is also concluded that the grid spacing ratio up to 5.0 can be used unharmed. The second part of the paper presents the application of the developed code to simulate the basement focusing effects on ground motion characteristics in an unbounded medium. The combined effects of sediment damping and the focusing caused by the hemi-spherical (HS) and hemi-cylindrical (HC) synclinal basement topography (SBT) on the ground motion characteristics are studied. The simulated responses and the computed snapshots revealed the SBT focusing and defocusing phenomenon, intense mode conversion and diffractions of the incident waves. A good match of the spectral amplifications caused by the HS and HC basement topography models at their focus with the same computed analytically also reveals the accuracy of the developed FD code. The response of elastic HS and HC basement topography models revealed an increase of spectral amplification with an increase of frequency. Further, an increase of rate of frequency-dependent amplification towards the focus was inferred. The average spectral amplification (ASA) caused by the elastic HS basement topography model at the focus is more than the square of the same caused by the elastic HC basement topography model, and this ratio of ASA is increasing with an increase of sediment damping.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alex, C.M., Olsen, K.B.: Lens-effect in Santa Monica GRL 25, 3441–3444 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baher, S.A., Davis, P.M.: An application of seismic tomography to basin focusing of seismic waves and Northridge earthquake damage, Vol. 108, pp -1–22-17 (2003)

  3. Blanch, J.O., Robertsson, J.O.A., Symes, W.W.: Modeling of a constant Q: Methodology and algorithm for an efficient and optimally inexpensive viscoelastic techniqueGeophysics 60, 176–184 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Booth, D.B., Wells, R.E., Givler, R.W.: Chimney damage in the greater Seattle area from the Nisqually earthquake of 28 February 2001. Bull. Seis. Soc. Am. 94, 1143–1158 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Born, M., Wolf, E.: Principles of optics Pergamon. New York (1980)

  6. Carcione, J.M., Kosloff, D, Kosloff, R.: Wave propagation simulation in a linear viscoacoustic medium. Geophys J. 93, 393–407 (1988a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Carcione, J.M., Kosloff, D, Kosloff, R.: Wave propagation simulation in a linear viscoelastic medium. Geophys J 95, 597–611 (1988b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Carcione, J.M., Cavallini, F.: A rheological model for anelastic anisotropic media with applications to seismic wave propagation. Geophys. J. Int. 119, 338–348 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Carcione, J.M., Helle, H.B., Seriani, G., Plasencia Linares, M.P.: Simulation of seismograms in a 2-D viscoelastic earth by pseudo spectral methods. Geofísica Int. 44, 123–142 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Clayton, R.W., Engquist, B.: Absorbing boundary conditions for acoustic and elastic wave equations. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 67, 1529–1540 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Davis, P.M., Justin, L., Rubinstein, K.H., Liu, S.S., Knopoff, G.L.: Northridge earthquake damage caused by geologic focusing of seismic waves. Science 289, 1746–1750 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Day, S.M., Minster, J.B.: Numerical simulation of wave fields using a Padé approximant method. Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc. 78, 105–118 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Emmerich, H., Korn, M.: Incorporation of attenuation into time-domain computations of seismic wave fields. Geophysics 52, 1252–1264 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Emmerich, H.: PSV-wave propagation in a medium with local heterogeneities: a hybrid formulation and its application. Geophys. J. Int. 109, 54–64 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Frankel, A., Stephenson, W., Carver, D.: Sedimentary basin effects in Seattle, Washington: ground-motion observations and 3D simulations. Bull. Seis. Soc. Am. 99, 1579–1611 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Futterman, W.I.: Dispersive body waves. JGR 67, 5279–5291 (1962)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gao, S., Liu, H., Davis, P.M., Knopoff, G.L.: Localized amplification of seismic waves and correlation with damage due to the Northridge earthquake. Bull. Seis. Soc. Am. 86, S209–230 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Graves, R.W.: Simulating seismic wave propagation in 3D elastic media using staggered-grid finite differences. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 86, 1091–1106 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hartzell, S., Cranswick, E., Frankel, A., Carver, D., Meremonte, M.: Variability of site response in the Los Angeles urban area. Bull. Seis. Soc. Am. 87, 1377–1400 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ihnen, S.M., Hadley, D.M.: Prediction of strong ground motion in the Puget Sound region: the 1965 Seattle earthquake. Bull. Seis. Soc. Am. 76, 905–922 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Israeli, M., Orszag, S.A.: Approximation of radiation boundary conditions. J. Comp. Phys. 41, 115–135 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kristeck, J., Moczo, P.: Seismic wave propagation in viscoelastic media with material disconuties—a 3 D 4th order staggered grid finite difference modeling. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 93, 2273–2280 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kristek, J., Moczo, P., Galis, M.: Stable discontinuous staggered grid in the finite-difference modeling of seismic motion. Geophys. J. Int. 183, 1401–1407 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kumar, S., Narayan, J.P.: Implementation of absorbing boundary conditions in a 4th order accurate SH-wave staggered grid finite difference program with variable grid size. Acta Geophys. 56, 1090–1108 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Levander, A.R.: Fourth-order finite-difference P-SV seismograms. Geophysics 53, 1425–1436 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu, H.P., Anderson, D.L., Kanamori, H.: Velocity dispersion due to anelasticity: implication for seismology and mantle composition. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 47, 41–58 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Madariaga, R.: Dynamics of an expanding circular fault. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 67, 163–182 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  28. McDonal, F.J., Angona, F.A., Mills, R.L., Sengbush, R.L., Van Nostrand, R.G., White, J.E.: Attenuation of shear and compressional waves in Pierre shale. Geophysics 23, 421–439 (1958)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Marcuse, D.: Light transmission optics, ed. 2. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Miyatake, T.: Numerical simulation of earthquake source process by a three-dimensional crack model, part I. Rupture process. J. Phys. Earth. 28, 565–598 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Moczo, P.: Finite-difference technique for SH-waves in 2D media using irregular grids—application to the seismic response problem. Geophys. Jr. 99, 321–329 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Moczo, P., Bard, P.-Y., diffraction, Wave: amplification and differential motion near strong lateral discontinuities. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 83(1), 85–106 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Moczo, P., Bystricky, E., Kristek, J., Carcione, J.M., Bouchon, M.: Hybrid modelling of P-SV seismic motion at inhomogeneous viscoelastic topographic structures. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 87, 1305–1323 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Moczo, P., Kristek, J., Bystricky, E.: Stability and grid dispersion of the P-SV 4th order staggered grid finite difference scheme Stud. Geophys. Geod. 44, 381–402 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Moczo, P., Kristek, J., Vaclav Vavrycuk, R.J., Archuleta, Halada, L.: 3D heterogeneous staggered-grid finite-difference modelling of seismic motion with volume harmonic and arithmetic averaging of elastic moduli and densities. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 92, 3042–3066 (2002)

  36. Moczo, P., Kristek, J., Halada, L.: The finite-difference method for seismologists. An introduction Comenius University,Bratislava (2004)

  37. Moczo, P., Kristek, J.: On the rheological models used for time domain methods of seismic wave propagation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L01306 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Narayan, J.P.: Study of basin-edge effects on the ground motion characteristics using 2.5-D modeling. Pure Appl. Geophys. 162, 273–289 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Narayan, J.P., Kumar, S.: A 4th order accurate SH-wave staggered grid finite-difference program with variable grid size and VGR-stress imaging technique. Pure Appl. Geophys 165, 271–294 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Narayan, J.P., Kumar, S.: (2,4) Parsimonious staggered grid P-SV wave FD algorithm with VGR-stress imaging technique and variable grid size. Geofizika 27, 45–68 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Narayan, J.P.: Effects of P-wave and S-wave impedance contrast on the characteristics of basin transduced Rayleigh waves. Pure Appl Geophys. 169, 693–709 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Narayan, J.P., Kumar, V.: Numerical study of effects of synclinal basement topography on ground motion characteristics (Paper No. 3144), Proc. of 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (15WCEE), Lisbon, Portugal, Sept. 24-28, (2012)

  43. Narayan, J.P., Kumar, V.: Study of combined effects of sediment rheology and basement focusing in an unbounded viscoelastic medium using P-SV-wave finite-difference modelling Acta Geophysica (2014)

  44. Oprsal, I., Zahradnik, J. Geophysics 64, 240–250 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Oprsal, I., Zahradnik, J.: Three-dimensional finite difference method and hybrid modeling of earthquake ground motion. J. Geophys. Res. 107, 2–15 (2002). (B8) ESE 2-1-ESE

    Google Scholar 

  46. Pitarka, A.: 3D elastic finite-difference modeling of seismic motion using staggered grids with nonuniform spacing. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 89, 54–68 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Robertsson, J., Blanch, J., Symes, W.: Viscoelastic finite-difference modeling. Geophysics 59, 1444–1456 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Savage, B., Komatitsch, D., Tromp, J.: Effects of 3D attenuation on seismic wave amplitude and phase measurements. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 100(3), 1241–1251 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Stephenson, W.J., Frankel, A.D., Odum, J.K., Williams, R.A., Pratt, T.L.: Towards resolving an earthquake ground motion mystery in west Seattle, Washington State: shallow seismic focusing may cause anomalous chimney damage GRL, 33, L06316 (2006)

  50. Virieux, J.: Geophysics 49, 1933–1957 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Virieux, J.: Geophysics 51, 889–901 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Xu, T., McMechan, G.A.: Composite memory variables for viscoelastic synthetic seismograms. Geophys. J. Int. 121, 634–639 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Zhu, T., Carcione, J.M., Harris, J.M.: Approximating constant-Q seismic propagation in the time domain, Approximating constant-Q seismic propagation in the time domain, Geophysical Prospecting, 2013, 61, 931–940 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Sahar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Narayan, J.P., Sahar, D. Three-dimensional viscoelastic finite-difference code and modelling of basement focusing effects on ground motion characteristics. Comput Geosci 18, 1023–1047 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-014-9442-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-014-9442-y

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)

Navigation