Skip to main content
Log in

Relation between two common localisation methods for the EnKF

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates the relation between two common localisation methods in ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) systems: covariance localisation and local analysis. Both methods are popular in large-scale applications with the EnKF. The case of local observations with non-correlated errors is considered. Both methods are formulated in terms of tapering of ensemble anomalies, which provides a framework for their comparison. Based on analytical considerations and experimental evidence, we conclude that in practice the two methods should yield very similar results, so that the choice between them should be based on other criteria, such as numerical effectiveness and scalability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson, J.L.: A local least squares framework for ensemble filtering. Mon. Weather Rev. 131, 634–642 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, J.L.: Exploring the need for localization in ensemble data assimilation using a hierarchical ensemble filter. Physica D 230, 99–111 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bishop, C.H., Hodyss, D.: Flow-adaptive moderation of spurious ensemble correlations and its use in ensemble-based data assimilation. Q. J. Royal Meteorol. Soc. 133, 2029–2044 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bishop, C.H., Hodyss, D.: Ensemble covariances adaptively localized with ECO-RAP. part 1: tests on simple error models. Tellus 61A, 84–96 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bishop, C.H., Etherton, B., Majumdar, S.J.: Adaptive sampling with the ensemble transform Kalman filter. Part I: theoretical aspects. Mon. Weather Rev. 129, 420–436 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Burgers, G., van Leeuwen, P.J., Evensen, G.: Analysis scheme in the ensemble Kalman filter. Mon. Weather Rev. 126, 1719–1724 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cross, M.: Introduction to Chaos. Available at: http://www.cmp.caltech.edu/~mcc/Chaos_Course/Outline.html (2009)

  8. Evensen, G.: Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi-geostrophic model using Monte-Carlo methods to forecast error statistics. J. Geophys. Res. 99, 10143–10162 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Evensen, G.: The Ensemble Kalman filter: theoretical formulation and practical implementation. Ocean Dyn. 53, 343–367 (2003). doi:10.1007/sl10236-003-0036-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Evensen, G.: Data Assimilation: the Ensemble Kalman Filter, 2nd edn. Springer, Dordrecht (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gaspari, G., Cohn, S.E.: Construction of correlation functions in two and three dimensions. Q. J. Royal Meteorol. Soc. 125, 723–757 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hamill, T.M., Whitaker, J.S.: Distance-dependent filtering of background error covariance estimates in an ensemble Kalman filter. Mon. Weather Rev. 129, 2776–2790 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Horn, R.A., Johnson, C.R.: Matrix Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA (1985)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Houtekamer, P.L., Mitchell, H.L.: A sequential ensemble Kalman filter for atmospheric data assimilation. Mon. Weather Rev. 129, 123–137 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hunt, B.R., Kostelich, E.J., Szunyogh, I.: Efficient data assimilation for spatiotemporal chaos: a local ensemble transform Kalman filter. Physica D 230, 112–126 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Oke, P.R., Sakov, P., Corney, S.P.: Impacts of localisation in the EnKF and EnOI: experiments with a small model. Ocean Dyn. 57, 32–45 (2007). doi:10.1007/sl10236-006-0088-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ott, E., Hunt, B.R., Szunyogh, I., Zimin, A.V., Kostelich, E.J., Corazza, M., Kalnay, E., Patil, D.J., Yorke, J.A.: A local ensemble Kalman filter for atmospheric data assimilation. Tellus 56A, 415–428 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sakov P, Oke P.R.: A deterministic formulation of the ensemble Kalman filter: an alternative to ensemble square root filters. Tellus 60A, 361–371 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sakov, P., Oke, P.R.: Implications of the form of the ensemble transformations in the ensemble square root filters. Mon. Weather Rev. 136, 1042–1053 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tippett, M.K., Anderson, J.L., Bishop, C.H., Hamill, T.M., Whitaker, JS.: Ensemble square root filters. Mon. Weather Rev. 131,1485–1490 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Whitaker, J.S., Hamill, T.M.: Ensemble data assimilation without perturbed observations. Mon. Weather Rev. 130, 1913–1924 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Whitaker, J.S., Hamill, T.M., Wei, X., Song, Y., Toth, Z.: Ensemble data assimilation with the NCEP global forecast system. Mon. Weather Rev. 136, 463–482 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pavel Sakov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sakov, P., Bertino, L. Relation between two common localisation methods for the EnKF. Comput Geosci 15, 225–237 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-010-9202-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-010-9202-6

Keywords

Navigation