Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Population MCMC methods for history matching and uncertainty quantification

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents the application of a population Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) technique to generate history-matched models. The technique has been developed and successfully adopted in challenging domains such as computational biology but has not yet seen application in reservoir modelling. In population MCMC, multiple Markov chains are run on a set of response surfaces that form a bridge from the prior to posterior. These response surfaces are formed from the product of the prior with the likelihood raised to a varying power less than one. The chains exchange positions, with the probability of a swap being governed by a standard Metropolis accept/reject step, which allows for large steps to be taken with high probability. We show results of Population MCMC on the IC Fault Model—a simple three-parameter model that is known to have a highly irregular misfit surface and hence be difficult to match. Our results show that population MCMC is able to generate samples from the complex, multi-modal posterior probability distribution of the IC Fault model very effectively. By comparison, previous results from stochastic sampling algorithms often focus on only part of the region of high posterior probability depending on algorithm settings and starting points.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aanonsen, S., Naevdal, G., Oliver, D., Reynolds, A., Vallès, B.: The ensemble Kalman filter in reservoir engineering – a review. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 14(3), 393–412 (2009) SPE 117274-PA

    Google Scholar 

  2. Busby, D.: Hierarchical adaptive experimental design for Gaussian process emulators. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 94(7), 1183–1193 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Busby, D., Feraille, M.: Adaptive design of experiments for calibration of complex simulators—An application to uncertainty quantification of a mature oil field. J. Phys.: Conference Series 135(1), 012026 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Busby, D., Farmer, C., Iske, A.: Uncertainty evaluation in reservoir forecasting by Bayes linear methodology. In: Iske, A., and Levesley, J. (eds.) Algorithms for Approximation. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference, Chester, pp. 187–196. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Busby, D., Farmer, C., Iske, A.: Hierarchical nonlinear approximation for experimental design and statistical data fitting. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 29(1), 49–69 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Bush, M., Carter, J.: Applications of a modified genetic algorithm to parameter estimation in the petroleum industry. In: Dagli, D., Akay, E., Chen, C., Fernandez, B., and Ghosh, J. (eds.) Intelligent Engineering Systems through Artificial Neural Networks, pp. 6. ASME, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Calderhead, B., Girolami, M.: Estimating Bayes factors via thermodynamic integration and population MCMC. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 53(12), 4028–4045 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Carter, J., and Ballester, P.: A real-parameter genetic algorithm for clustering identification in history matching, A012. In: Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Mathematics of Oil Recovery, Cannes, France, 30 August–02 September (2004)

  9. Carter, C., Ballester, P., Tavassoli, Z., King, P.: Our calibrated model has poor predictive value: An example from the petroleum industry. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 91, 1373–1381 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Christie, M., Demyanov, V., Erbas, D.: Uncertainty quantification for porous media flows. J. Comput. Phys. 217(1), 143–158 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Demyanov, V., Pozdnoukhov, A., Christie, M., Kanevski, M.: Detection of optimal models in high dimensional parameter space with support sector machines. In: Proceedings of geoENV VII European Conference on Geostatistics for Environmental Applications (2008)

  12. Duane, S., Kennedy, A., Pendleton, B., Roweth, D.: Hybrid Monte Carlo. Phys. Lett. B 195(2), 216–222 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Erbas, D., Christie, M.: Effect of sampling strategies on prediction uncertainty estimation. In: Proceedings of the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, SPE 106229, Houston, Texas, USA, 26–28 February (2007a)

  14. Erbas, D., Christie, M.: How does sampling strategies affect uncertainty estimations? Oil Gas Sci. Technol. – Rev. IFP 62(2), 155–167 (2007b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Evensen, G.: Data assimilation, The Ensemble Kalman Filter, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Filippone, M., Calderhead, B., Girolami, M., Mohamed, L., Christie M.: Inference for Gaussian process emulation of oil reservoir simulation codes. In: Proceedings of the ISBA 2010 World Meeting/9th Valencia Meeting, Benidorm, Spain, 3–8 June (2010)

  17. Geyer, C.: Markov chain Monte Carlo maximum likelihood. In: Keramidas, M. (ed.) Computing Science and Statistics: Proceedings of the 23rd Symposium on the Interface, pp. 156–163. Interface Foundation, Fairfax Station (1991)

  18. Gilks, W., Richardson, S., Spiegelhalter, D.: Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice. Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Girolami, M., Calderhead, B.: Riemann manifold Langevin and Hamiltonian Monte Carlo methods (with discussion). J. R. Stat. Soc., Ser. B 73(2), 1–37 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Hajizadeh, Y., Christie, M., Demyanov, V.: History matching with differential evolution approach: A look at new search strategies. In: Proceedings of the 72nd EAGE Conference and Exhibition/SPE EUROPEC 2010, SPE 130253, Barcelona, Spain, 14–17 June (2010)

  21. Holloman, C., Lee, H., Higdon, D.: Multiresolution genetic algorithms and Markov chain Monte Carlo. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 15(4), 861–879 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. IC Fault Model: London: Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London. http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/earthscienceandengineering/research/perm/icfaultmodel, accessed July (2010)

  23. Jaynes, E.: Probability Theory: The Logic of Science, vol. 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim, W., Park, J., Lee, K.: Stereo matching using population–based MCMC. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 83(2), 195–209 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liang, F., Wong, W.: Evolutionary Monte Carlo: applications to Cp model sampling and change point problem. Stat Sin 10, 317–342 (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu, N., Oliver, D.: Evaluation of Monte Carlo methods for assessing uncertainty. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 8(2), 188–195 (2003) SPE 84936–PA

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ma, X., Al-Harbi, M., Datta-Gupta, A., Efendiev, Y.: An efficient two-stage sampling method for uncertainty quantification in history matching geological models. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 13(1), 77–87 (2008) SPE 102476-PA

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mohamed, L., Christie, M., Demyanov, V.: Comparison of stochastic sampling algorithms for uncertainty quantification. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 15(1), 31–38 (2010a) SPE 119139–PA

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mohamed, L., Christie, M., Demyanov, V.: Reservoir model history matching with particle swarms. In: Proceedings of the Oil and Gas India Conference and Exhibition (OGIC), SPE 129152, Mumbai, India, 20–22 January (2010b)

  30. Mohamed, L., Christie, M., Demyanov, V., Robert, E., Kachuma, D.: Application of particle swarms for history matching in the Brugge reservoir. In: Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition (ATCE), SPE 135264, Florence, Italy (2010c)

  31. Petrovska, I., Carter, J.: Estimation of distribution algorithms for history matching. In: Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 4–7 September (2006)

  32. Sambridge, M.: Geophysical inversion with a neighbourhood algorithm – II. Appraising the ensemble. Geophys. J. Int. 138(3), 727–746 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Specht, D.: A general regression neural network. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 2(6), 568–576 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tavassoli, Z., Carter, C., King, P.: Errors in history matching. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 9(3), 352–361 (2004) SPE 86883–PA

    Google Scholar 

  35. Vrugt, J., Braak, C., Diks, C., Robinson, B., Hyman, J., Higdon, D.: Accelerating Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation by differential evolution with self-adaptive randomised subspace sampling. Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 10(3), 273–290 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Williams, G., Mansfield, M., MacDonald, D., Bush, M.: Top–down reservoir modelling. In: Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, SPE 89974, Houston, Texas, 26–29 September (2004)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Petroleum Engineering, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK

    Linah Mohamed & Mike Christie

  2. Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK

    Ben Calderhead, Maurizio Filippone & Mark Girolami

Authors
  1. Linah Mohamed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ben Calderhead
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maurizio Filippone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mike Christie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mark Girolami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mike Christie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mohamed, L., Calderhead, B., Filippone, M. et al. Population MCMC methods for history matching and uncertainty quantification. Comput Geosci 16, 423–436 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-011-9232-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-011-9232-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation